*** Vs. Unknown - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: May-29-2014

Court: Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Constitution, Article 335 of the Constitution, the Constitution Bench

ORG: C.W.P No.8244 of, C.W.P No.8244 of, National Hydro Electric Power Corporation Limited, C.W.P No.5397, National Hydro Electric Power Corporation Limited, National Hydro Electric Power Corporation Limited, Reporters, Digest, TE, State of Andhra Pradesh, 2008)3 Supreme Court, Lordships, the Selection Committee, the Selection Committee, the Selection Committee, Division Bench, Court, The State of Punjab, Court, Court, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Scheduled Castes (, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Scheduled Castes (, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Court, Commission, Union of India, T. Sundararaman, SC48the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Public Service Commission, Commission, Court, the Supreme Court, Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission, Lordships, Court, Commission, Commission, Commission, Ex-Servicemen, Tej Prakash Pathak, Rajasthan High Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the State of, the Punjab Civil Services, Judicial Branch, the State Government, The State Government, The High Court, Court, State, Lordships, Others v. Union of India, Durgacharan Misra, State, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, High Court, Court, Subash Chander Marwaha & Ors, the Punjab Civil Service, Judicial Branch, the High Court, High Court, the High Court, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, Government, the Kumar Kishan Government, the High Court, OBC, the High Court, Commission, OBC, a Competition Commission, Commission, Commission, the Civil Engineers, Civil Engineering, Electrical Engineering,, Communication Engineering, kk

DATE: 2008, May 29, 2014 1, 2008, 2009, 2009, 2008, 2008, 5397, 10298, 2009, 2008, the previous year, 2008, 2008, 1997, 08.01.1998, 1998, 24.02.1998, 2008, 2008, 2008, 49, 2008, 3372, 1974, 2008, 1984, 1985, 1987, 2008, 1974, 2008, 2008, May 29 , 2014

NORP: Girish, Sikhs, Mandamus

PERSON: Kumar Gupta, C.W.P No.10298, Kumar Mall, Rajiv Atma Ram, Vijay Sharma, Lokesh Sinhal, Kumar Kishan 2014.05.29, Lovekesh Kumar, Lovekesh Kumar, Backward Classes, Shri Bains, Backward Classes, Articles 14, Vir Sharma, Majhbi Sikhs, Shri, Kishan, Kumar Kishan, Haryana, Versus Navnit, Kumar Potdar, Kumar Kishan, Yogesh Yadav v. Union, Haryana v. Subash Chander Marwaha, Chander Marwaha, P.K. Ramachandra Iyer, Chandra Shukla v. Union, Chander Marwaha, C. Channabasavaiah v. State of Mysore, Bench, Kumar Kishan, Yogesh Yadav's, Haryana, Kumar Kishan

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 56, 57, 55, only 8, K.Manjusree, 512, 30.11.2004, 4, 16, 5, 27, 62, less than half, 6, 3, 4, one, 7, 3, 4, one, 1:3-4, 49, 40, one, 3, 3, 8, 56, 8, K.Manjusree, 2013(4, K.Manjusree, 13, 21, machinery.16, 3, 9, 15, 40, Only 7, 12, one, 17, 3, 4, 10, 3, 8, 8, one, one, one, 10(ii, 11, one, 16, 12, K.Manjusree

PERCENT: 60%, 60%, 55%, 60%, 60%, 45%, 55%, 45%, 55%, 45%, 55%, 65%, 70%, 65%, 65%

GPE: Singh v. State of Punjab, Balmikis, Singh, Manjusree, Subash, Orissa, Subash, India, India, the State of

ORDINAL: third

WORK_OF_ART: Ashok Kumar Yadav

MONEY: 60 marks, 55 per cent