M/S. Kingfisher Airlines Ltd., Represented by Company Secretary Bharath Raghavan and Another Vs. the Income Tax Department

Decided On : Jan-18-2014

Court : Karnataka

LAW: Section 276-B, Section 278-B of Income Tax Act, Section 133-A of the Income Tax Act, the I.T. Act', Section 201(1, the I.T. Act, Section 276-B, the I.T. Act, Section 276-B, Section 278-B of the I.T. Act, Section 279(1, the I.T. Act, Section 279(1, the I.T. Act, Section 279(1, the I.T. Act, Section 201(1, Section 201(A, the I.T. Act, Section 276-B, the I.T. Act, Circle 16(1, Section 279(1, the I.T. Act, Section 201(1, the I.T. Act, Section 279(1, the I.T. Act, Section 201(1, Section 201(1-A, the I.T. Act, Section 201(1, the I.T. Act, Section 276-B, the I.T. Act, Section 201(1, Section 201(1-A, the I.T. Act, Section 201(1-A, the I.T. Act, the I.T. Act, Point No. ii, the I.T. Act, section 275A, section 276A, section 276C, section 277, Section 276-B., Section 279, Section 279, Section 279, the I.T. Act, Section 201 IPC, Section 201(A, the I.T. Act, Section 2(35, the I.T. Act, section 2(35, Section 482, Section 2(35-B, the I.T. Act, Section 2(35-B, section 2

PERSON: Bangalore, Nagamohan Das, Bangalore, Nos, C.C. Nos, Bangalore, Sri, Rao, Sri, Mohan Parasaran, Sri, Sri

ORG: C.C.No.77/2013, C.C.No.78/2013 Against The First And Second Petitioners, 77/2013, Special Court, the Economic Offences Court, Income Tax Department, Government, TDS, Government, TDS, TDS, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Income Tax Department, Court, ITA No, Learned Single, Court, this Court the Assessing Officer, Court, Court, 77/2013, Special Court, Special Court, Court, Court, TDS, the Special Court, Court, the Special Court, ACIT, the Special Court, Reliance, Solicitor General, the Special Court, Income Tax, the Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, ACIT, Reliance, the Special Court, 77/2013, 78/2013, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Income Tax Department, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Assessing Authority, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Assessing Authority, the Central Government, TDS, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, Income Tax, the Commissioner of Income Tax, Income Tax, Income Tax, ACIT, TDS, ACIT, TDS, ACIT, TDS Circle, the Central Government, the Central Government, The Supreme Court, Madhumilan Syntex Ltd., Vs., Union of India, ITR, SC, Court, The Supreme Court, Madumilan Syntex, Court

CARDINAL: three, 78/2013, 2, three, three, 3, 1, 2, 1, 18.03.2011, 1, 1, Four hundred, 1, 1, 4., 30.12.2011, 1, 1, 29.02.2012, 1, 25.05.2012, 1, 164, 165, 5, 239, 240, 241/2012, 6., three, 278, 78/2013, 30.03.2013, 7, 8., 278, 16(1, 9, 10, 11, 1, 1, 21.12.2011, 21.02.2012, 1, No.2, 12, 13, 279, 1, two, 1, 14, 1, 1, 1, 15, 16(1, 16(1, 16(1, 16, 2, 1 Company, 2, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, No.1, 290, 199, 43, 17, 1, 2, more than one, 27, one, 2, 18

GPE: C.C., Bangalore City, India, India, C.C., P.C., T.R., Venkatadri, T.R., Venkatadri

DATE: the financial years 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12, the financial years 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12, 17.11.2011, 27.01.2012, 15.03.2012, each financial year, 276BB, 276CC, annual, 2007, 35

ORDINAL: second, first, second, first

NORP: ITAT, ITAT, ITAT, ITAT, ITAT, ITAT

PERCENT: 50%

LOC: TDS Circle, TDS Circle - 16(1, TDS Circle

PRODUCT: R-10, R-11, R-12, R-15, R-16, No.1