G.K. Mathur Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax Meerut

Decided On : Aug-24-2012

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Section 17, the Income Tax Act, Section 17, Income Tax Act, Section 17, the Income tax Act, Section 143, Section 148, Section 148, Section 234B, Section 271, ITR 91, Section 17, section 17, section 17, section 17, section 17, section 10, section 17, Section 2, Section 17, Section 17, Section 17, Section 17, Rule 17, Rule 2, Section 17, the Income Tax Act, Section 17, Section 4, Section 17, Section 2, Section 2, Section 192, Section 80, Section 2, Section 2, Constitution, Section 17, Section 2, Section 21, Section 2, Section 17, Section 17A, Section 15, the Income Tax Act, Section 22D, Chapter IV, Section (gg, Section 22D, Section 17

CARDINAL: 1, 3, 2, Rs.53,640/-, 3, 3, 1, 14.12.1999, 17.2.2000, 4.5.2000, 6.9.2000, Rs.53,640/-, 3, Rs.53,640/-, 234C, 1, 53, 1, 4, 3, 1, 3, 3, 3, 24, 3, 3, 3, 1, 2, 1, 5, 2, 3, 6., 3, 1, 3, two, 24, 24, 283, 7, 2, 272, 2, 202, 3, 283, 48, 222, 106, 758, 1, 8, 24, 1, 1, 2, 9, 3, 12, 13, 10, 8.12.1961, 11, 3, 12

ORG: Allahabad, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SMC-VI, Shri Pramod, High Court, Rs.1,72,800/-, AO, CIT, CIT, L.W. Russel, THE Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Conditions of Service) Rules, the All India Services, R.16, the Central Government, the Central Civil Services, Tribunal, Conditions of Service) Rules, High Court, the Department of Justice, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India, High Court, Supreme Court, the Department of Pension and Pensioner's Welfare (Ministry of Personnel, Pension Government of India, Condition of Service) Rules, v. Union of India, AIR 1988 Alld, CIT, Bangalore v. Infosys Technologies Ltd., CIT, Willamson Financial Services, CIT, Pune, v. Union of India, AIR 1988 Alld, CIT, CIT, SC, Bombay Mehboob Productions Pvt. Ltd., CIT, CIT Bangalore v. Infosys Technologies Ltd., the Supreme Court, TDS, TDS, CIT, Willamson Financial Services, the Supreme Court, Court, the Central Government, The High Court, Art.221, the Central Government, the U.P. State Government, the Indian Administrative Service, Shri P.K. Jain, the High Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service, Tribunal

PERSON: Delhi Bench, Shri Amitabh Agrawal, Shri R.K. Upadhyaya, Rs.1,72,800/-, P.K. Jain, Salary, P.K. Jain, P.K. Jain, Salary, P.K. Jain, Shrimant Padmaraje, R. Kadambande, M.C. Desai, P. H. Divecha v., L.W. Russell, Brandy Syndicate v. IRC, M.C. Desai v. Union of India

GPE: New Delhi, A.O., A.O., M.C., Bombay City, India

DATE: the assessment year 1998-99, 10th June, 2004, 1961, the assessment year 1998-99, 30.10.1998, the assessment year 1988-99, the year, 1964, 24, 1956, 1958, 1958, 1956, Rule 17, 1958, 1956, 15, 16, 17, 2008, 2008, 1992, 21, 1977, 1921, 5 years, 12 months, years, Rule 8, 24, Rule 8, 1961, 1954, 1954, 1961, 1998, 1954

PRODUCT: Rule 2

WORK_OF_ART: "Retiring Pension

EVENT: Clause 10, Clause 10A, Clause 13A of Section 10