Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Kunduru Venkat Red Vs. Kondapally Upender Reddy and Other
Decided On : Jul-19-2013
Court : Andhra Pradesh
LAW: Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 166, Rule 476, Section 166 of the 1988 Act, Section 158, Section 166 of the 1988 Act, Section 158, Section 166 of 1988 Act
DATE: 2013, M.V.O.P.No.594 of 2000, 14.8.1999, 1999, 2000, 1988, 1988, 14 days, 1989, 1989, 1989, 1989, 1989, 14 days, 14 days, 07-2013
PERSON: Appellant Kondapally, Prabhakar Rao Counsel, Sri Ravi Kanth, P. NAVEEN, RAO CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL, P. NAVEEN RAO
ORG: Respondents Counsel, the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-Principal District, Warangal, Tribunal, Regional Engineering College, Warangal, Honda, New India Assurance Company Limited, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicle Rules, Tribunal, First Information Report, First Information Report, the Hon'ble supreme Court, Claims Tribunal, Claims Tribunal, the Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicle Rules, the Motor Vehicle, the First Information Report, Claims Tribunal, FIR, Tribunal, FIR, the Claims Tribunal on the ground, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, FIR, FIR, FIR, FIR, FIR, FIR, FIR, FIR, FIR, FIR, the Claims Tribunal, the High Court, Suresh, High Court, FIR, petition.14, the First Information Report, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Tribunal, First Information Report, Tribunal, Tribunal
CARDINAL: No.3, 4, 14.7.1999, 30.7.1999, 1, 2, 1, 2, three, 2, 3, 9, 1)An, 1, 2, 1, 4, 6, 476, 7, 6, 476, 14.7.1999
TIME: about 6.00 p.m.
GPE: no.3
ORDINAL: Third, Third, first
WORK_OF_ART: Copy of the First Information Report
NORP: Indian