Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Saiyad Mustaq Ali and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Another

Decided On : Nov-27-2012

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Section 204 Criminal Procedure Code, Section 190, Section 200 of the Code, Section 202 of the Code, Section 204 of the Code, Section 203, Section 204 of the Code, Chapter XV, Section 200 of the Code, Section 200 of the Code, Section 202 of the Code, Section 200, Section 420 I.P.C., Dowry Prohibition Act, Section 200 of the Code, Section 200 of the Code, Section 202 of the Code, Section 203 of the Code, Section 204 of the Code, Section 204 of the Code, Section 200, Section 203/204 of the Code, Section 200, Section 200, Section 204 of the Code, Section 204, Section 203, Section 202, Section 204, Section 203, Section 203, Section 200 of the Code, Section 200 of the Code

PERSON: Singh Yadav, J. In, Judicial Magistrate, Mahoba, Mahoba, Kamar Ali, Tillu, Mahoba Branch No.0519393110, Judicial Magistrate, Family Visa, facie, Judicial Magistrate, Mahoba, XV, priam facie, Vadilal Panchal, Duttatraya Dulaji Ghadigaonkar, Chandra Deo Singh, Chandra Bose, Nirmaljit Singh Hoon v. State, Kewal Krishan v., Suraj Bhan, Mohinder Singh, Gulwant Singh, L.J. Page 2370, Mahoba

ORG: Criminal Revision, the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, State Bank of India, Rs.1,60,000/-, C.J.M., C.J.M., C.J.M., Court, A.G.A., C.J.M., C.J.M., C.J.M., C.J.M., M/s, Pepsi Foods Ltd., Supreme Court, Hon'ble Supreme Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, A.G.A, Magistrate, Court, C.J.M., C.J.M., C.J.M., Revisionist, Magistrates, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, A.G.A., Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Nagrendra Tiwary and Others, AIR 2010, the Apex Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Court, R.C. Ruia v. State, AIR 1958, SC, AIR 1963, Supp SCC, AIR 1980 SC, AIR 1992, Vediocon International Ltd., AIR 208 SC, AIR SCW, U.P., Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Court, C.J.M.

DATE: 19.12.2005, 1973, No.0512679507 of, 1998, 1958, 1961, 1964, 1430, 1973, 1972, 1980, 1780, 1992, 1992, 2008, 1203, 2012

CARDINAL: 2, 1., 2, 1, One, 5, 2, 15,000/-, 636081, 1, 4, 22.3.2005, 1, 2, two, 13.10.2005, 14.10.2005, 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 31.10.2005, 2, 2, 2, 2., 2, 1, 3, 4., 5, 1, 2, 6., 128, only two, 7, 8., 2, two, 1, 4, two, 9, 2, 1, 1, 202, 2, 12, 10, 11, 12, 2, 202, 202, 202, 13, 204, 209, 618, 97, 1, 1, 1, 639, 3, 499, 2, 213, 2189, 2, 492, 2008, 14, 15, 204, 16, 17

NORP: Revisionists, Cheque, Revisionists, Revisionists

PRODUCT: Rs.60,000/-

LOC: the Respondent No.2, Umrao Vs

GPE: Saudi Arabia, Shievjee, Cr, P.C., Bombay

LANGUAGE: Chapters

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //