Sree Rayalaseema Alkalies and Allied Chemicals Ltd., and Another Vs. Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission and Others

Decided On : Oct-18-2012

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

LAW: Article 11.5 of the PPA, the Income Tax Act, this Section 11.5, Item 10, the Clause 11.5 of the PPA, Article 9.5 of the PPA, Article 11.5 of the PPA

PERSON: M. Karpaga Vinayagam, 17.5.2012, Appellant, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦â€¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦â€¦, Structure, Structure, Structure, Structure, Structure, MESCOM, ‘increase, 25.8.2010, Review Order, Appellant

ORG: Allied Chemicals Ltd, Appeal, Royalaseema Alkalies, Allied Chemicals Ltd., the Karnataka Electricity Board, Karnataka Electricity Board, the Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited, the Karnataka Power Transmission Company Limited, State Power Procurement Co-ordination, The Coordination Centre, Appellant, the Power Company of Karnataka Limited, the 3rd Respondent, the Power Procurement Company, Mangalore Electricity Supply Company, the State Commission, The State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Review Petition, Appellant, Appeal, Appellant, Counsel for the Respondent, Appeal, Review Petition, Counsel for the Respondent, Counsel for the Respondent, Counsel for the Respondent, Counsel for the Respondent, Appeal, the State Commission, Clause 11.5, Project operation on, Board, Supplementary Bills, Indian Corporate Tax Rate, the Government of Karnataka, Page 14, the KEB”. Further, M/s. Sree Rayalaseema Alkalies, Allied Chemicals Limited, KEB, KEB, Allied Chemicals Limited, Clause 11.5, BESCOM, Board, Clause 11.5, The State Commission, Purchasers, the Review Petition, the Review Order, Appeal, Counsel for the Respondent, Appeal, Tribunal, Counsel for the Respondent, Counsel for the Respondent, the Karnataka Electricity Board, the Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited, Appellant, WP, the High Court, an Escrow Account, High Court, the Transmission Company, the Escrow Account, the Transmission Company, Appeal, the High Court, the Escrow Account, Appellant, the High Court, the State Commission, The State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Review Petition, the High Court, the Transmission Company, the State Commission, the State Commission, Appellant, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Review Petition No.2, The High Court, the State Commission, Counsel for the Respondent, Appellant, Counsel for the Respondent, Counsel for the Respondent, Appellant, the High Court, the State Commission, the High Court, the State Commission, the State Commission, The State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Review Petition, the State Commission, Review, the High Court, the State Commission, the Review Petition, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the High Court, State Commission, the State Commission, Appellant, Forums, the High Court, Appellant, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Corporate Tax, Appellant, Respondents, Purchasers, Appeal

CARDINAL: 24.11.2011, 2., 21.3.2011, 21.3.2011, 24.11.2011, 24.11.2011, 24.11.2011, 24.11.2011, 3, 4., 3.9.2012, 5, 26.9.2012, 6, 8., 6, 9, 10, 15.2.1997, 11, 9, 10, 11.5, 11, 12, 11.5, two, 28.4.2011, 24.11.2011, 11.5, 24.11.2011, 24.11.2011, 13.6.2012, 13.7.2012, 24.11.2011, 17.5.2011, 13, 14, three, 28.4.2011, 24.11.2011, 13.6.2012, 24.11.2011, 24.11.2011, 15, three, 16, 17

DATE: 2011, 2012, 25.11.1995, 15.12.1977, 17.10.2006, 90 days, 25.8.2007, the financial year 2005-06, the second five year, the First five year period, 2012, 17.5.2012, 2012, 17.5.2012, 182 days, 182 days, 2012, 90 Days of the end of each financial year, initial 5 financial years, the next 5 financial years, 25.11.1995, 7th December 1996, the first five years, the subsequent years, the second five year period, the first five years, the subsequent years, the year 1996, 5 financial years, Between 1997-2011, the 6th to 10th year, 2001, 2 2nd, 23.2.2004, March, 2011, 2011, 30 days, 2012, the very same day, 17.5.2012, 2012, 2012, 17.5.2012, 2011, 2011

PRODUCT: Appellant, Notification, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant

FAC: Review Petition No.2 of

GPE: Karnataka, Centre, Counsel, “In, Karnataka, Karnataka, Forums

LOC: Bellary District, Respondent

ORDINAL: 4th, second

EVENT: the Financial Year, under Structure ‘B. Both Structure

PERCENT: 30%, 100 %, 30 %, 46 %, 40%, 15 %, 30 %, 30 %, 30%

WORK_OF_ART: Structure, Structure, a Writ Petition