Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

In the Matter Of: Davangere Sugar Company Vs. Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission and Another

Decided On : Nov-14-2013

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: Power Purchase Agreement, Power Purchase Agreement, the Termination Notice, Article 9.1, Article 9.3.2, Article 9.1 of the PPA, Article 9.1, Article 5.2, Article 9.2.2, Article 4.2, Article 4.2, Article 5, Article 5, Article 6.1, Article 5.1, Article 6.2, Article 6.3, Article 5.1, Article 6.1, Article 4.2 of the PPA, Article 4.2, Article 9.2.2, Article 6.1, Article 6.1, Article 5, Article 5.1, Article 6.1, Article 6.2 of the PPA, Article 6.3, Article 5.1, Article 6.1, Article 9.2.2, Article 9.3 of the PPA, Article 9.1, Article 9.3.2, Article 9.1 of the PPA, the Supplemental Agreement, Article 9.1 of the PPA, the Supplemental Agreement, Article 5.2 of the Agreement, Section 11, Section 11, Section 11, Section 11

PERSON: M. Karpaga Vinayagam, Karnataka SLDC, Impugned Order, Res Judicata, Res, Res, Bangalore, Naganand, Articles 6.1, Naganand, Articles 5, Sri, Order, Petitioner, Generator, Res, Res, Vs Banamali Sen, Vs Banamali Sen, Shri Nariman, ¦, Res, Res, OP No.17

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 24.1.2013, 3, 5.7.2003, 9.6.2005, 19.12.2007, 22.12.2007, 10.4.2008, 21.4.2008, 21.4.2008, 12.3.2009, 4., 5, 8, three, 9, 10.4.2008, 8.10.2009, 11, 12, 8.10.2009, 13, 14, 15, 8.10.2009, 24.1.2013, 16, 8.10.2009, 17, 1, 2, 8.7.2009, 3, 9.6.2005, No.2, 8.7.2009, 8, twenty, twenty, three, 9, 10, 12, 20, 11, 1.4.2005, two, eighty, 12, 13, 6.2, 6.3, 6.2, 6.3, 6.2, 6.3, 6, 6.2, 6.3, 6.2, 6.3, 14, up to 60, only fifteen, 6.2, 6.3, 15, 13, 16, 13.8.2009, 9.3, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.5, 9.3, 6.2, 14, one, 9.3, 15, 9.3, 6.2, three, 9.3, 9.3, 16, fifteen, 6.2, 9.3, three, three, 17, 17, 8.10.2009, 18, 19, 20, 1, 2, 6, 10.4.2008, 7, 21, 8.7.2009, 10.4.2008, 10.4.2008, 22, 23, 24, 9, 25, 26, 27, 28, 9.1, twenty, twenty, 29, 30, 4, 10, 32, 33, 4, 17.8.1995, 10, two, two, two, 35, 37, two, 38, 39, 41, 43

ORG: M/s. Davangere Sugar Company Limited, Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission, the First Respondent, Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited, BESCOM, the High Court, the Appellant Company, BESCOM, KPTCL, BESCOM, The Appellant Company, BESCOM, 3rd Party, BESCOM, the Appellant Company, the Tata Power Company, the Tata Power Company, the Appellant Company, Application, the State Load Despatch Centre, Open Access, the State Load Despatch Centre, the Appellant Company, BESCOM, the Appellant Company, the Central Commission, the State Load Despatch Centre, Open Access, The Central Commission, Petition, Commission, this Tribunal in Appeal No.06/2008, the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission, the Power Purchase Agreements, the State Commission, the Central Commission, the Appellant Company, the Reliance Energy Trading Company Limited, Open Access, the State Commission, SLDC, Open Access, The State Commission, Open Access, the Appellant Company, BESCOM, the State Commission, the Appellant Company, the Appellant Company, Petition, the State Commission, The State Commission, Petition, Tribunal, BESCOM, the Honble Supreme Court, BESCOM, the State Commission, The State Commission, Petition, BESCOM, the Respondent Company, Appellant, the State Commission, the State Commission, 3rd party, the State Commission, the State Commission, the 3rd party, the Power Purchase Agreement, the State Commission, Counsel for the Respondent, OP No.17, Res Judicata, the State Commission, the Respondent Company, the State Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, the Honble Supreme Court, the State Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, the Honble Supreme Court, Respondents, the Respondent Company, the Power Purchase Agreement, the State Commission, the Respondent Company, The Central Commission, the Respondent Company, the Central Commission, Application, The Appellant Company, The State Commission, Application, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the State Commission, the Respondent Company, the Appellant Company, PPA, the Respondent Company, the State Commission, the Respondent Company, the Appellant Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, Tribunal, the State Commission, the Respondent Company, the Honble Supreme Court, the State Commission, OP No.17, the Respondent Company, Tribunal, Honble Supreme Court, the State Commission, Petition, the Respondent Company, BESCOM, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, the Respondent Company, OP No.17, Counsel for the Respondent, the State Commission, OP No.17, OP No.17, Respondents, Commission, the Respondent (Annexure J of the petition, Commission, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Exportable, MW, MW, Energy Charges, fed, Corporation, the Chief Engineer Electricity, Corporations Load Despatch Centre, Corporation, SBI, Company, M/s.Sandur Power Company Ltd., KPTCL, Respondents, Respondents, Respondents, Respondents, Respondents, the Petitioner Company, the Honble Supreme Court, Respondents, the Tariff Invoice, Respondents, Respondents, Respondents, Respondents, Emphasis, the State Commission, OP No.17 of, the Respondent Company, KPTCL, the Respondent Company, BESCOM, the State Commission, Tribunal, the Honble Supreme Court, the State Commission, CERC, the CERC Open Access Regulations, CERC, SLDC, Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (ATE, BESCOM, ATE, CERC, the State Commission, the State Commission, CERC, ATE, CERC, the Generating Company, the Procurer Company, the Generating Company, the Respondent Company, the Generating Company, the Generating Company, the Central Commission, The Central Commission, SLDC, the Central Commissions Open Access Regulations, The Appellate Tribunal, The Appellate Tribunal, the State Commission, Tribunal, the Generating Company, the Procurer Company, the Generating Company, NOC, the 3rd party, the Central Commission, the Generating Company, Tribunal, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, OP No.17, the Respondent Company, the State Commission, OP No.17 of, Clauses of the PPA, Clauses, the State Commission, The State Commission, the State Commission, the Respondent Company, the State Commission, the Scheduled Date of Completion, Corporation, The State Commission, OP No.17, Tribunal, the Honble Supreme Court, the State Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, the Honble Supreme Court, Respondents, AIR 1953 SC 33, Srimati Raj Lakshmi Dasi, Ferro Alloys Corporation Ltd Vs Union, K Ethiran (Dead, LRS Vs Lakshmi, Srimati Raj Lakshmi Dasi, AIR 1953 SC 33, Lordships, Coke, the Hindu Commentators, Vijnaneshwara, Nilakanta, Ferro Alloys Corporation Ltd Vs Union of India, the Central Government, the Sharma Committee, the Central Government, the Sharma Committee, Appellants, the Sharma Committee, the Central Government, Court, Court, Appellant, Court, K Ethiran (Dead, LRS Vs Lakshmi and Others, the Honble Supreme Court, Court, the Honble Supreme Court, CPC, CPC, Court, the State Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, OP No.17 of, OP No.17, the Appellate Tribunal in Appeal No.176, the Honble Supreme Court, the Appellant Company, 3rd party, the Power Purchase Agreement, the Respondent Company, OP No.42, Central, the Appellant Company, the Appellant Company, the State Commission, the Appellant Company, the State Commission, CPC, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Respondent Company, the State Commission, the Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Honble Supreme Court, State Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, the State Commission, The State Commission, OP No.17, Tribunal, the Honble Supreme Court

LOC: the Appellant herein, the Appellant through Open Access, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent

EVENT: the Second Respondent, each Billing Period

FAC: BESCOM, Application, BESCOM, the Delivery Point, the Delivery Point

ORDINAL: 3rd, 3rd, 3rd, 3rd, 3rd, third, 3rd, 3rd, 3rd, 3rd, first, first, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, 3rd, third, third, third, First, third, 3rd, third, 3rd, third, 3rd, 3rd, third, 3rd, 3rd, third, 3rd

DATE: 17.1.2002, 3 months, more than 3 months, 27.11.2007, 15.1.2008, 15.4.2008, 19.4.2008, 10.6.2009, 30 days, 8.7.2009, 8.7.2009, 2009, 18.5.2010, 16.11.2009, the months of July to December, 2008, 24.1.2013, 2009, 8.10.2009, 2009, 2009, 2009, 2009, 8.10.2009, 2008, 12.3.2009, 2009, 12.3.2009, 2009, 2009, 2009, 2009, 18.5.2010, 4.10.2010., 2009, the months, 2008, 2009, 2009, 2009, 2009, 2009, 17.01.2002, 20) years, ten (10) years, 90) days, 20) years, 3) months, season, season, monthly, ten (10) years, 17.1.2002, ten (10) years, every year, annual, 15 days, Articles 5, sixty) days, 15) days, three months, 90 days, three months, three months, 15 days, 15 days, three months, three months, every month, 15) days, 90) days, 15 days, one months, a period of, three months, one months, three months, fifteen days, 2009, three months, the year 2002, the year 2005, 2009, 17.1.2002, 8.7.2009, 17.1.002, a period of, 20 years, 17.1.2002, 9.6.2005, 19.12.2007, 18.5.2010, 17.1.2002, 19.4.2008, 8.7.2009, 18.5.2010, 2009, 17.1.2002, a period of, 20 years, 17.1.2002, 17.1.2002, 9.6.2005, 19.12.2007, 18.5.2010, 17.1.2002, 19.4.2008, 8.7.2009, 18.5.2010, 2009, 2009, 2009, 6, three months, three months, 20) years, ten (10) years, 90) days, 20) years, three months, 2009, 31, 1994, 2003, 1994, 17.8.1995, 34, 2003, 36, the year 2008, 2009, 2009, 2009, 2009, 2009, 40, 1009, 42, 2009, 2009, 44

PRODUCT: Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Appellant, No.1, Respondent, Open Access, Respondent, Respondent, No.1, No.1, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant

WORK_OF_ART: Open Access, Open Access, Open Access, Open Access, OP No.17 of, Appellant and KPTCL, Open Access, Open Access, Open Access, The Open Access, Open Access

GPE: India, India, Appeal, Katayana, India

PERCENT: 2%, 2%

NORP: Indian, Petitioners, ‘issue

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //