Pharmacia and Upjohn Company Vs. Union of India, Through the Secretary, Department of Industry

Decided On : Feb-13-2013

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

LAW: Section 3(e

ORG: CIRCUIT, No.1466, The First Examination Report, United States Patent No.6074657, un, D4, Controller, un, D3, Controller, Property Appellate Board Order No.79/2011, Board, the First Examination Report, Windsurfing International Inc., Tabur, Technograph Printed Circuits Ltd., Rockley (Electronics) Ltd., AIR, Privy Council, Canadian General Electric Co. Ltd., Fada Radio Ltd., AIR 1982, SC, Bishwanath Prasad Radhey Shyam Vs, Hindustan Metal Industries, United States District Court, Unigene Laboratories, Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Apotex Corp. –, Richardson-Vicks Inc., Upjohn Co., Fed, Bayer Schering Pharm, AG, Fed, Newmann, J., United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit –, Pharmaceutical Compositions, un, un, un, un, Sustained-release”., un, un, un, un, un, un, un, un, PCT/US01/2603, D1, un, D1, un, POSITA, CCFA, D1, CCFA, CCFA, Court, Unigene Laboratories, Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Apotex Corp., BZK, Court, InBishwanath Prasad Radhey Shyam Vs, Hindustan Metal Industries, Technograph Printed Circuits Limited Vs, Rockley, Court, the Windsurfing Internation Inc., Tabur Marine, KSR, KSR, the US Supreme Court, KSR, IPAB, Sankalp Rehabilitation Trust Vs, Ors, Novelty, KSR, the US Supreme Court, Court, Court, KSR, Clapham, PHOSITA, KSR, the U.S.Supreme Court, Court, KSR, KSR, CCFA, CCFA, Controller, Controller, D1

PRODUCT: BENCH, Controller, Invention

CARDINAL: 25, One to Three, 2, 12.4.2005, 3., 7.10.2005, 1, 2, 4., 23.11.2007, 27.11.2007, 21.07.2009, five, 5., 6., as low as 0.00001:99.00000, one, 5, 8., 9, 10, 241, 11, 1.Intellectual, 2, four, 3., 4, 5, 6, 184, 6, 533, 122, 421, 575, 7, 27, 551, 12, 2., 13, three, 14, three, one, one, 15, 1, 2, three, one to three, 16, 17, 1, three, one, three, 2, 1, one, three, 3., 2, 4., 1, 5, 1, 6, 1, 4, 8, 4, 9, 4, 10, 4, 11, 9, 10, 12, 9, 50, 13, 9, about 100, about 200, 15, 18, one, 1, one, 19, One, one, 20, about 0.01:99.99, 21, 22, one, one, 23, 24, 25, one, One, one, one, about 0.01:99.99, 26, 27, 28, 13, 29, 30, two, one, 31, 32, 33, 34, four, 35, 550, one, two, 42, “He, one, 1., 2., 3., one, 4, 38, three, 10:90, about 20:80, 0.00001:99.9999, less than 0.01:99.99, 1, 39, 40, 41

PERSON: Prabha Sridevan, Controller, D2, No.2002/068065, D3, D2, D3, Susan M. Machkovech, D2, D2, D4, Thomas Thomas N Vs, Controller, Cotton L.J., Latham, Pat, Law, Cir, Barr Labs., Cir, Francis S. Gurley No.94-1025, Fig, Fig, wherein, wherein, wherein, wherein, wherein, wherein, wherein, CCFA, D2 – D2, D3 – D3, Francis S. Gurley, Thomas Thomas N, Unigene Labs Vs, CCFA, F. Hoffmann-La-Roche AG, PHOSITA, “no big deal”., Gurley, Controller

NORP: Designs, contra

DATE: 27/11/2006, WO 9420505, February, 2007, the same day, D3, D3, 1985, 1972, 1930, 1444, 1888, 1356, 1478, 1479, 1997, 1350, 2009, 14, 30 days, 60 days, 90 days, 10:90, 20:80, 5:95, 40:60, 27th November, 2006, 36

GPE: D4, D4, Great Britain, Blackey, New York, c)an, Teleflex, US

WORK_OF_ART: D4

LOC: the Southern District

EVENT: the Invention 1

PERCENT: 100 percent, 100 percent, 100 percent

TIME: about 10:90, about 10:90, about 10:90, about 10:90

QUANTITY: 20 mM