Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Petta Satya Govinda Ramachandra Rao @ Ba Vs. Yarlagadda Vijaya Kumar Andanothe

Decided On : Feb-26-2014

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: Section 138, Section 200, Section 190(1)(a, Section 204 Cr, Section 143, Section 138, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 143(1, Section 372 Cr, Act 66 of 1988, Section 144, Section 144, Section 204 Cr, Section 70, Section 71 Cr, Section 81 Cr, Section 88 Cr., Section 378(4, Section 384(2, Section 386 Cr, Section 378 Cr, Section 372 Cr, Section 374 Cr, Section 372 Cr, Section 386, section 423, Section 385 Cr, Section 482 Cr, Section 482 Cr, Section 482, Section 151 C.P.C.At, Section 385(1, Section 386 Cr, Section 27, Section 106, Section 114, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 27, Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act, Order V Rule 20 C.P.C, Section 144, Section 88 Cr, Section 385, Section 144, Section 386 Cr, Section 70, Act 5, Section 437A, Section 437-A Cr., Section 437-A Cr., Act 5, Section 378(4, Section 374(3, Act 5, Section 372 Cr, Section 372 Cr., Section 372, Section 372 Cr, Section 2(w)(a, Section 2(d, Section 374, Section 372 Cr, Section 378(4, Section 372 Cr., Article 20(1, Article 11, Article, Section 372 Cr, Section 378(4, Section 378(4, Section 372 Cr, Section 378(4, Section 482 Cr, Section 378(4, Section 372, Section 374(3, Section 372 Cr, Section 378(4, Section 372, Section 372 Cr, Section 372 Cr, Section 378(4, Section 2(w)(a, Section 372 Cr, Section 372 Cr, Section 372 Cr, Section 378(4, Section 372 Cr, Section 378(4, Section 372, Section 381, Section 210, Section 381(2, Section 372 Cr, Section 378(4, Section 482 Cr, Section 372, Section 377 Cr, Section 372 Cr, Section 378(4, Section 372 Cr, Section 372 Cr, Section 381(2, Section 482, Section 378 Cr, the Amended Act 5 of, Section 372, Section 372, Act 5, Section 138 of N.I Act, Section 138 of N.I.Act, Section 372 Cr, Section 374, Article 114, the Indian Limitation Act, Section 372 Cr, Section 374 Cr, Section 390 Cr, Section 372 Cr, Section 437-A Cr., Section 437-A Cr., Section 144, Section 386 Cr, Section 386, Section 378, Section 372 Cr, Section 378, Section 372 Cr, Section 372 Cr, Section 401, Section 397 Cr, Section 378(4, Section 378 Cr, Section 372 Cr, Section 372 Cr, Section 374 and, Section 437A, Section 144 N.I.Act, Section 378 Cr, Section 378(4, Section 138, Section 144, Section 386 Cr, Section 53, Section 144, Order V Rule, Section 482 Cr, Section 390, Section 70(2, Section 70(2, Section 390, Section 6(a, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 88, Section 89, Section 386 Cr, Section 437-A Cr., Section 446, Section 372, Section 437-A Cr., Section 378(4, Section 446, Section 229A I.P.C, Section 372 Cr, Section 381 Cr, Section 482 Cr, Section 88, Section 386 Cr, Section 437-A Cr.

ORG: HONOURABLE Dr., RAO, SC, ALD, AP, ALD, the V Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Judicial, Metropolitan Magistrates, Sections 260, the High Court, this High Court, Court, State, Court, BPFI, NI, Sections, Magistrate, Court of Session, the postal department, Court, the Magistrate Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, State, Advocate/s, Court, the Grounds of Appeal, Court, the Apex Court, Syam Deo, Syam Deo, the High Court, Court, Justice, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Court, 03.04.2012 this Court, Registry, Court, reveRs.with, the Apex Court, Alipuram, Magistrate, Court, N.I.Act, the Apex Court, Allahabad High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court Free Legal Aid Committee, Magistrate, Court of Session, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Court of Session, P.C-, Court, Court, V. State, Court, the High Court, the Sessions Court/High Court, Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, Court, Court of Session, Court, the High Court, Court of Session, Court, High Court, the High Court, the Court of Session, the Court of Session, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Court of Session, Court, Metropolitan Magistrate, Magistrate, the Court of Session, the Apex Court, the Court of Session, the High Court, The Apex Court, Shashikant, Shah BKOM &, G Factory, the Apex Court's, Dental Council of India V. Hari Prakash21, Statute, Union of India V. Filip23, Grasim Industries V. Collector of customs24, ".no, Statute, Legislature, Government of India, the Law Commission of, National, Criminal Justice (Ministry of Home, Court, Gujarat High Court, the Bombay High Court, Punjab &, Tata Steel LTD.kesar, the Judgment of the Kerala High Court, Court, the High Court, Court, High Court, the Court of Session, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Justice, Court, the Court of Session, the Court of Session, Justice, Court, Court, the Division Bench, Court, the Apex Court's, The National Commission for Women V. State, Court, Court, the Court of Session, Division, Court, Section 409(2, Additional Sessions, the State Government, the High Court, Court, Court, Additional Sessions, Court, the Court of Session, the High Court, the Court of Session, the High Court, Justice, Magistrate, the Court of Session, the Court of Session, Court of Session, the Bombay High Court, Court, N.I.Act, Advocate, the Court of Sessions, State, Central Legislature, Court of Sessions, State, Central Legislature, Court, U.S Supreme Court, Government, Court, Plowden &, Parliament, SOUL, Statute, Statute, The Heydons Rule, Heydons, Parliament, Indian Courts, Courts of Equity, the Common Law Courts, State of Punjab V. Devans Modern Bewaries, Apex Court, Corpus Juris Civilis, Hart's, Justice, Society, Court, Justice, Court, ".economics, Anglo Saxon, the High Court's, Court, Court of Session, State Legislature, the Central Legislature, this High Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Magistrate, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Registry, Public Prosecutor, Court, Court, Court, Hindu Minority Guardianship Act, ".the, the Apex Court, Githa Hariharan V. Reserve Bank, State, Public Prosecutor, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Magistrate, the fiRs.appellate Court, Court, Court, the High Court, Court, the Court of Session, Court, the Metropolitan Sessions, the Additional Metropolitan Sessions, the Sessions Division, Court, RAO

