Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Damber Bahadur Chhetri Vs. State of Sikkim

Decided On : Apr-23-2010

Court : Sikkim

LAW: Section 302, Section 450, Section 34, Section 34 and Section 380, Section 34, Section 27, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 27, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act

PERSON: C. J., Dawa Tamang, Kishore Thapa, Kishore Thapa, Dambar, Damber, Stenographer, Sadar P. S. Gangtok, Damber Chettri, Dawa Tamang, bush, Dawa Tamang, Damber Chettri, Arjun Tamang......................Sd/-, L.D.C., Law Dett

CARDINAL: 1, one, as many as 19, 2, one, two, 3, 2, 2, 10, 23, 14.00, 29, 23, 10, 10, 2, 23, 4, 2, 5, 6, 2, 8, 2, 9, 26, 27, 25, 26, 27, 10, 2, 2, 2, 2, 11, 12, 2, 2, 13

ORG: Sadar Police Station, IPC, First Information Report, IPC, P.W. 6, Government, Maruti Taxi, Sadar Police Station, Sadar Police Station, EXT, Kishor Thapa, Dawa Tamang, Lall Bazar, Sheree Punjab Hotel, EXT, A.G. Office, CFSL, Sections 25, Sections 25, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate

ORDINAL: first, second

PRODUCT: P.W. 5

DATE: 7-8 days, 16th September, 2003, 2003, 2003, 18th September, 2003, 2003, 17th September, 2003, 1872, 26, 1882, 10 of 1882

TIME: about 5.30 p.m., the morning of 17th September, the morning of 19th September, the night, 16-9-, about 10.30 p.m., the night, 16-9-2003, the fateful night

GPE: Nepali, P.I., Fort St. George

LANGUAGE: English

FAC: Upper Tathangchen

WORK_OF_ART: Magistrate

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //