Present: Mr. Vikas Kumar Advocate Vs. Ram Sarup and Others ...Appellants

Decided On : May-07-2014

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: section 5(1)(a, Punjab Tenancy Act

ORG: vinod, Civil Revision No.1758 of, Khatauni No.35, District Faridabad, Bhule Ram S/o Ram Lal, Bhule Ram, Sanyasi, Bulhe Ram, Bhule Ram, Bhule Ram, no.2, no.1, the Trial Court, the Trial Court, Appellate Court, PW-3, Sanyasi, Trial Court, no.1, Bhule Ram, Bhule Ram, Bhule Ram, Sanyasi, Bhule Ram

CARDINAL: 2014.05.20 10:34, 1].CR, 1, 2, 7, 13, 2014.05.20 10:34, 2].CR, 2014.05.20 10:34, 10, 4].CR, 11, 2014.05.20 10:34, 5].CR, 3

PERSON: Chandigarh Rs, Appellants Versus Mahavir, Justice, Vikas Kumar, JAIN, No.30, No.12, Killa, Chandigarh Rs, Mal Sawai, Sanyasi, Prithvi, Ramji Lal, Ramji Lal, no.1, Chandigarh Rs, Chandigarh Rs, Chandigarh Rs, Gair Marausi, JAIN

DATE: 2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, 6).12/2(5-7).total, 2011, today, the year 1995, the year 1995, 1988, 2011, 09.01.2010, more than 40 yeaRs, 70 years old, 1966-67, the year 1988, 1995, the year 1988, 1995, year 1988, 1988, year 1988, just 22 years old, 1988, 1988, 2011, 1887, 1988, the year 1995, 2011, the year 1995, May 07, 2014

GPE: KhaSr, Badoli, Tehsil, Bhule, Bhule, Sanyasi, Bhule, Bhule, Bhule, Bhule, Bhule, Bhule, Bhule, Bhule, Bhule, Bhule, Bhule, Bhule, Bhule, Bhule, Bhule, Sanyasi, Bhule, no.4

PRODUCT: No.1, No.1, no.1, No.1