Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Jaffar Vs. the Dhanalakshmi Bank Ltd.

Decided On : Jan-30-2014

Court : Kerala

LAW: Section 482, the SARFAESI Act, Section 13, the SARFAESI Act, Section 14 of the Act.4, the SARFAESI Act, Section 13 of the SARFAESI Act, Section 69 or Section 69-, Section 17, Section 17-A]., the Companies Act, Section 529 of the Companies Act, Section 529-A of that Act, Section 529-A of the Companies Act, Section 14 of the Act, Section 13, Section 14, the SARFAESI Act, the SARFAESI Act, Section 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 17, the SARFAESI Act, Section 13(4, Section 14, the SARFAESI Act, Section 17, the SARFAESI Act, Section 14, the SARFAESI Act, Section 13(4, Section 13(4, Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, Section 17, Section 13(8, Section 14, the SARFAESI Act, Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, Section 14 of the Act, Section 13 of the Act, Section 13, Section 14 of the Act, Section 13, the SARFAESI Act

GPE: K.RAMAKRISHNAN, SANKARAMANGALAM, K. RAMAKRISHNAN, Crl, Kanaiyalal, India

PERSON: JANUARY201410TH MAGHA, MC.No, PALAKKAD, SMT.AMBILY PREMKUMAR, Kss Crl, MC.No, Palakkad, Crl, M.C.No.4770/2013, Judicial Magistrate, quot;record date&quot, quot;amount outstanding&quot, Metropolitan Magistrate, Saraspathy Sundararaj, Sachdev, Others, Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, Palakkad, Crl, Sd/- K. RAMAKRISHNAN

DATE: 1935, 2/36B, 2014, this the 30th day of January, 2014, 2002, 2014 2, 1882, 4 of 1882, 2014 3, sixty days, one week, 2014 4, 2014 5, 1956, 1 of 1956, 1956, 1of 1956, 2014 6, 1956, 1 of 1956, 2014 7, 2014 8, 2011, 2014 9, 2013, 2014 10, a period of, one month, 2002, 2014 11, two months, the year 2012, the year 2013, 2014 12

CARDINAL: 938, 132/2012, 303, 938, 1, 1, 2, 4, 3, 2, 3-A, 2, 4, 2, one, 5, 4, 6, 4, 4, 8), 9, more than one, 4, less than three, 1, less than three-fourth, 10, 11, 4, 12, one, 13, 2, 6, 1, 2, 1, 3, 7, 3, 2, 226, 227, 4, 5

ORG: S/O.UMMER K.T, KURUPPAM THODIYI HOUSE, MELE PATTAMBI, BISMI TRADING COMPANY, PATTAMBI, THE DHANALAKSHMI BANK LIMITED., PATTAMBI, CRL, PALAKKAD, Kss "CR&quot, the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Bank, Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement, Court, Court, Crl, Bank, Enforcement of Security Interest, the Debts Recovery Tribunal, the Court of District, Crl, Crl, Crl, the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Crl, District Magistrate, Metropolitan Magistrate, the District Magistrate, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, District Magistrate, Crl, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, the District Magistrate, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, the District Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, Bank, Magistrate, Court, Sami v. Bank of India, the Division Bench, State Bank of India, Sami, Court, the Supreme Court, Maharashtra and Others, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Standard Chartered Bank, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the High Court, Bank, Magistrate, Bank, SARFAESI, Crl, Court, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court, Crl, Crl, Court, Court, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bank, Bank, Court, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bank, Standard Chartered Bank, P.S

ORDINAL: first, first, firstly, secondly, second, first

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //