Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Nisar Enterprises Vs. Vikash Fashion Clothing (P) Ltd., and Others
Decided On : Aug-01-2008
Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
LAW: section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 5 of the Act, Order 22 Rule 9 of the Code, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 5, the Limitation Act
PERSON: S. Usha, Shri L. Ram Prasad, J. Daga, Goverdhan Sao, No.41, M. Krishnamurthy â, K.T. Thomas, Shakuntala Devi Jain V. Kuntal Kumari, Howrah Municipality
DATE: six days, 2003, 16.10.2007, 10.10.2007, 17.10.2007, 16.11.2007, 18.12.2007, 21.01.2008, six days, six days, 21.09.2007, 10.10.2007, 16.10.2007, more than six days, 2002, 130 days, 5 years, 3 years, 1998, 1999, 883 days, 9, these days, 12, 1969, 1006, 1972, 15 days
ORG: S.R.No.355/2007/, TM/IPAB, Registrar of Trade Marks, the Trade Marks Rules, the Registrar of Trade Marks, the Trade Marks Registry, Board, the Registrar of Trade Marks, this Appellate Board, Registry, the Trade Marks Registry, Board, the Registry of this Appellate Board, Registrar, Registry, the Apex Court, No.22, the High Court, the Supreme Court, The Trial Court, the High Court, Civil Revision, the Trial Court, High Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Time, Court, State of W.B. Vs, the Apex Court, Court, the Registrar of Trade Marks, Registry, the Trade Marks, Registrar, the Registry of this Appellate Board, the Registry of this Appellate Board, Registry
CARDINAL: 2, 21.09.07, 2, 50, 1, 50, 3., 21.09.2007, 1, 50, 4., 5., 6., 02.07.2008, 1, 8., 21.01.2008, 12.03.2008, 12.03.2008, 1, 9, 10, two, One, 3, 195, 2002(3, 417, No.3, one, 7, 123, 1, 8, 10, 9, 10, 11, 13, 12, 1, 1, 366, 13, 11, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 12, 1could, 1, 1
NORP: Rules, Rules
ORDINAL: first, first
PRODUCT: Shri Ashok
WORK_OF_ART: Balakrishnan Vs