“14. I Have Gone Through the Relevant Provisions of the Law. the Vs. …..Respondent

Decided On : May-19-2014

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, Rule 26, Rule 209A, Rule 26

ORG: CEA No.72 of 2011, CEA Nos.75, Ajay Kumar Mittal, Central Excise Appeal Nos.72, CEA No.72, CEA No.72 of 2011, Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Central Excise Rules, Notification No.8/2007- CE(NT, CEA No.72 of 2011, Central Excise Division, M/s A.R.Alloys, Nasrauli Road, Mandi Gobindgarh, Cenvat, M/s Minni Steel Traders, Minni Steel, A.R. Alloys, M/s I.S.Steel, Agro Industries, Cenvat Credit, Cenvat Credit, Cenvat Credit, Show Cause Notice, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, Central Excise, CEA, the Commissioner (Appeals, Tribunal, Court, CEA, Central Excise Commissionerate, the Commissioner (Appeals, Tribunal, the Central Excise Rules 2002, Court, Commissioner(Appeals, Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, Tribunal, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Cenvat Credit Rules, the Cenvat Credit Rules, Central Excise Rules, Tribunal, M/s I.S.Steel & Agro Industries, Cenvat Credit, the Commissioner (Appeals, CCE, Panchkula, CCE Chandigarh, Ashish Gupta, MODVAT, Central Excise Rules, Hon'ble High Court, Central Excise Rules, Hon'ble High Court, the Commissioner (Appeals, Tribunal, Ajay Kumar Mittal

CARDINAL: 1, 5.2014, 87, 79, 2011.2, 16.11.2010, 2, 2, 26, 1.3.2007, 1.3.2007, 1.3.2007, 3, 10,14,979.60, 29.2.2008, 16.11.2010, 105, 17.3.2011, 2, 26, 1.3.2007, 1.3.2007, 1.3.2007, 25, 1, 5, 13(2, 1.3.2007, 2, 26, 1.3.2007, 17, 8, 6, 1.3.2007, 7, 2, 1.3.2007, 9

PERSON: Central Excise, MITTAL HON’BLE MR, Sukhdev Sharma, Sudeep Singh, Deepak Gupta, Jagmohan Bansal, Ish Puneet, Chandigarh CEA No.72, Mandi Gobindgarh, Minni Ispat, Mandi Gobindgarh, Anil Kumar Singla, Mandi Gobindgarh, Minni Ispat, Chandigarh CEA No.72, Kay Enterprises, Singh Gurbax 2014.06.13, Chandigarh CEA No.72, Chandigarh V. Shri Ashish Gupta, Vee Kay Enterprises’s, Rule 26(2, Chandigarh CEA No.72, thus:“14, Rule, Nos, Chandigarh CEA No.72, Chandigarh CEA No.72, Jaspal Singh, Singh Gurbax

PRODUCT: Appellant Vs, Central Excise Duty, 209A. Rule 26(2, imposed.10

GPE: CEA Nos.72, CEA Nos.73, New Delhi, Singh, Ashish Gupta

DATE: 74, 76, 79, 77 of 2011, 78 of 2011 ---For, 87 of 2011, 1944, 2014.06.13 10:53, 2002, 30.6.2002, April 2002, March 2002, 2014.06.13 10:53, 26.2.2007, 31.10.2008, 2010, 4 5, 2009, 1.3.2007, 2002, 2002, 2002, 2014.06.13 10:53, 1944, 2002, 2002, May 19, 2014 (, 2014.06.13 10:53

NORP: J.1, Rules, Rules, Rules, Rules

WORK_OF_ART: law:-, Notification No.8/2007 CE/(N.T., Rule 209A.

FAC: Singh Gurbax, Singh Gurbax 2014.06.13, Singh Gurbax, the Singh Gurbax 2014.06.13 10:53