Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Tata Steel Limited Through Its Chief Legal and Compliance Mrs Meena Lall Vs. Union of India Through the Secretary Ministry of Coal and Ors

Decided On : Jan-10-2018

Court : Jharkhand

LAW: Section 9, Section 13, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Rule 64-B of the Mineral Concession Rules, Section 9, Rule 64-C of the Mineral Concession Rules, Section 9, the Companies Act, Section 9, the "MMDR Act, Section 9, Section 9, Act 56 of 1972, Section 9, Section 9(2, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Rule 64-B(1, Section 9, Section 9, Rule 64-B and Rule 64-C, Rule 64-C of the Mineral Concession Rules, Rule 64-B and Rule 64-C of the Mineral Concession Rules, Rule 64-B and Rule 64-C of the MCR, Rule 64-B and Rule 64-C, Rule 64-B, Section 9, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Section 9, Rule 64-B of the Mineral Concession Rules, Section 9 of MMDR Act, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Section 9 of MMDR Act, Rule 64-B and Rule 64-C of the Mineral Concession Rules, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Section 9, Rule 64-B and Rule 64-C of the MCR, Rule 64-B of the MCR, Rule 64-B and Rule 64-C of the MCR, Rule 64-B and Rule 64-C of the MCR, Article 14, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 14, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Section 9, Section 3(d, the MMDR Act, Article 14 of the Constitution, Act i.e. Section 9 of M.M.D.R. Act, Article 14, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 14, section 64C, section 9, Section 9, the MMDR Act, the MMDR Act, Section 9, the MMDR Act, Section 9, Section 9, Rule 64-B and Rule 64-C of the MCR, Rule 64-B of the MCR, Rule 64-B and Rule 64-C of the MCR, Rule 64-B and Rule 64-C of the MCR, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 3 of the Act, Section 3(i, the Mines Act, Section 2(1)(j, the Mines Act, Section 3(d, the Mines Act, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 14, Article 14, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Rule 64-B and Rule 64-C of the Mineral Concession Rules, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Section 9, the Mines Act, the MMDR Act, Section 9, Rule 64-B and Rule 64-C of the Mineral Concession Rules, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Section 9

CARDINAL: 1, 2184, 1, 2185, 1, 2, 14.12.2017, 64, 64, 64, 64, 64, 64, 64, 64, 64, 1960.3, two, 64, 9, 1, 2, 2-A, 3, 4, 64, 64, 1, 2, 159, 807, 6, 6, 6, 5, 1/3rd, 1, 1984(R, 6, 64, 25.09.2000, 64, 64, 6 8, 64, 4, 64, 303, 304, 6, 77.1, 77.2, 77.3, 25.9.2000, 77.4, 10.8.1998 to, 25.9.2000, 25.9.2000, 7, 77.5, 25.9.2000, 77.6, 72, 72, 1, 303, 5-6, 9-10, two, 17.03.2015, 64, 64C, 64, 12, 64, more than 110, about 112, 9, 2, two, 1 SCC500, 10, two, 10, 64, 6, 72, 64, 64C, 64, 11, 64, 6, 1, 2, 64, 64, 12, 25.9.2000, 16, 64, 6, 64, 4, 1, 13, 66, 64, 64, 19, 6, 64, 64, 64, 64, 1, 64, 64, 64, 64, 4, 64, 64C, 16, one, 64C, 64C, 64C, 111, 64B, 64C, as many as thirteen, two, 1, 17, 2, 114, 116, 64C, 6, two, 18, 60, 63, 19, 66, 25.9.2000.68, 1, 2, 64, 64, 20, 25.9.2000, 6, 64, 25.9.2000, 64, 64, 3, 2(5, 9, 22, 64, 64, 64, 1, 66, 23, 64, 24, 64, 1960.31, three

ORG: W.P., W.P., W.P., W.P., Tata Steel Limited, Union of India, Ministry of Coal, Ministry of Mines, Government of India, The State of Jharkhand, Ranchi.4, Department of Mines & Geology, Government of Jharkhand, District Mining Officer, Tata Steel Limited, Union of India, Ministry of Coal, Ministry of Mines, Government of India, The State of Jharkhand, Ranchi.4, Department of Mines & Geology, Government of Jharkhand, District Mining Officer, Dhanbad, JUSTICE, Punit D. Tyagi, A.G. Chanchal Jain, A.G. Master Akash, A.G. For the Union of India : M/s. Rajiv Sinha, C.G.S., Niraj Kumar, Heard, Tata Steel Limited, Advocate General, the State of Jharkhand, the Union of India.2, Tata Steel Limited, the Mineral Concession Rules, the Mineral Concession Rules, the Mineral Concession Rules, the Mineral Concession Rules, the Mineral Concession Rules, the Central Government, Ministry of Mines, Tata Steel Limited, the District Mining Officer, Hazaribag / Ramgarh / Dhanbad, the Mineral Concession Rules, Tata Steel, the Districts of Ramgarh, the Tata Steel, the Tata Steel, Washery Grade-IV Coal, Steel Grade, Tata Steal Limited, ROM, State, the Mineral Concession Rules, leases.-, the Mineral Concession Rules, The Journey So Far 4, the National Coal Development Corporation Limited, NCDC, the Government of India, the Orissa Public Demands, NCDC, the Orissa High Court, Orissa High Court, National Coal Development Corporation Ltd., Supreme Court of India, NCDC, State, Steel Authority of India Ltd., Central Coalfields Ltd. Vs, State of, Jharkhand & Ors, NCDC, Tata Steel, ROM, Patna High Court, Judgment, the Patna High Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, State, Vs., Steel Authority of India Limited, ROM, Supreme Court, the Mineral Concession Rules, Tata Steel Limited, ROM, the Mineral Concession Rules, the District Mining Officer, Ramgarh / Hazaribag / Dhanbad, Tata Steel Limited, the Mineral Concession Rules, Court, Court, the Mineral Concession Rules, Tata Steel, the Mineral Concession Rules, Tata Steel, Tata Steel, Court, Tata Steel, Supreme Court of India, Civil Appeals, Supreme Court, Court, Central Coalfields Ltd., the Orissa High Court, National Coal Development Corpn., Court, the Mineral Concession Rules, Central Coalfields Ltd., Tata Steel, Tata Steel, the Mineral Concession Rules, Tata Steel, the Supreme Court, Tata Steel, MCR, Tata Steel, the Tata Steel, I.A. No, the High Court, the Mineral Concession Rules, Supreme Court, the High Court, Rule 64B, the Mineral Concession Rules, Supreme Court of, Tata Steel, the Mineral Concession Rules, the Mineral Concession Rules, Learned Senior Counsel, ROM, Tata Steel, Washery Grade-IV Coal, ROM, Sr. Counsel, Steel Grade-I, Steel Grade-II, Steel Grade-I, Learned Sr. Counsel, Washery Grade-IV, Washery Grade-IV, the Washery Grade-IV, Steel Grade-I, the Steel Grade-I, Learned Sr. Counsel, ROM, Learned Sr. Counsel, Learned Sr. Counsel, Sub-Rule, the Mineral Concession Rules, Learned Sr. Counsel, Jharia Group of Collieries, Tata Steel, Bhelatand A, Bhelatand A, ROM, Tata Steel, ROM, Bhelatand A, Bhelatand A, ROM, the Supreme Court of India, Nagpur Improvement Trust & Another Vs, Vithal Rao & Ors, State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors, Deepak Fertilizers & Petrochemical Corporation Ltd., the Apex Court, State, the Mineral Concession Rules, Court, Learned Sr. Counsel, Supreme Court of, the Tata Steel, the Apex Court, the Tata Steel, the Supreme Court, the Tata Steel, the High Court, the Mineral Concession Rules, Supreme Court, Tata Steel, the High Court, Rule 64B, the Mineral Concession Rules, Learned Sr. Counsel, Court, Learned Sr. Counsel, State, the Union of India, Learned Advocate General, the State of Jharkhand, Tata Steel, Court, the Mineral Concession Rules, Court, the Mineral Concession Rules, Court, the Supreme Court of India, the High Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, ROM, ROM, ROM, MCR, MCR, Tata Steel, Convenience Volume, MCR, the Union of India.70, the Union of India, the Union of India, the Union of India to Rule 64-B and Rule 64-C, MCR, NMDC this Court, the Union of India, MCR, Central Coalfield Ltd., Learned Advocate General, the Mineral Concession Rules, the Apex Court, Court, Court, Court, Supreme Court, Learned Advocate General, the State of Jharkhand, the Mineral Concession Rules, the Apex Court, Central Excise & Another, Court, Court, Emphasis, Advocate General, the Apex Court, Union of India & Others Vs, Nitdip Textile Processors Private Limited & Another, Court, Court, State, Court, Emphasis, Advocate General, the Mineral Concession Rules, MMDR, Second Schedule, the Union of India, Advocate General, the Supreme Court, the Mineral Concession Rules, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Tata Steel, Court, Supreme Court of, Apex Court, Court, the Mineral Concession Rules, the Mineral Concession Rules, Apex Court, The Apex Court, the Mineral Concession Rules, the Supreme Court, Tata Steel, Interlocutory Applications, the High Court, the Mineral Concession Rules, Supreme Court, Board, Supreme Court, Tata Steel, Court, the High Court, Court, Court, the Mineral Concession Rules, Court, Court, the State of Jharkhand, the Union of India, the Mineral Concession Rules, the High Court, Apex Court, the High Court, the Mineral Concession Rules, Court, ROM, Court, Court, the Apex Court, State of Bihar & Ors, Supreme Court, the Mineral Concession Rules, Court, the Mineral Concession Rules, Holder, the State Government, the State Government, the Mineral Concession Rules, State, the Colliery Control Orders, State, Supreme Court, Apex Court, Supreme Court, ROM, ROM, State, Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Washery Grade IV, Steel, Apex Court, ROM, Court, Court, Central Coalfields Ltd., ROM, ROM, ROM, MCR, MCR, Tata Steel, Convenience Volume, MCR, the Union of India.70, the Union of India, the Union of India, the Union of India to Rule 64-B and Rule 64-C, MCR, NMDC this Court, the Union of India, MCR, Central Coalfield Ltd., Supreme Court, Washery Grade-IV to Steel, ROM, the Supreme Court, Para-66, Supreme Court, the Apex Court, State of Bihar & Ors, Tata Steel Limited, The State Government, State, the State Government’s, MMDR Act, the State Government, the Central 21 Government, Apex Court, Supreme Court, the Central Government, Emphasis, U.P. & Ors, Emphasis, V.P. Pithupitchai & Anr, T.N., the Mineral Concession Rules, the Mineral Concession Rules, the Apex Court, Union of India & Others Vs, Nitdip Textile Processors Private Limited & Another, Court, State, Court, Emphasis, the Mineral Concession Rules, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the District Mining Officers, Ramgarh / Hazaribag / Dhanbad, the Mineral Concession Rules

DATE: 2015, 2015, 2015, 2015, 10.01.2018, 1960, 1960, 1957, 1960, 1957, 1960, 1960, 1957, 1960, 1957, 1960, 1957, 1960, 1960, the year 1970, 1976, 1998, 1998, 2015, 12.9.1972, the year 1998, 1998, 1960, about the year 2007, 1505, 2009, 2014, 2938-39, 2940-41, 2015, 2004, 2015, 2004, 2940-2941, 2938-2939, 2015, 1960, 8th May, 2015, 1960, 1973, 2007, 2015, 2009, 1505, 2009, 2015, 2015, 1974, 2012, the day, 14 18, 2015, 8th May, 2015, 2015, 15 20, 26.6.2015, 22.3.2017, 1990, 1960, 1960, 64C, 1978, 1979, 2015, 2015, 1990, 4, 1952, 1952, 1952, 1976, 1957, 1963, 2003, 2012, the day, royalty.30, the 10th of January, 2018

GPE: New Delhi.2, New Delhi.2, J.C., J.C., J.C., India, the State of Jharkhand, Dhanbad, the District of Dhanbad, Jharia, Orissa, Orissa, C.W.J.C., Orissa, India, SAIL, I.As, India, Sijua, Sijua, Sijua, Sr., India, India, India, India, India, India, rejects.84, NMDC, NMDC, NMDC, SAIL, raiyati, Ranchi, D.S./N.A.F.R.

PERSON: Ranchi.5, Mining Officer, Ranchi.5, Mining Officer, H.C. MISHRA HON’BLE MR, S.N. PATHAK, Avirat Kumar, Kumar Sundaram, H.C. Mishra, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Ajit Kumar, Rajiv Sinha, Jamshedpur, Jamshedpur, Rules 64-B, SAIL, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, Jhar 513, Jamshedpur, Second Schedule, Second Schedule, I.A. Nos, I.A. Nos, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Washery Grade-IV, Washery Grade-III, Washery Grade-II, Washery Grade-I, Steel Grade-I, Washery Grade-IV, Washery Grade-III, Washery Grade-II, Washery Grade-I, Sijua, Washery Grade-IV, Anwar Ali Sarkar, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, Second Schedule, SAIL, Rules 64-B, Bench, Coking Coal Limited, Rules 64B, Levy, Rules 64B, Rules 64B(1, Rules 64B, Rules 64B, Anwar Ali Sarkar, Ram Krishna Dalmia, S.R. Tendolkar, Rule 64B, SAIL, SAIL, SAIL, Coking Coal Limited, Anwar Ali Sarkar's, Coking Coal Limited's, Bhagwan Dass's, V.P. Pithupitchai's, H.C. Mishra, P. Patnaik, S.N. Pathak, S.N. Pathak

LOC: the District 3, Govt

FAC: the Washery Grade-IV Coal, Washery Grade-III Coal, the Writ Applications, Steel Grade-II, Second Schedule, Second Schedule

PRODUCT: Steel Grade-1 Coal, Rule 64-C of the Mineral Concession Rules, Rule 64-B and Rule 64- C, Judgment, the Larger Bench

PERCENT: 64-C. Royalty, more than 30%, up to 26 %, up to 22 %, up to 20%, up to 17%, 14%

NORP: Rules, Rules, Rules, Bhelatand A, Rules, I.As, Rules, Rules, Rules, Rules, Rules, Rules, Rules, Rules, Rules, Rules, Rules, repetition:-"7

ORDINAL: first, second, first, Second, first, first

QUANTITY: 100 tons, 100 tonnes, 105 tonnes

WORK_OF_ART: the Larger Bench, SCC557, the Second Schedule, the Second Schedule, the Second Schedule, Bhagwan Dass Vs

EVENT: the Second Schedule, the Second Schedule

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //