K.P. Raju Vs. Union of India, Represented by the Secretary Ministry of Defence and Others

Decided On : Jan-24-2012

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

LAW: Section 52(a, the Army Act, Section 164 of the Army Act, Section 34, Havildar, Subedar 315 Field Park Company, the Army Act, the Evidence Act, Rule 115

PERSON: Janardan Sahai, Sapper, Engr Regt, with:- COMMITTING THEFT OF PROPERTY BELONGING, Sleeping Bag, Parks, M.P.Krishnan Nair, K.M.Jamaludeen, Naib Subedar, QM Store, K.S.Saini, Gurdev Singh, Gurdev Singh, DTL Loc, Subedar LTM Pillai, Sapper Satheesan, Sapper Satheesan, Sapper Satheesan's, Kerosene Oil, QM Store, Sapper Satheesan, Subedar Pillai, Sapper KP Raju, Sapper Raju, Sapper Satheesan, Subedar Sukumaran, Satheesan, Havildar Narayan, Sapper KP Raju, Hav, Subedar Pillai, Subedar Pillai, Satheesan, Subedar Pillai, Subedar Pillai, Subedar Pillai, Sapper Satheesan, Havildar Narayan, Sapper Satheesan, Sapper Satheesan, Sapper Satheesan, Satheesan, Martial, Devilal Sahu, Rajasthan, Ex, Bega Ram, Mil, Ex, Sepoy Chander Singh, Major K.S.Raju

ORG: the Indian Army, Spr Name KP Raju, Pramod Kumar Vyas, Engineer, Ext, C Northern Command, Army, COAS, Ext, COAS, Writ Petition No.5120, COAS, P7, Ext, Ext, Writ Petition, No.24510 of 2006, Court, Ext, Tribunal, the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, Senior Panel Counsel, T.A., Ext, the Summary of Evidence, Ext, Ext, R4(c, the Summary of Evidence, Court, the Army Rules, the Summary of Evidence, the Summary of Evidence, R4(c, The Officiating Commanding Officer, Field Park Company, 409 Field Company Office, Sapper KP Raju, Sapper Shiv Prasad, Sapper KP Raju's, Sapper, KP Raju, Sapper KP Raju, Court of Inquiry, Sapper KP Raju, Field Park Company, KP Raju, R4(c, Sapper C.K.Satheesan, Court of Inquiry, C.K.Satheesan, Learned Senior Panel Counsel, S.Murugan, Sapper KP Raju's, KP Raju's, Senior Panel Counsel, Ext, KP Raju, the Summary of Evidence, the Summary of Evidence, the Summary of Evidence, Sapper C.K.Satheesan, Army, GCM, DCM, Court, Union of India, Union of India, Rajasthan 231, Division Bench, the Rajasthan High Court, Union of India, Army, the Summary of Evidence, the Summary of Evidence, Ext, Sapper C.K.Satheesan, Commanding Officer, Sapper C.K.Satheesan

DATE: 4.12.1989, 15 Oct 89, 2130, 9.12.1989, six months, 31st January 1990, 23rd March 1990, 13th December 1991, 1992, 13th December, 1991, November, 1998, 8th March 1999, 8th August, 2006, 8th March, 1999, 8th March,1999, 27.11.1989, 28.11.1989, 2007, 27.11.1989, October 1989, October 1989 night, 16th October 1989, 28.10.1989, 15.10.1989, 16th October 1989, November 1989, October 1989, 15.10.1989, 6th November, 1989, 21 days, November 1989, 16th October 1989, 15.10.1989, 28.10.1989, 16.10.1989, 16.10.1989, 2007, 27.11.1989, 28.11.1989, 27.11.1989, 28.11.1989., the year 1989, more than fourteen years, February 1990, a period of, six months

CARDINAL: 315, 409, 11, 3, 2, 1, 3, 2, 1, 04, 11, 11, No.2, two, one, 3., 28.11.1989, 4., 28.11.1989, 409, 11, 13, about 0800, one, one, 13, two, one, 409, 315, 409, 409, 5., 2, 6., 3, 27.11.1989, 28.10.1989, two, one, 27.11.1989, 27.11.1989, 419, 8, 115, 2, 2, 116, 4, 2009(2, 5, 1997(6, 643, 9, 27.11.1989, 28.11.1989, two, 9, 7, 9, 22(1, two, one

GPE: Field, L.J.

WORK_OF_ART: The Writ Petition, the Summary of Evidence, Summary of Evidence, the Summary of Evidence, the Summary of Evidence, Sapper Shiv Prasad, Summary of Evidence, the Summary of Evidence, the Summary of Evidence, Summary of Evidence, Summary of Evidence, Summary of Evidence, the Summary of Evidence, Summary of Evidence

ORDINAL: 9th, second, first, 16th, 15th, 6th, 15th, 6th, 3rd

LOC: Single, Single

PRODUCT: Rule 115 Sub-Rule(2, Subedar Ikambaram, Subedar Ikambaram

TIME: about 0930 hours, about 1030 hours, around 2230 hours, about 2245 hours, about 10 30 hours

MONEY: 409 Field Company, 409 Field Company

NORP: Rules