Skip to content

“33 (5) No Appeal Preferred by an Assessee to an Appellate Authority Shall Vs. State of Haryana and Others - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: May-30-2014

Court: Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Section 36, Section 33(5, Section 33, the HVAT Act, section 61, the HGST Act, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 25, section 4, Section 20

DATE: 2013 1, 2003, 26.03.2009, 2009, 2013 2, sixty days, the year 2005-06, the Assessment year of 2005-06, 2013 3 ii, 1973, 2013 4, 1898, quarterly, 2013 5, 1948, April 7, 2000, 2013 6

CARDINAL: 2013(O&M, 03.04.2012, 20.03.2009, two, 2005].139, one, 34, 2, 1961].12, 5

ORG: 30.5.2014 M/s Star Rice Industries, Additional Advocate General, the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, Haryana Tax Tribunal, The Assessing Authority, the Assessing Authority, the Sales Tax, Court, the Learned Authorities, Division Bench, the Division Bench, Haryana General Sales Tax Act, Haryana Value Added Tax, State of Haryana, Oswal Agro Mills Ltd.’s, the Appellate Authority, State of Haryana).9, Joint Excise, the Haryana Tax Tribunal

PERSON: Haryana, JUSTICE, GUPTA, JUSTICE FATEH, Alok Mittal, Pardeep Singh, Chandigarh, Haryana Act No.10, Diwakar Gulati, Poonia, Hemant Gupta, J., Naranbhai Patel’s, Diwakar Gulati 2014.05.31 14:32, MAY30 2014

WORK_OF_ART: 33 (5, 8…

GPE: Khazan, Vitthalbhai

PERCENT: 25%

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //