Dr. JaIn Video on Wheels Limited, New Delhi Vs. Union of India, Represented by Secretary and Others

Decided On : May-10-2013

Court : Guwahati

LAW: Article 226 of the constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution of India

ORG: the Inter Facility Medical Ambulance Services, Respondents, Respondents, Inter Facility Medical Ambulance, the Letter of Intent, the Inter Facility Medical Ambulance Services, Inter Facility Medical Ambulance Services, the department of Health and Family Welfare, Single Entity / Consortium of Organizations / Institutions, Call Centre, Geographical Information System, GPRS, the State Government, the Lead Partner, the Tender Document Amended, –, Single Entity / Consortium of Organizations / Institutions, Call Centre, the Call Centre, GPF/GPRS, Geographical Information System, GPRS, the State Government, the Lead Partner, Geographical information System, GPRS, the Lead Partner, the Oxygen Delivery System, BIS, US FDA, CE, ASSE/ANSI 2006, the Oxygen Delivery System, BIS, US FDA, CE, ASSE/ANSI 2006, Cylinder, Clause 2.1, the Nodal Officer of Respondent No.2, the MD of Respondent No.2, the MD of Respondent No.2, inter alia, MMU, Mobile Medical Units, EMD, Bank Guarantee, Govt, ref 1.2, the Law of Natural Justice, CVC Procurement Guidelines, Supreme Court Directives, RFP, Emergency Ambulance Services, EMD, BC/DD, Bank Guarantee, “We, the Jain Medical Centre with Emergency, Preventive, Curative,, Mobile Medical Units, Advanced Life Support Units, the Basic Non Emergency Ambulances, Chattisgarh, EMD, Govt, DOT, ref, MMU, ref, Inter Facility Ambulance Services, EMD /Security Deposit, the Law of Natural Justice, CVC, Supreme Court, RFP, the Bid Evaluation Committee, the Bid Evaluation Committee, Ambulance Services, Control Room and, Financial, the Bid Evaluation Committee, Technical Proposal, Mobile Medial Unit, MMU, MMU, Ambulance Service, MMU, the Ambulance Service, MMU, Ambulance Service, MMU, Ambulance Service, MMU, MMU, Ambulance Service, the Bid Evaluation Committee, the Bid Evaluation Committee, MMU, MMU, the Bid Evaluation Committee, Ambulance Service, Control Room and, the State Programme Officer, State Health, Ambulance, SDHS, Ambulance Services, MMU, MMU, Ambulance Service, Committee, MMU, Ambulance Services, MMU, MMU, MMU, Ambulance, the Bid Evaluation Committee, MMU, Ambulance Service, MMU, the Patna High Court, CWJ Case No, Ambulance Service, the Patna High Court, AAG, the Committee., MMU, the Ambulance Service, MMU, MMU, MMU, Inter Facility Medical Ambulance Services, Ambulance Service, MMU, MMU, MMU, the Bid Evaluation Committee, Inter Facility Ambulance Services, Call Centre, the Tender Evaluation Committee, MMU, Ambulance Service, MMU, MMU, MMU, Ambulance Service, MMU, Ambulance Services, MMU, MMU, MMU, MMU, Medical Unit, MMU, National Rural Health Mission, Assam, Mobile Medical Unit, MMU, MMU, MMU, Curative Care, Reproductive and Child Health Services, Family Planning Services, Specialized, Services, IEC, RTI/STI, Mobile Medical Unit, MMU, Mobile Medical Unit, MMU, Court, Ambulance Service, Court, Directorate of Education Vs, Govt, Court, Courts, the Apex Court, Tata Cellular Vs., Union of India, Monarch Infrastructure, Ullasnagar Municipal Corporation, Government, Educomp Datamatics, Air India Ltd. Vs, the Apex Court, State, State, State, Siemens Public Communication Networks Pvt, Union of India, Court, Inter Facility Medical Ambulance Services, Control Room and, Telephony Integration, GPRS, Inter Facility Transportation Service, TERMS, REFERENCE 2.1 Target Group/Coverage Government of Assam, Inter Facility Ambulance Services, Millennium Development Goals, Infant Mortality Rate, Inter facility Transportation, Geographical Information System, Global Positioning System, BLS, PHC, Objectives, Inter Facility Medical Ambulance Services, Agency, the Control Room with Geographical Information System, Global Positioning System, the Response Centre, the Standard Operating Procedures for Ambulances, Standing Operating Procedures, SOP, Response Centre, the Effective Date, Department, the Standard Operating Procedures, Scope, Operation Systems, –, Departments, Departments, SOP, Department, SOP, Department, RFP, Monitoring and Evaluation, the Bid Evaluation Committee, the Bid Evaluating Committee, Inter Facility Medical Ambulance Service, MMU, the Ambulance Services, MMU, Ambulance Services, MMU, MMU, MMU, Primary Healthcare Services, MMU, Ambulance Service, Ambulance, MMU, MMU, Ambulance Services, Inter Facility Medical Ambulance Services, MMU, Court, the Judgement of the Patna High Court, AC 495, St. John Ambulance Association, the Patna High Court, the Inter Facility Medical Ambulance Service, Control Room and, GPRS Integrated Ambulance Monitoring System, the Bid Evaluation Committee, RFP, Inter Facility Transfer Services, the State of Andhra Pradesh, the Bid Evaluation Committee, RFP, Court, MMU, Inter Facility Ambulance Services, MMU, MMU, Inter Facility Medical Ambulance Service

GPE: Assam, Assam, Assam, Assam, Govt, India, Integration, India, India, India, DD, Govt, India, DD, Govt., Assam, Assam, States, the State of Bihar, States, Ambulance, Bihar, AAG, Assam, Ambulance Service, Ambulance, States, India, Centre, Assam, Quinn V. Leathem, States, States, Assam

CARDINAL: 76, 6, 2, No.2, 9, 5, 9, 336, 17, 336, two, 268, 274, 16, 268, 18, 274, 6, 3, two, 22.2.2013, 4., 100, 4, four, 5, two, 1 1.2, 1.2, 100, 1.2, 100, at least 100, 4, four, 4, four, 2 3, 75, 25, 3, 200, 5.25, 4, 200, 1.07 5, 200, two, 6, 200, 35, 1, 5, 2.00, 6, 7, 8, 17.11.2012, 8, 25.11.2012, 9, 27.11.2012, 10, 10.12.2012, one, 50, 2., 250, 100, 3, 50.00, 4, 2.13, 2, 100, 50, 3., 20, 10, 4., 2.13, 50.00, 25.00, 1, 102, 2., 50, 100, 3., 250, 4., 50.00, 5, 2, 250, 250, 1.2 and 2.13, 21, 27, 8, 28.12.2012, 11.2.2013, No.2, 100, 9, 10, 11.2.2013, 11, 18, 18, 12, 16.2.2013, 11.2.2013, 2, 28.12.2012, 13, 15.3.2013, No.2, 7.3.2013, 14, 1, 2, 3, 4, 15, No.2, three, 11.2.2013, 7.3.2013, 1.4.2013, 28.12.2012, 3, 100, 16, 7.3.2013, two, 504, 4.1.2013, No.2, 17, two, No.5, 6, 16.1.2013, No.5, 6, 96.2, two, 18, 1.4.2013, No.2, 19, 5.3.2012, 8, 20, 6, 15.3.2013, 21, 22, 23, one, 17.11.2012, 24, 100, 26, 15.3.2013, 27, 28, 7.3.2003, three, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 27, 23, 30, 4, 31, 6, 651, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 32, 5, 12, 33, 2, one, 34, 16, 10, two, 40, 35, 100, 1.13, 2.1, 102, 450, 102, 102, One, 24, 7, 200, 250, 250, 102, 2.2, 24x7, three, 37, “ 2.15.2, three, 2.15.3, 38, 39, 40., 41, 43, One, 100, 6, 7.3.2013, 2, 6, 1.4.2013, 12, 108, 284, 802, 45.

DATE: 10 to 76, 3 years, annual, the last 3 financial years, 3 years, 2 years, three years, 3 years, annual, the last 3 financial years, annual, the last 3 financial years, 1789, 1789, 18.12.2012, 13.10.2012, 15.10.2012, 28.10.2012, No.2, 13.10.2012,, 16.10.2012, 17.11.2012, 27.12.2012, 6 months, 3 years, 03 years, 06 months, last three financial years, the last three decades, 6 months, 6 months, two years, two years, two years, about 10 months, more than 2 years, 21.12.2012, No.6., 22753/2012, six months, 28.12.2012, 2 years, 15.3.2013., 2006, November 11, 2007)” 29, 2004, 1994, 2000, 2000, 2008, 2006, 77, the last date, 36, a period of, fifteen days, 42, 1901, at-least one year, two years, 44, 1516, 15th August, 2005, 3903, 46

PERSON: Certiorari, Certiorari, Reference Content, Cr, MoU, Floor Area, Oxygen Cylinder, Lakhs, Proposal, Nos, Bihar, C. P. Sharma, C. P. Sharma, D. Saikia, P.K. Goswami, Saikia, P.K. Goswami, Sharma, Wednesbury, Structures, Protocols, Halsburry

PRODUCT: Respondent No.2, Respondent No.2, Respondent No.2, Respondent No.2, Respondent No.2, Respondent No.2, Respondent No.2

ORDINAL: first, First, second, Firstly, first, first, first, tertiary, first, first, firstly, secondly, thirdly

PERCENT: more than 20%, 1800 – 2000, 100%

WORK_OF_ART: Single Entity /Consortium of Organizations / Institutions

QUANTITY: 5.75-6.5 Square Meter, 5000 to 6000 Liters

EVENT: AS/NZS 4535, AS/NZS 4535

TIME: 2.00 PM, as per the minutes, the particular Act, / golden hour, 20 minutes, 25 minutes, 35 minutes, 90 seconds, 24 hours

NORP: Anx.-I, Diagnostic, Diagnostic, telephonic

LOC: Govt, Govt, Govt, Financial Proposal, Financial Proposal, Ambulance, Govt

MONEY: 70.81 marks

FAC: Cochin International Airport, Reliance Airport, Departmental