Alka Gupta Vs. Medical Council of India and anr

Decided On : May-05-2014

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 24(2, Section 24(2, Section 24(2, Section 24(2, Section 33, Section 33(m, Section 27, the Bengal Medical Act, Section 26 of the Act, Section 26 of the Act, Section 25, Section 26 of the Act of, Section 24(2, the Bengal Medical Act, Article 141 of the Constitution, Section 24(2

ORG: 889/2013 & CM APPL, MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA, ANR, Date of Decision %, the Ethics Committee, Medical Council of India, MCI, Board of Governors, MCI, the Government of NCT, the Delhi Medical Council, DMC, MCI, Clause 8.8 of, Indian Medical Council, DMC, MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA, ANR, Adv, Adv, Court, the Indian Medical Council Act, the Roster Bench, Court, Court, Indian Medical Council Act, MCI, Court, Calcutta High Court, unconstitutional.7, the State Council, MCI, Medical Council, MCI, Banerjee, the Central Government, Medical Council of India, Appellate Authority, Register, the State Council, the Medical Council of India, the Medical Council of India, the State Government, Council, State, the Government of West Bengal, Health and Family Welfare Department, the Writ Court, the Division Bench of, Calcutta High Court, Medical Council of India Vs, West Bengal & Ors, Parliament, Council, the Supreme Court, Moloy Ganguly v. Medical Council of India and Ors, Apex Court, the Supreme Court, the Medical Council of India:“8.7, the Medical Council of India, State Medical Council, MCI, the Medical Council of India, the State Medical Council, the State Medical Council, MCI, the Ethics Committee of the Council, the Office of the Medical Council of India, the Supreme Court, Supreme Court, the Medical Council of India, Supreme Court, Appellate Authority, the Supreme Court, SLP, West Bengal & Ors, Apex Court, the Division Bench of Calcutta High Court, Medical Council of India Vs, West Bengal & Ors, State Government of West Bengal, the Government of West Bengal, Department of Health and Family Welfare, the Ethics Committee, MCI, Clause 8.8 of the Regulations, State Medical Councils, the Supreme Court, the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India under Section 24(2, the Central Government, MCI, Court.14, MCI, Clause 8.8, Calcutta High Court, MCI, the Division Bench of Calcutta High Court, the Apex Court, Calcutta High Court, MCI, DMC, Court, Calcutta High Court, Supreme Court's, Calcutta High Court, the Superior Court, the Superior Court, the Supreme Court, Shree Chamundi Mopeds Ltd., Church of South India Trust Association, the Apex Court, the High Court, the Apex Court, the High Court, Court, Clause 8.8, the Supreme Court, the Calcutta High Court, the Supreme Court, Shree Chamundi Mopeds Ltd., Church of South India Trust Association, the Ethics Committee of MCI, Board of Governors, MCI, CM Appl, No.1689/2013

DATE: 1689/2013, April, 2014, May, 2014, 27th October, 2012, 10th December, 2012, 5th May, 2009, 28th May, 2009, 10th June, 2009, 2002, 2002, 7th June, 3rd December, 2013, 10th January, 2014, 1334/2013, 1956, 16.01.2014......., 1956, 1956").6, 10 th January, 2014, 1956, 2009, 17th February, 2010, 1956, 2002, 2002, sixty days, 60 days, 60 days, 1956, 2006(4, 2005, 2002, 1914, 1956, 1999, 2004, 1914, 29th September, 2011, 2012, 2000, 2003, 49022, a period of, six months, 6th November, 2011."10, 12th December, 2011, 11th May, 2009, 12th December, 2011, 11.6.2009, today, 2002, December, 2011, 2002, 1956, 1956, August, 2010, 17th February, 2010, 20th February, 2013, 17th February, 2010, 7th June, 2010, 2007, 1992, 1992, existence.................13, 1956, 27th October, 2012, 10th December, 2012

PERSON: Anil Goel, Ashwani Goel, Maninder Singh, T. Singhdev, Mohammad Ali Choudhary, Rabin Majumdar, D.K. Pradhan, Karan Bharihoke, Eklavya Bahl, Pooja Bhatia, MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, S.P. Manchanda, Etiquette, S.P. Manchanda, GUPTA, Anil Goel, Adv, Ashwini Goel, Rajeev Kumar, Ratnakar Maltiyar, Ashish Kumar, Avijit Mani Tripathi, G.P. MITTAL, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, Maninder Singh, Rupa Basu, Rupa Basu, Maninder Singh, P.C.Kesavan Kuttynayar, Harish Bhalla, Rupa, Maninder Singh, Rupa Basu, Maninder Singh, Rupa Basu, Maninder Singh, Karan Bharioke, Pooja Bhatia, S.P. Manchanda, Karan Bharioke, Karan Bharioke, S.P. Manchanda, Rabin Majumder, S.P. Manchanda, Rabin, Pijush Kanti Chowdhury Vs, Pijush Kanti Chowdhury, Madras, Pijush Kanti Chowdhury

FAC: R-2, Registrar

CARDINAL: 17, 05, three, No.2, No.2, 2010.3, 3, 48, 8, 41, 8.8, 8.8, 12, No.2, No.2, No.2, 2, 10, 12, 2, 999

NORP: Indian

GPE: Delhi, Adv., W.P. No.9740(W, SCC327(paragraphs 4,15,16, W.P.C.

WORK_OF_ART: Regulations

LOC: Single Judge's, Single, Single Judge's

PRODUCT: Rule 8.8 of the Regulation of 2002, Rule 8.8 of the Regulation of 2002, Clause 8.8, Clause 8.8

ORDINAL: 4th