DATE: 2005, 26-02-2014, 2439 3, 2004).SCC7747. 2003(1, 10. 1982(2, para-12) 12, 1990, 366 29, 425 31, 2012, 2005, C.C.No.77 of 2000, 1881, 2005, 13.03.2012, 1881, 1981, chapter-17, 2002, 1973, 81, 88, No.1680 of 2013, years, 13.03.2012, the 1st, 26.03.2012, 7 days, 2009, 2005, 2009, six months, 2009, 2009, 1948, 2009, 2012, 24.01.2012, para-10, 31.12.2009, 9726, 2009, the acquittal few days, 2009, 2009, 47, the year 1947, the year 1981, 1524-76, 44, 49, minORS.property, 2009, 6 months, 6 months, 23.06.2006, the year 2005

PERSON: Satya Govinda Ramachandra Rao @ Babji, Appellant Yarlagadda Vijaya, Kumar, K.Srinivasa Rao Counsel, ALD(Crl, JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO, Dilip Kulakarni V. Bahadurmal, P.C.It, 385 Cr., P.C.It, Bani Singh V. State, Ram Naresh Yadav, Surya Baksh Singh V. State, Singh V. U.P3, the Bani Singh, bench, V. Sankaran V.Bala5, Kumari V. T.Subbarama Naidu6, Geeth Sangeeth, Cr, Gupta V. Prakash Chandra, Cr, Jamshedpur V. State, XIV Cr, XV Cr, P.C.It, bench, Ratanlal V. State14, Kumar V. Om Prakash, bench, Lal V. Gouranga Chandra16, Kale V. Union, Swaran, Sundera Rao V. State, Reddy V. State, Makwana V. State, Balasaheb, Haryana High, Singh V. Atma Tube Products, Rai Bhole27, John V. Shibu, D.Sudhakar V. Panapu Srinivasulu @ Evone Water Srinivasulu28, Surya Baksh Singh, D.Sudhakar, P.C.It, M.Narayanamma V. Satyanarayana30, Balasaheb Rangnath Khade V. State, Frankfurter of, Columbia Law Reports, Frankfurter, Law, Reeddickerson, Skill, Law, Law, Goddard, Law, Ciero, Justinian, Law, Law, Law, Cardozo, Max, Statutes, XXIX Cr, Surya Baksh Singh, Bailable Warrant, Court Judgment, B.SIVA

CARDINAL: 1. 2005(2, 171 2, 1996).SCC3724, 2006).SCC4565, 1999).SCC5106, AIR(SC)2004-408, 201, 13, 1983).SCC17714, 2013)11, 2005).SCC40017, 1990).SCC36618, 2001).SCC6122, 2002).SCC53323, 2002).SCC29725, 2013(3, 27, 2011(2, 2013(1, 18, 2013(1, 30, 32, 2004)11 SCC2633, 2005).SCC31334, 06.02.2003, 261, 461, 464, 465, 2, 11.07.2005, 31.12.2009).The, 3, 01.04.1989, 138, 142, 06.02.2003, 143, 147, 138, 142, 375, 5, Three, three, 13, 6, three, 1991(1, two, 8), 5, 10, 375, 31.12.2009, 12, 3, two, 12, two, one, two, 14, two, two, three, 15, 31.12.2009, one, two, 16, 22, 17, three, 15 to 18, 18, 19, 274, 20, 69, 21, 22, 23, 24, two, one, 25, 13, more than one, 21.10.2010, 115, 28, 385, 387, 29, 390, 393, 394, 390, 393, 394, 30, 31, 527, 174, 34, 35, 36, two, one, 38, 39, 41, 42, 637, four, 318, quot;.Salus, 45, 47, 7, 48, 50, 51, one, 15.02.2013, 23.01.2013, 26.06.2013, 70-73, one, 81, 1, 2, 446, 57, 81, 26-02-2014

ORDINAL: 1st, 1st, Second, 1st, 1st, 1st, 1st

GPE: Kishan, K.Bhaskaran, M.A.Ghani V. P.Rami Reddy7, Visakhapatnam, Rajendra, Cr, Cr.P.C, Rohitash, Padma, Tamil, Bhavaben, Dineshbhai, Kerala, Delhi, Cr, the United Kingdom, Cr, Visakhapatnam, Cr, P.C., Cr, Visakhapatnam

NORP: addressee, addressee, mother&quot

EVENT: General Clauses Act, the Human Rights

FAC: Raj Narain Saxena V. Bhim Sen9, Rohitesh Kumar, B.P.A Anand V. S.A.Reddy33

WORK_OF_ART: Judgment or Order, the Constitution of India, The Family Story, Maths

LANGUAGE: English, English

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //