Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Hindustan Lever Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Kolkata – Ii, Kolkataand anr.

Decided On : Feb-26-2014

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Section 263, the Income Tax Act, Section 43(6, Section 263, Section 32, Section 32, Section 32, section 32, Section 119, Section 32, Section 43 of the Act, section 47, Section 32, Section 43(6).From, Section 32

ORG: KOLKATA& ANR, Advocate For Respondent, Advocate The Court, Tribunal, Legislature, CIT, Tribunal, the Learned Tribunal, Parliament, Circular, CBDT, Finance, Direct Taxes, Circular, Parliament, Circular, CBDT, Union of India & Anr, Azadi Bachao Andolan & Anr, Court, Baleshwar Bagarti, Court, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Crawford on Statutory Construction, the Learned Tribunal, the Learned Tribunal

NORP: Hon'ble, Indian, Statute, K.P.Varghese v. ITO, Indian, GIRISH

ORDINAL: 26th, third, third, third, third, third

DATE: February, 2014, any previous year, previous year, the previous year, a particular assessment year, 1st April, 1997, the year 1994-95, the previous year, a previous year, a previous year, a year, 18th February, 1998, 1996, the previous year, that previous year, a previous year, 1962, a year, any previous year

PERSON: J.P. Khaintan, S.Basu, Khaitan, Bill, Appendix, Khaitan, Nizumuddin, Khaitan, Khaitan, Khaitan, J.

CARDINAL: transferee, 23.2, 1, 263, two

MONEY: fifty per cent, No.2) Act, fifty per cent

PRODUCT: Notes

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //