Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Damber Bahadur Chhetri Vs. State of Sikkim
Decided On : Apr-23-2010
Court : Sikkim
LAW: Section 302, Section 450, Section 34, Section 34 and Section 380, Section 34, Section 27, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 27, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act
PERSON: C. J., Dawa Tamang, Kishore Thapa, Kishore Thapa, Dambar, Damber, Stenographer, Sadar P. S. Gangtok, Damber Chettri, Dawa Tamang, bush, Dawa Tamang, Damber Chettri, Arjun Tamang......................Sd/-, L.D.C., Law Dett
CARDINAL: 1, one, as many as 19, 2, one, two, 3, 2, 2, 10, 23, 14.00, 29, 23, 10, 10, 2, 23, 4, 2, 5, 6, 2, 8, 2, 9, 26, 27, 25, 26, 27, 10, 2, 2, 2, 2, 11, 12, 2, 2, 13
ORG: Sadar Police Station, IPC, First Information Report, IPC, P.W. 6, Government, Maruti Taxi, Sadar Police Station, Sadar Police Station, EXT, Kishor Thapa, Dawa Tamang, Lall Bazar, Sheree Punjab Hotel, EXT, A.G. Office, CFSL, Sections 25, Sections 25, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate
ORDINAL: first, second
PRODUCT: P.W. 5
DATE: 7-8 days, 16th September, 2003, 2003, 2003, 18th September, 2003, 2003, 17th September, 2003, 1872, 26, 1882, 10 of 1882
TIME: about 5.30 p.m., the morning of 17th September, the morning of 19th September, the night, 16-9-, about 10.30 p.m., the night, 16-9-2003, the fateful night
GPE: Nepali, P.I., Fort St. George
LANGUAGE: English
FAC: Upper Tathangchen
WORK_OF_ART: Magistrate