Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Nanak Ram Jaisinghani Vs. Tilak Raj Salooja and ors.

Decided On : Jan-20-2014

Court : Delhi

LAW: this Regular Second Appeal, Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 106, Section 106, Section 106, Section 106, Section 106, Section 106, Order 7 Rule 7, Section 106, Section 106, Section 106, Order 7 Rule 7, Section 100

GPE: NEW DELHI, Delhi

PERCENT: 2014 %

ORG: NANAK, CPC, Court, Court, Court, Court, HUF, Court, UPC, Court, Court, Court, The Supreme Court, Nopany Investments, HUF, HUF, HUF, HUF, HUF, CPC, Legislature, CPC, Court, SLP, the Supreme Court, CPC

PERSON: Vinod Kumar, Sandeep Sethi, Amit Sethi, Puja Anand, Jasbir Singh Chadha, Anr, Jeevan Diesels, Jeevan Diesels, Santokh Singh, JANUARY20

CARDINAL: 1, 5.3.2013, three, 183, 7, 2, 7.7.2011.5

DATE: 1908, 1882, 1882, 1882, 2011, 1882, 1882, 15.7.2006, 15.7.2006, 15.7.2006, 2008, monthly, 15 days, 15 days, 2003, 15 days, 15 days, the year 2007, this date, 15 days, 15 days, the expiry of, 15 days

ORDINAL: second

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //