Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Bacchu Miah Vs. State of Tripura

Decided On : Mar-13-2013

Court : Guwahati

LAW: the Rule 15(2

CARDINAL: 1, 2., 11, 19-11-2007, 3., 11-05-1993, 4., 02-12-1995, more than 6, 04-12-2007, 5, 15(2, 2, 2-A, 3, 6., five, 8., 9, 10, 15(2A, 11, 2A, 12, 02-12-1995, No.3, 3, 13

PERSON: A.K. Bhowmik, A. Ghosh, W.P.(C, A. Ghosh, A.K. Bhowmik, Bhowmik, A.K. Bhowmik, A. Ghosh, A. Ghosh, A. Ghosh

ORG: State, the Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Court, Court, State Counsel, State, Tripura Civil Service, CCA, Disciplinary Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, the Inquiring Authority, the Inquiring Authority, Inquiring Authority, Government, the Disciplinary Authority, Government, Government, the Apex Court, Government, AIR 1994, the Supreme Court, Government, State, CCA, CCA, State, CCA, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Government of Tripura, State

GPE: Govt, Tripura, CCS, CCS

DATE: 19-09-1994, 2002, 18-10-1999, 11-05-1993, six) years, 26-05-2008, 16-06-2008, about two years, 1965, fifteen days, para-17, 16-06-2008, a few days, Rule 15(2, 1965, Rules 15(2, 1965, 1965, 05-01-2002, 16-06-2008, a period of, 15 days, today, another 15 days, three) months, today, two months, 14

EVENT: SC 1074

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //