Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Manjeet Singh Vs. State of H.P.

Decided On : Apr-25-2014

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 302 IPC, Section 324 IPC, Section 27 of Arms Act, Section 302, Section 34, Section 302, Section 27, the Arms Act, Section 114, Section 302, Section 307 IPC, Section 313 Cr, Section 96, Section 97, Section 99, Section 102, Section 96 to, Section 99, the Indian Penal Code, Section 300, Section 304, Section 302, Section 304, Section 324, Section 27 of the Arms Act, Section 302, Section 304, Section 324, Section 27 of the Arms Act

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1695 OF2005MANJEET, SINGH, the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, the High Court, the Trial Court, the Trial Court, the Trial Court, The Trial Court, Hotel Apsara, Budhi Singh, the Hotel Apsara, Hotel, Hotel Basant, Hotel, Hotel Apsara, Hotel, the Hotel Apsara, Hotel, Hotel, Hotel, “Carbine Ka Kamal Dekhao, I.G.M.C. Hospital, Pradeep, House, Hotel, Hospital, Hospital, IPC, F.I.R. No.1/2001.4, Medical Examination of, Romi Kapoor:“Local Examination 1, A. CLW1, Nos.1 &amp, MLC Ext, CLW, MLC Ext, MLC Ext, linear, Additional Station House, The Ballistic Expert, Additional Sessions, the High Court, Trial, IPC, IPC, IPC, IPC, IPC, Court, held:“6, State of Bihar, Court, Court, Manjit, Chowkidar, Court, Manjit, IPC, IPC, IPC, IPC, IPC, the Trial Court, H.P. Respondent(s, JUSTICE, Respondent(s, Adv, Bench, IPC, IPC, IPC, the Trial Court, P.A. COURT

PERSON: JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J.The, Jai Pal, Budhi Singh, Jai Pal, Budhi Singh(PW.8, Jai Pal, Cart Road, Romi Kapoor, Pawan Kumar, Jai Pal, Budhi Singh, Manjeet Singh, Balraj, Surender Kumar, Jai Pal, Manjeet Singh, Jai Pal, Jai Pal, Jai Pal, Pawan Kumar, Romi Kapoor, Pawan Kumar, Jai Pal, Roshan, Jai Pal, Balraj, Surender Kumar, Rajnish, Jai Pal, Balraj, Surender Kumar, Jai Pal, Pawan Kumar, Rintu, Balraj, Jai Pal, Jagdish Ram, Kumar, Jagdish Ram, Jai Pal, V.K. Mishra, V.K. Mishra, M.P. Singh(PW.1, M.P. Singh, Pawan Kumar, M.P. Singh, Jai Pal, Dinesh Rana, Balraj, Dinesh Rana, Surender Kumar, Rajneesh Sharma, Carbine-Ex, memo Ex, Gulam Mohammad(PW.26, Gulam Mohammad(PW.26, Gulam Mohammad(PW.26, Balraj, Surinder Kumar, Balraj, Surinder Kumar, Manjeet Singh, Balraj, Surinder Kumar, George Dominic Varkey, SCC275, Moti Singh v. State, Jai Pal(PW.5, Romi Kapoor, Pawan Kumar, Satish Kumar, Charanjeet Singh, Rajender Singh, Jai Pal, Romi Kapoor, Pawan Kumar, Satish Kumar, J.(A.K. PATNAIK, JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA HON'BLE, R.K. AGRAWAL, Appellant(s, Pragati Neekhra, Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, A.K. Patnaik, Manjeet Singh

DATE: 18th October, 2004, 2002, 27th March, 2002, 2001, one year, six months, one month, three months, one month, 31st December, 2000, 1st, the same day, the same day, 1st January, 2001, 1st January, 2001, 6 hours.10, 1959, 1971, 2002, 2000, seven years, seven years, six months, 1695, today, seven years, six months

GPE: Shimla, PW.8, Deep Chand, Deep Chand, Carbine, Rintu, Romi Kapoor, CLW15, P.C., The State of Kerala

TIME: about 9 p.m., 12 o’clock, 24 hours, about 5.55 p.m., about 4.35 a.m., six months.27

EVENT: New Year

NORP: Rajnish, Rajnish, Rajnish, Rajnish, Rajnish, Rajnish, Satish

FAC: the Hall of the Hotel, Romi Kapoor, the Hall of the Hotel, the Hall of the Hotel, the Hall of the Hotel

CARDINAL: one, two, one, 307, 323, two, 2, 2, 1, 2, 24, 24, One, Six, Six, two, 307, two, 302, 307, 307, two, as many as 26, two, two, two, 102, 106, 3, three, 21, 9, 4, 24, two, one, about 5, 4

QUANTITY: one centimeter, 1.5 cm, 18 cm, 1 cm x &, 0.5 cm 1 cm, approximately 2.5 cm, approximately 5 cm, 1 cm 0.5 cm 1 cm, 1 cm X05 cm, 1 cm X05 cm, 4 cm 1 cm, 1.5 cm x 1.5 cm, 3.5 cm x 2 cm, 3 cm, 1.5 cm x 1 cm x 0.5 cm

MONEY: 189

ORDINAL: 2nd, fifth, fifth, Secondly, first, secondly, thirdly, 4th

LOC: Dental Surgeon

WORK_OF_ART: SCC494 this Court

PRODUCT: Manjit, NO.10 SECTION IIB

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //