Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Oswald Colaco Vs. Corporation of the City of Panaji, Through Its Commissioner and Others
Decided On : Apr-24-2014
Court : Mumbai Goa
LAW: a Regular Civil Appeal, the Civil Appeal, Section 44, Article 227, Article 227
CARDINAL: 1, no.94 to 99, four, one, four, One, two, 2., two, one, one, two, 3., 4., 5, two, 3, 8, 9, 3, 10, 11, 12, four, one, two, two, 13, 13, 14, 15, two, four, three, 16, 3, 17, 18, one, 19, 20
DATE: 17/12/2013, 21/09/2012, 17/09/2012, 3/05/2007, 16/10/2012, 21/09/2012, 17/12/2013, 3/05/2007, 3/05/2007, 3/05/2007, 24/10/2011, 1974, 1/03/2012, 3/05/2007
ORG: the Commissioner of the Corporation of the City of Panaji, the Minister for Urban Development, Government of Goa in Municipal Appeal No, no.2, no.2, no.2, Kalpesh, the Patto Laundry, the Adhoc District Court, no.2, the High Court, First Appeal, no.1, no.2, no.1, Court, no.2, this Court in Civil Application, First Appeal, Court, no.2, no.2, Court, Learned Counsel, no.2, Learned Counsel, Court, Civil Application, First Appeal, Civil Application, no.2, no.2, Learned Counsel, the Town and Country Planning Act, Learned Counsel, no.2, no.2, no.2, Town and Country Planning Act, the North Goa Planning and Development Authority, no.1, no.2, the North Goa Planning and Development Authority, no.2, no.2, no.2, Civil Application, First Appeal, Court, Court, Court, the Writ Petition
PERSON: Panaji, Sebastiao Azavedo, Shri Natwarlal Gohil, Maria Dias, Patto Laundry, Maria Dias, Maria Dias, Patto Laundry, Maria Dias, Bras De Sa, Counsel, Shri V. Rodrigues, Shri J.P. Mulgaonkar, Sebastiao Azavedo, Azavedo, 17/12/2013, Counsel
ORDINAL: fourth, third, first, third, third, third, third, first
FAC: Patto Laundry
PRODUCT: no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1
GPE: no.3, Counsel, personem
WORK_OF_ART: Municipal Appeal No