Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Union of India and Others Vs. Kripesh Chandra Roy

Decided On : Aug-23-2012

Court : Guwahati

LAW: Rule 27, the CRPF Act, Section 11(1, the CRPF Act, Rule 27, Section 11, the CRPF Act, the CRPF Act, Article 226 of the Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, the Industrial Disputes Act, Rule 27, Rule 27, the Rule 27, Article 31(2, the Rule 27, Rule 27, Article 141 of the Constitution of India, section 11, the CRPF Act, Section 11, Section 11, Section 12, Section 12, Section 11, Section 3, Section 4, Section 9, Section 9(a, Section 9(1, Section 10, Section 9, Section 10, Section 18 of the Act, Rule 36, Section 9 or Section 10, Section 11, Section 11, Section 10, Section 11, Section 11(1, Rule 4, Rule 27, Section 11, Section 12, Section 12, Section 12, Section 12, Section 11, Section 9 or 10 of the Act, Section 11, Rule 27, Section 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution of India

PERSON: S. Talapatra, Raga, Pln, Pln, Radha Mohan Singh, Abdul Motin, Chetram Kulhar, S.G., P.K. Biswas, L.K. Verma v. H.M.T. Ltd., Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, Girdharilal Yadav, R. Datta, Singh Bedi v. Union, Charanjit G. Gill, R. Datta, Bhagar Ram v. State of Himachal Pradesh, Charanjit S. Gill, Singh Bedi, Court Martial, William ODouglas, L.K. Verma, Manohar Nakate, Biswas, Bakshish Singh, Biswas, Rule 27(c, so.” 14, Datta, A.K. Kraipak, Koshy George v. The, Kunj Behari Mishra, Para 19, “27, J.N. Sinha, Legislatures, Girija Shankar Pant, Baharul Islam, Rajyamalla Buzarbaruah v. Assam Administrative Tribunal, Rash Lal Yadav v. State, Shantikumar Singh, P. Thyagarajan, Mohan Arya, Ord, Shyam Singh v. Dy, Cls, Wednesbury, ¦Ordinarily

ORG: the Union of India, W.P., Constable, Inquiry, Court, Court, the Central Reserve Police Force, the Central Reserve Police Force Rules, CRPF Constable, the Force under Section 11(1, No.913253295 Constable Surendra Yadav, SI R.N., SI R.N., Commandant, Court, the Union of India-respondents, the CRPF Rules, Force, Constables, Inquiry, the Inquiry Officer, Court, the Union of India-respondents, Authority, Inquiry, the Appellate Authority, the Union of India-respondents, the CRPF Rules, Union of India, the Apex Court, Hombe Gowda Educational Trust, AIR 2006 SC, the Armed Forces, Civil Court, Constable, Force, the Apex Court, AIR, AIR 1982 SC 1413, Union of India, AIR 2000 SC 3425, the Armed Forces, Armed, Court, AIR 1983, SC, Sukh Das v. Union Territory of Arunachal Pradesh, AIR 1986, SC, the Armed Forces, Court, the Apex Court, Army, Army Act, Armed Forces, Court, Delhi Administration, AIR 1978 SC 1675, Parliament, the Armed Forces, Army Act, the Court Martial, Hombe Gowda Educational Trust, AIR 2006 SC, Hombe Gowda Educational Trust, Apex Court, the Bharat Forge Co. Ltd., Uttam Manohar Nakate, AIR 2005 SC 947, Bharat Forge Co. Ltd., the Labour Court, the Industrial Tribunal, The Industrial Courts, State of Punjab, AIR 1997, the Apex Court, the Civil Court, The High Court, SG, Guilty”, Commandant, Commandant, Commandant, Defence, Court, Union of India, AIR 1970 SC, Court, A.K. Kraipak, Court, Civil Appeal No.990, AIR 1969, SC, Tribunal, The Apex Court, Punjab National Bank and Ors, Punjab National Bank Officer Employees, Emphasis, AIR, Punjab National Bank, State Government, Houseless Harijan Employees Association, Karnataka and Ors, AIR 2001, SC, Houseless Harijan Employees Assn, Court, Union of India v. Col, AIR 1971, AIR Lab IC, Legislature, Kumaon Mandal Vikas Nigam Ltd., AIR 2001, SC, the Apex Court, The Apex Court, Kumaon Mandal Vikas Nigam Ltd., Nigam, CT, Union of India and Ors, Court, Ors, NOC, The Apex Court, AIR SCW, Courts, Court, Union of India, AIR 1999, SC, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Maibam, the Assam Police Manual Part-III, the Honble Apex Court, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., AIR 2006 SC, the Honble Apex Court, Force, Deen Dayal, the Central Reserve Police Force Act, the Central Government, the Central Reserve Police Force, the Central Government, the Force a Commandant, Minor Punishments - (, Force, Force, Court, Commandant, Court, Commandant, Commandant, the Central Government, the Central Government, Force, the Central Government, Jamadar (Sub-Inspector, Force, Force, Force, Rajasthan High Court, Central Reserve, AIR, Sec, Force, Emphasis, AIR 2005, SC, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Maibam Ibohal Singh, Appellate, Court, the Union of India-appellants, Bhagat Ram v. State of Himachal Pradesh, AIR 1983 SC, the Apex Court

CARDINAL: 05-12-2006, 22-3-99, 19-4-99, 17-10-99, 22-3-99, 19-4-99, 17-10-99, 2, 27.02.1999, 22.03.1999, 19-04-1999, one, 3., 4., two, 22.03.1999, 3, 3, 3, 303, 304, 5, 17.10.1999, 6., 27(c, 1, 460, 975, 964, 6, 381, 6, 8., two, 3, 140, 5, 742, 9, 454, 10, 11, 975, 964, 2, 489, four, 12, 13, 1, at least 48, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 3, 243, two, 1, 2, one, 15, 7, 84, 7(2, 7(2, 1, 610, 28, 8, 17, 1, 182, Sixty-five, 18, 2, 1, 1, 71, 5, 267, only two, 19, 20, 1, 449, 169, 21, 6, 507, 7.4.2003, 7.4.2003, 713, 7.4.2003, 22, 23, 10, 11, 1, more than twenty-eight days, 12, 2, three, one, two, 11, 12, 1, 11, 9, 25, 26, 22.03.1999, 17.10.1999, 27.02.1999, 2, 442, 454, 27

DATE: 2000, 1955, 1949, 07.10.1998, 91325395, 1949, 1955, 19.04.1999, 1949, Rule 27(c, 1955, 19.04.1999, 1955, 2006, 2006, 1997, 2004, 1982, 2000, 1983, 1947, 1955, “Guilty”, 2005, 1955, recent years, years, 1968, 1998, 1998, 1998, 1977, Para 19, 2001, 28, 1971, 2001, Para 22, 2000, 2001, 1983, 1983, 1839, 1994, 1994, 3329, 1955, 1999, 1999, 2009, 2006 4, 1949, 1974, 1949, less than seven years, fourteen years, three months, one year, three months, 1955, one months, one month, Raj 140, 24, 2005, 3417, 19.04.1999, F.VIII.7/99-45, 1983, 1983

GPE: Butt, P.C., India, Karnataka, Apex, India, Sunil Batra, India, Uttam, Mutum, Shantikumar, Singh v. Union of India, Chelfremog, India, Mutum, Singh v. State, Manipur, Clauses, V. Ramana v. A.P.S.R.T.C.

WORK_OF_ART: Constable Surendra Yadav, Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, Lab IC 8) this Court, Lab IC 929

PRODUCT: Memorandum, Report, Rule 2, “in, 7 SCC 338, Memorandum

LOC: Single, Single, State Govt

EVENT: SC 2696, SC 2696

ORDINAL: third, third, first

QUANTITY: “â€

NORP: Rules, Rules, Rules

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //