Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Labh Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Decided On : Apr-28-2014

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Section 31, Section 32, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 32, Section 2(c, Section 3(1, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Section 32, Article 62 of the Schedule, the Limitation Act, Section 31, Article 137, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Article 137, Section 32, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Article 62, Article 137 of the Limitation Act, Article 62, Section 32, Article 62, Section 31, Section 32, Section 32, Section 32, Section 31, Section 32, Section 29 and Section 31, Section 31, Section 29, Section 29 and Section 31, Section 31, section 29, section 69, the Full Bench, Section 32, the Limitation Act, Section 32, the Limitation Act, Section 32, Section 31, Section 32

PERSON: Labh Singh, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, JUSTICE ARUN, Rahul Sharma, B.S.Sidhu, KISHAN KAUL, Labh Singh, Rs.5,60,000/-, xx xx xx, xx xx xx, Jagdish Rai, xx xx xx, Schedule, Schedule, Mohamad Amin, Gar Re-Rolling Mills, Haryana 176, KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE2804.2014

CARDINAL: CORAM:-, No.2, No.2, No.4, two, 14:39, 15.4.2003, half, 14:39, 20.1.2014, 14:39, 28.3.2014, No.2, 3, 2.4.2014, 14:39, 2, 14:39, 14:39, one, 29, 1, 2, 55, 14:39, 1997(6, 14:39, 14:39, two, 14:39, No.2, 14:39, 14:39

ORG: the Punjab Financial Corporation, District Mansa, No.2-Corporation, Chand Parkash, No.2-Corporation, No.2-Corporation, the State Financial Corporation Act, No.2-Corporation, No.2-Corporation, Corporation, Respondent No.2- Corporation, Rs.2,80,000/-, No.2-Corporation, the Board of Directors, Chand Parkash, 11.2.2014, the Financial Corporation, the Financial Corporation, the Financial Corporation, Chand Parkash, the State Government, the State Government, the Small Industries Bank, the Small Industries Bank, the Small Industries Bank, the Small Industries Development Bank of India, the Small Industries Development Bank of India Act, The Haryana Financial Corporation, the Supreme Court, Maharashtra State Financial Corporation, Ashok K. Agarwal & Ors, SC, Sections 4 to 24, Asia Resorts, Usha Breco Ltd., SC, Chand Parkash, State, SC, State Financial Corporation, the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, Fatmabai Ibrahim, Chand Parkash, the Supreme Court, Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corp.v, SC, Civil Court, Corporation, Financial Corporation, Court, Haryana Financial Corporation Ltd., Chandigarh versus Chand Parkash, the Division Benches, Court, Bench, Chand Parkash, Financial Corporation, Bench, YES/NO Chand Parkash

DATE: 1990, 29.3.1990, 15.11.1992, more than a decade, 1951, 22.3.2006, 23.8.2006, 30.5.2007, 11.3.2008, 1990, 1996, the next date, 2.3.2009, 1963, 2008, 50, 12 years, 2006, 1584, 2002, 1999, 1305, 1968, 12 years, 1994, 2151, 1882”

NORP: Rs.2,80,000/-

QUANTITY: 5x10 square feet

GPE: Mansa, Tehsil, Kerala

EVENT: CWP-8891-2007 - 2, CWP-8891-2007 - 3, CWP-8891-2007 - 4, CWP-8891-2007 - 5, CWP-8891-2007 - 6 - Bank, CWP-8891-2007 - 7, CWP-8891-2007 - 8, CWP-8891-2007 - 9, CWP-8891-2007 - 10, CWP-8891-2007 - 11 - Bags and Cartons, CWP-8891-2007 - 12

TIME: No.4/mortgagor

PERCENT: 17.5%, 1%, 17.5%

WORK_OF_ART: 32G. Recovery of amounts due to

PRODUCT: Chand Parkash, Part-5, Bench

ORDINAL: second

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //