Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Present: Mr. Pawan Kumar Hooda Advocate Vs. the Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal-cum-labour Court Panipat and

Decided On : Feb-12-2014

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution of India

DATE: 2014 1, 09.07.2001, 17.10.2007, 2014.02.19 15:10, 2014, 18.09.2007, 10.12.2007, 10.12.2007, 10.12.2007, 12.09.2007, 2014.02.19 15:10, 2014 3, five days, 10.12.2007, 18.10.2007, 10.12.2007, five days, 2014.02.19 15:10, 2014 4, 2014.02.19 15:10, 2014 5, 2014.02.19 15:10

ORG: 12.02.2014 Smt, Petitioner(s, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Respondent(s, the Labour Court, Panipat, Operator Assembly, the Labour Court, Notice, the Labour Court, The Labour Court, the Labour Court, Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Apex Court, Court, High Court, The High Court, Court, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, Labour Court

PERSON: Kamlesh Kumari, JUSTICE, Pawan Kumar Hooda, Unit Head, Gupta Shivani, Sunita Devi, JMIC, Ex, Gupta Shivani, Unit Head, Gupta Shivani, Surya Dev Rai, Chander Rai, Gupta Shivani, Gupta Shivani

GPE: Panipat, S.P.Sonepat, Sonepat

WORK_OF_ART: 05.07.2013 (Annexure P-1).whereby

CARDINAL: 18.09.2007, 18.10.2007, 18.09.2007, three, three, 6, two, one

PRODUCT: M-10

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //