Khairunnissa Rasool Golandaj Vs. State of Maharashtra (Through the Secretary, Public Health Department and Another

Decided On : May-07-2014

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Article 226 of Constitution of India, Section 409, Article 226 of Constitution of India, Rule 70, Rule 72, the Regulation 72(5, Rule 72, Rule 72

GPE: G.S. Kulkarni, Yerawada, Pune, India, Sholapur, Sholapur, Suspension, Suspension, Suspension, Cajee, Workmen, Sholapur, India, Mumbai, Rs.50,000/-

PERSON: Gulam Mohammed Golandaj, Dismissal, Clerk, Solapur as Head Clerk, Walawalkar, Solapur, Golandaj, Head Clerk, Shri, Golandaj, Head Clerk, Dismissal, Removal, Misc, Dismissal, Removal, Dismissal, Removal, Dismissal, Removal, Jormanik Siem, Devendra Pratap Narain Rai Sharma Vs, Balvantrai Ratilal Patel, Chandra Gupta, Regulations, Shri, Clerk, Nagpur, Shri Golandaj, Regulations, Shri Golandaj, Shri Golandaj, Shri Golandaj, Shri Golandaj, Shri Golandaj, Shri Golandaj, Shri Golandaj, E.S.I. Scheme, Dismissal, Removal Allowance, Golandaj, Bata Krishna Burman, Krishna Burman

ORG: the Employees State Insurance Scheme of the Government of Maharashtra, the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal in Original Application no.306, the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Administrative Tribunal', Maharashtra Civil Services, Court, the Administrative Tribunal, the Administrative Tribunal, the State Government, the Central Mental Hospital, Pune, the Diagnostic Centre, ESI Scheme, Sadar Bazar Police Station, Dhanrajgiriji Hospital Authorities, the ESI Diagnostic Centre, Dhanrajgiriji Hospital, the Sessions Court, no.2, Court, the Sessions Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Special Leave Petition, the Supreme Court, Criminal, the Government Provident Fund, GPF, Civil Suit No.998, Civil Suit, Civil Suit, Civil Suit, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Civil Suit, the Supreme Court, Court, the ESI Hospital, Nagpur, the Supreme Court, the Diagnostic Centre, ESIS, the Civil Service (Conduct) Rules, the Diagnostic Centre, Respondents, ESIS, the State Government, the Administrative Tribunal, Original Application no.61, The Administrative Tribunal, Original Application, The Administrative Tribunal, The Administrative Tribunal, the Original Application, order:- œ21, the Departmental Appeal, Respondents, the Administrative Tribunal, Administrative Tribunal, the Tribunal on 6.10.1995, the Administrative Tribunal, Tribunal, the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Original Application no.306, the Administrative Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Miscellaneous Application, the Maharashtra Civil Services, Administrative Tribunal, the respondents:- œ11, Original, Respondents, the Administrative Tribunal, the Administrative Tribunal, the Administrative Tribunal, no.2, Communication, the Administrative Tribunal, the Maharashtra Civil Services, the Supreme Court, the Maharashtra Civil Services, the Maharashtra Civil Services, Government, no.2, The Management of Hotel Imperial, Hotel Workers Union, AIR 1959 SC, LLJ 652, Uttar Paradesh, The State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1968, Supreme Court, State of, Maharashtra (AIR 1968, The State of Madhya Pradesh, Union of India, AIR 1984 SC 380, Firestone Tyre, The Firestone Tyre and, Rubber Co., Additional Government Pleader, the Administrative Tribunal, no.2, no.2, Court, Government Money, the Sessions Court, The Supreme Court, under:- œAs, State Employees Insurance Scheme Hospital, the Supreme Court, The Disciplinary Authority, The Administrative Tribunal in Original Application no.61, The Administrative Tribunal, the Maharashtra Civil Services, Foreign Services, Court, Court of Addl, the Sessions Court, Honourable High Court, the Honourable Supreme Court, Original Application No.612, the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, The Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, the Original Application, the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, the Maharashtra Civil Service, Tribunal, Inquiry, the Disciplinary Authority, Inquiry, inter alia, the Disciplinary Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, The Supreme Court, Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Singh Vs, Uttar Pradesh, Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, Court, the District Magistrate, Sitapur, Court, the High Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Disciplinary Authority, Inquiry, the Disciplinary Authority, the Administrative Tribunal, Tribunal, Inquiry, The Disciplinary Authority, Inquiry

CARDINAL: 1.4.2005, 1.3.2007, 27.10.1965, 1.3.2007, 2., 3., 2.12.1963, 1.6.1964, 4.8.1965, 2.9.1965, 7.9.1965, 5., 27.10.1965, 27.10.1965, one, two, Two, 471, 477, 6, 6.2.1968, 8., 18.11.1987, one, 9, 8.4.1988, 10, 1.1.1968, 1.2.1991, 22.12.1967, 7.4.1988, 11, 12, 1.2.1991, 13, 14, 8.5.1995, 8.5.1995, 31.8.2000, 8.5.1995, 15, 27.10.1975, 5, 4.2.2008, 1.3.2007, 16, 1.3.2007, 25.11.1971, 70, 1.3.2007, 17, 1, 315, 240, 900);V., 1, 18, 1.3.2007, 1.3.2007, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25.11.1971, 8.4.1988, 24, 25, 1.2.1991, two, 22.12.1967, 16, 27.10.1965, 7.4.1988, two, One, 7.4.1988, 70, 26, 1.3.2007, 81/1967, 8.5.1995, 1.04.2005, 5, 27, 28, two, 29, 1970(3, 612, 30, 11, 683, 13, 31, 1.3.2007, two, 1.3.2007, 1.3.2007, 6.2.1968, 20.12.1990, Fifty thousand

DATE: 2003, 27.10.1965 to 21.12.1967, about 2 years, 2 months, 1981, almost thirty years, the year 1957, 467, 3 years, 1967, three years, 1973, 1973, 4.10.1980, 1973, about 7 years, eight days, about 7 years, 1988, about 8 years, 22.3.1988, about seventeen long years, 1965, 10.5.1989, more than 25 years, 20.12.1990, 20.12.1990, 27.10.1965 to 21.12.1967, 1994, 20.12.1990, 8.5.1995, 20.12.1990, 25.04.1991, a month, today, 31.07.1992, six months, today, four months, today, the next four months, a month, seven days, 15.5.1995, 1995, about five years, 2003, 2004, 27.10.1965 to 21.12.1967, a period of, three months, 27.10.1965 to 21.12.1967, 27.10.1965 to, 22.3.1988, 27.10.1965 to 21.12.1967, 1342, 1961 1, 1962, 1970, 1976, 1154, 27.10.1965 to 21.12.1967, more than 25 years, about 47 years ago, the year 2014, about seventeen years, 22.3.1988, 22.3.1988, 22.3.1988, 22.3.1988, 20.12.1990, 21.12.1967, 1997, 27.10.1965 to 21.12.1967, 21.12.1967, 1981, 1967, 3 years, 1967, 3 years, 1992, 1994, 15.05.1995, 72, 1981, 27.10.1965 to 21.12.1967, 1965, 27.10.1965 to 21.12.1967, 13.9.2004, 1.3.2007, 27.10.1965 to 21.12.1967, 22.3.1988, 22.3.1988, 27.10.1965 to 21.12.1967, 32, 21.12.1967, four weeks, four weeks

PRODUCT: Rule 72(5, Memorandum, Shri, Criminal Case No, Rule 72(5

ORDINAL: second, second, first, first, first, firstly, secondly, second, first, second, second, second, second, second, firstly, Secondly, firstly, second, Second

LOC: Pune, Western Maharashtra Region

PERCENT: 6%, 20%

WORK_OF_ART: Judgment and Order, 23.2.2007

EVENT: the Enquiry Report

FAC: 22.12.1990/1.2.1991