Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

M.P.Jewellers Vs. New M.P. Jewellers Chawk Bazaar

Decided On : Jan-10-2005

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

LAW: section 57, the Trade Marks Act, Order VI Rule 17, Madras 274, Madras 56, section 2(b, section 9, section 11

PERSON: Bench Sitting, S.Jagadeesan, ‘M.P. JEWELLERS, ‘M. P., Kolkata, M.P. JEWELLERS, M.P. JEWELLERS, M. P. Jewellers, Madan Mohan Pal, Madan Mohan Pal, Shri, V. Kalyan, Kumar Kisku, Kamaladevi Chordia V. P. Ganeshan, ¦, Bench, Justice Lentin, No.700543, Anr, mark ‘Peterscott, N. Natarajan, ‘Meen Mark Beedi, Tata Tea, Suruchi Tea, Madan Mohan Pal, M.P. JEWELLERS”, Madan Mohan Pal

DATE: 1999, 14.12.1999, about 1945, 1945, the year 1988-89, the year 1988-89, the year 2002-03, 1995, about May, 2001, 14, 1958, 11, the year 1992, June, 2004, the year 1978, about 2001, the year 1978, the year 1990-91, 1995-96, 1945, 1989, 11, 1843, 1994, 2004, 2004, 16-38, 1945, 1958, 7000542, 1989, 1999, 3/97, 1988-89, 2002-03, the year 1988-89, the year 2002-03, 14, 1990, 1958, 2004, 1990, 14, the year 1992, 1978, the year 1978, the year 1990-91 and 1991-92, the earlier years, the year 1992-93 to 1995-96, 1978, 1978, April, 1993, April, 1994, the year 1992, 14.12.1999

ORG: the Register of Trade Marks, the Registrar of Trade Marks, the Registrar of Firms, Ramakrishna Samadhi Road, Rs.1,11,00,739, M/s National MP Jewellers, M/s New MP Jewellers, the District Court, the District Court, the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, ‘M.P., Register, the Civil Court, Register, M.P. Jewellers, M.P. Jewellers, the District Court, M.P. Jewellers, P Jewellers, ‘New M P Jewellers, M.P. Jewellers, Rs.3,20,112, ‘M.P., the District Court, the Registrar of Trade Marks, the Supreme Court, AIR 1994 SC 1837, the Supreme Court, M.P. Jewellers, the Registrar of Trade Marks, the Register of Trade Marks, Parle Products, J.P. and Co., Mysore AIR 1972, SC, the Supreme Court, the Bombay High Court, AIR 1984 Bom.218, the Supreme Court, Court, Kerleys Law of Trade Marks and Trade Names 13th, the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, No.700544, ‘M.P., M.P., The High Court of Jammu, Mohan Meakin Ltd., V. Kashmir Dreamland Distillery, Madras High Court, Khoday Distilleries, V. Scotch Whisky Association, AIR 1999, the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, The Bombay High Court, Tata Tea Limited V. Suruchi Tea Company, Kashmir High Court, ‘M.P. Jewellers, the Register of Trade Marks, the West Bengal Shops and Establishments Act, 30.9.1992, the Registrar of Trade Marks, the Original Rectification Application, the Register of Trade Marks

NORP: No.690610, No.690610, Hiralalal, Rules, Bengali, jewellery

GPE: Kolkata, M.P. JEWELLERS, M.P. JEWELLERS, Hoogli, Kolkata, Hindi, Scotland, India, Jammu, Kolkata

CARDINAL: about 1997, 4/1996, 7.6.1996, ‘M.M.P, 12/2001, 27.11.2003, 9, 18(1, 2., 9,11, 18(1, 3, 4, 5., 6, two, 9, 18(1, 29, 1, 1, 2, 6, 578, 610, 8, one, two, one, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, about 50, 13, 321, 15, 8 to 10, 321, 16, 17, 18, 9, 4, 3, 4, 5, 9, 50, 24.7.1992, 2.7.92, 52, 19, 690610

FAC: Hooghly, Hooghly, M.M.P

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, first, second

MONEY: two marks, two marks

LANGUAGE: English

LOC: Kashmir, Basha Vs

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //