Prem Singh and Others Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi Through Commissioner of Police and Others

Decided On : Mar-06-2013

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi

LAW: Section 379 IPC, Section 294 IPC, Section 294 IPC, Section 294 IPC, Section 294 IPC, Section 325/34 IPC, Section 304, 324/34 of, Section 25, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Penal Code, the Penal Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 323/506 IPC, Section 504 IPC, Section 323 IPC, Section 504 IPC, Section 506 IPC, Section 336 IPC, Article 311 of the Constitution, Section 153-A IPC, Section 302 Cr, Section 323/504/506, Section 325/506 IPC, Section 323/325/34 IPC, Section 19

PERSON: G. George Paracken, Rajasthan, Sushil Kumar, Mukesh, Brij Lal, Shiv Lal, Sita Ram, Prem Singh, Rajasthan, Prem Singh, No.13231, Sushil Kumar, Daya Shankar Yadav Vs, Mukesh, Prem Singh, Brij Lal, Shiv Lal, Sita Ram, Sushil Kumar, Chuttan Lal Bairva, Rajwanti Devi, Chet Ram, Rajesh Kumar Meena, No.13231, Sushil Kumar, Daya Shankar Yadav Vs, Gopal Bairwa, Chuttan Lal Bairva, Rajesh Kumar Meena, Chet Ram, Raj Kumar, Sikar, Sushil Kumar, Pushkar Singh, Ram Chander, Raj Kumar, Raj Kumar, Sikar, No.13231, Sushil Kumar, Memo No, Pushkar Singh, Ram Chander, Deepa Tomar, C.J.M. Bagpat, Deepa Tomar, Deepa Tomar, No.13231, Sushil Kumar, Shankar Yadav, Deepa Tomar, Deepa Tomar, Deepa Tomar, Deepa Tomar, IPC P. S. Baraut, C.J.M. Bagpat, Deepa Tomar, Ms Deepa Tomar, No.13231, Sushil Kumar, Ms Deepa Tomar, Ms Deepa Tomar, Tomar, Shri Jitender Singh, Ms Deepa Tomar(Roll No.201946, Shiv Sing, Bharatpur, Rajasthan, Sushil Kumar, Ram Bharose, Amar, Jagdish, Manoj, Jal Singh, Shiv Singh, Shri Anil Singal, Shri Sachin, Shri Anil Singal, Haryana, Haryana, Bhiwani, Shri Singal, Jean Valjean', Les Miserables', Jean Valjean, Watkin Powell, Shri Singal, Jai Prakash, Sunil Kumar, Ram Het Meena v. Union, Veer Singh, No.1694/2011, Omveer Yadavs, Sushil Kumar, R. Radhakrishnan, Sushil Kumar, Sushil Kumar, R. RAdhakrishnan Vs, Sushil Kumar, R. Radhakrishnan, R. Radhakrishnan, Sushil Kumar, Jai Prakash, Delhi Vs, Sushil, Singh v. Punjab, Anr, Sushil Kumar, xx xx xx 10.  xx xx xx 11.Â, xx xx xx 12.Â, xx xx xx 13.Â, xx xx xx, Shri Anil Vs, Ghurey Lal, Ghurey Lal Vs, Anr, Robin Singh, Anr, Robin Singh, Bench, J., Meenas, Robin Singhs, Anr, Robin Singh, Robin Singhs, Haryana, Amar Singh, Sajjan Singh, Kumar Yadav, Anr, WP(C, Badar Durrez Ahmed, J., Anr, Ramanuj Upadhyay, WP(C, Kumar Yadavs, Samraj Singh, Anoop Kumars, Bittoo Singh, R. K. Puram, Manish Sagar, Piyush Sagar, Piyush Sagar, Bittoo Singhs, Singh, Bittoo Singh, Bittoo Singh, Bittoo Singh, Bittoo Singh, 8.Â

CARDINAL: 1, five, 2, 22.3.2011, 3., 11.5.2011, 24.11.2010, 14.03.2011, 4499/2011 4, 11.5.2011, One, 24.11.2010, 14.03.2011, 379, one, One, 5, 25.11.2010, 283/07, 22.05.2008, 14.10.2007, 14/15, 147/336, 22.05.2008, 6, 22.3.2011, 22.05.2008, 25.11.2010, 14.10.2007, 14/15, 147/336, 22.05.2008, 364, 24.11.2010, 2006)-Daya, 30.12.2011, 24.11.2010, 2006)-, 21.11.2011, 10, 11, 12, 4, 13, Rs.2000, 4-6-1980, three, 14, thousands and thousands, 15, two, 14, 17.3.2011, 2, 15, 24.5.2010, 15.3.2011, 15.2.2012, 6.9.2012, 16, 11, 578, 206, 11, 605, 17, 11, 6-5, 4., 1, 175, 5., 7, 8., 5.6.2009, 6, 8, 9, 22, 23.Â, 24, one, 25, 15.Â, 10, 16, 18.Â, 6., 506, 8, 9, 19.Â, three, 171, one, 17.Â, 20.Â, 5., 6., One, 171, 16, 38, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, two, 22, 25, two, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 1, 31, 32, 2.2.1973, 131, 34, 35, thousands and thousands, 36, 37, 38, 8, 9, 10, 21.Â, 25.07.2002, 11.05.2011, 22.Â, 23.Â, one, 30.03.2012, one, two, One, 09.07.2012, 12, 13, 14, 24.Â, 8.12.2009, 25.Â, 26.12.2007, 8.1.2008, one, 8.8.2004, 49, two, two, one, four, Two, one, two, 313, four, Only two, four, two, five, Two, five, two, five, four, 302, 376, one, 5.7

GPE: OA, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, India, Delhi, Delhi, OA, OA, Delhi, Delhi, India, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Balbir, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Balbir, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, India, Civil, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, India, Civil, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, OA, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Pawan, Bhiwani, India, Wales, London, England, Wales, Wales, Delhi, Govt, Delhi, Govt, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Govt, Delhi, OA, OA, India, OA, NCT Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, India, Delhi, India, United States of America, Canada, Philippines, India, India, India, New Delhi, Delhi, India, P.C., OA, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, OA, New Delhi, Jaipal, Jaipal, Anoop, Jaipal, Jaipal, Jaipal, OA, OA, OA

DATE: 14.3.2011, 15.02.2007, 04.12.2009, 1996, 14.02.2007, 18.05.2009, 2009, 15.02.2007, 04.12.2009, 2010, 2006, the year 2009, 04.12.2009, 14.3.2011, 18.05.2009, 1996, 14.11.2006, 18.05.2009, 2009, 18.05.2009, 2010, 2006, 14.11.2006, 18.05.2009, the year 2009, 13231 of 1996, 411137, fifteen days, the year 2009, 2010, 15 days, merits.” 8, 2010, 14.12.2011, 2503/2011 9, the year 2009, 13231 of 1996, 17.10.2009, Rs.10,000/-, 904386, ten days, 1996, three months, the same day, today, only 20 years of age, about 20 years of age, three months, Wednesday of last week, a week, 1970, 27.8.2010, 1996, almost a year, November, (1996, almost after one year, 16th October, 2008, 16th October, 2008, Kumar 1996, a period of, two months, 14, 1980, 2008, 25.08.2010, March 1969, under Section 323/504, 2068/2010, 22, the next two, March 1969, 2755, 33, three years, less than 3 years, Today, a week or, ten days, 13.1.2009, four weeks, today, the year 2009, 14.03.2011, 22.07.2001, 66-0339, 28.05.2007, law.” 11, seven years, 23.7.2008, 20.1.2012, 24.1.2012, 24.3.2006, 1985, 23.7.2008, 24.8.2007, 5.8.2004, few days ago, many days ago

ORG: Constable (Executive, FIR, U/s, IPC, PS Laxmangarh, Court, the Screening Committee of PHQ, the Commissioner of Police, SLP, the Screening Committee, IPC, Honble Court, U/s 341/323/354/379, IPC, The Screening Committee, FIR, IPC, Sections 321/341/325 IPC, FIR, Constable (Executive, Tribunal, the Criminal Court, Constable (Executive, Constable (Exe., FIR, U/s, IPC, PS Laxmangarh, the Screening Committee of PHQ, the Commissioner of Police, Honble Supreme Court, SLP, SLP, Union of India, No.3827/Rectt, FIR, the Honble Court, SCN, Department, FIR, IPC, Honble Court, Delhi Police, the Screening Committee, FIR, Constable (Exe., Constable (Executive, Scrutiny of your Application Form and Attestation Form, FIR, U/s 341/323/354/379, IPC, PS Mundawar, Distt, Dausa, Court, the Screening Committee of PHQ, the Commissioner of Police, SLP, the Screening Committee, U/s 341/323/354/379, IPC, The Screening Committee, FIR, U/s 341/323/354/379, IPC, PS Mundawar, Dausa, Court, Application Form and Attestation Form, the Screening Committee of PHQ, the Commissioner of Police, Honble Supreme Court, SLP, SLP, Union of India, No.3851/Rectt, IPC, FIR, FIR, U/s 341/323/354/379, IPC, the Screening Committee, FIR, Constable (Exe., Constable (Exe., U/S 143/323/451/336, IPC, PS Shrimadho Pur, Court, the Screening Committee of PHQ, the Commissioner of Police, the Screening Committee, Hari, cognizance u/s 147/451/323/336, IPC, IPC, Show Cause, Constable (Exe., Constable (Exe., Application Form and Attestation Form, IPC, PS Shrimadho Pur, Court, the Screening Committee of PHQ, the Commissioner of Police, SLP, the Screening Committee, FIR, Hari, cognizance u/s 147/451/323/336, IPC, IPC, the Screening Committee, the Commissioner of Police, Constable (Exe., Constable (Exe., W/Constable, the Application Form and Attestation Form, IPC P.S. Baraut, Bagpat, UP, Case No.2352/05, Court, UP, Court, the Screening Committee, the Commissioner of Police, Standing Order, the Screening Committee, Committee, Hon'ble Supreme Court, SLP, SLP, UOI, Ors, State, State, the Screening Committee, Delhi Police, Constable (Exe., W/Constable, the Application Form and Attestation Form, C.N., Bagpat, UP, Case No.2352/05, Court, UP, the Screening Committee, the Commissioner of Police, Standing Order, the Screening Committee, Committee, Hon'ble Supreme Court, SLP, SLP, UOI, Ors, No.8110/Rectt, AC, PHQ, 09.11.2011, Constable (Exe., the Screening Committee, Show Cause Notice, Constable (Exe., Constable (Exe., U/S 143/323/341/379, IPC, PS Sewar, Distt, Court, the Screening Committee of PHQ, the Commissioner of Police, the Screening Committee, Fridge, The Screening Committee, Show Cause, Constable (Exe., OA-2503/2011, The Apex Court, Tribunal, Constable (Executive, the Apex Court, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, IPC, The Apex Court, State, Court, Court, Parliament, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, treasury, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, F.I.R. No.231/3-6-1980, FIR, IPC, Parliament, Rs.2000/-, the High Court, the Apex Court, Sandeep Kumar, The Apex Court, a Head Constable (Executive, the Apex Court, the Commissioner of Police, the Delhi High Court, Welsh, the High Court, the High Court, the Court of Appeals, Crown Office, the Honble High Court, Omveer Yadav, WP No.12899/2009, 19.4.2010, WP No.5768/2010, WP No.9314/2009, Delhi v. Manjeet (WP, the Honble High Court, Delhi Administration, AIR 2008, SC, the Apex Court, Sections 304, 324/34 of, IPC, The High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, FIR, FIR, Reliance, the Metropolitan Magistrate, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Delhi Administration and Ors, AIR 2008, SC, Tribunal, IPC, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, FIR, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Tribunal, Court, the High Court, Tribunal, Constable, Screening Committee, the Commissioner of Police, the Honble Supreme Court, the Screening Committee, Reliance, Haryana High Court, Bhag, Sind Bank 2006, Cashier, Bank, Railway Protection Force, Tribunal, FIR, Committee, SI, Tribunal, Vivek Mathur Vs, FIR, the Honble Supreme Court, Delhi Police, Govt, Central Administrative Tribunal, Police Headquarters, S.O., CO Police Headquarters, 09.04.2010, Court, FIR, the Apex Court, Uttar Pradesh, the Apex Court, Tribunal, Sunil Kumar, the Honble High Court, the High Court, Court, W.P., the State of Haryana, Court, IPC, W.P., S.I. (Executive, Dinesh Kumar, the High Court, DLT 705 Government of NCT, Court, Pradeep Nandrajog, Competent Court of Law, Constable-Driver, CISF, the High Court, a Criminal Court, DLT, attributes:-, State, State, Government, No.6857, the State of, Haryana, IPC, the Summary Courts, Court, Court, Constable (Exe., the Delhi Police, FIR, Sections 148/149/323/427/506 of, IPC, District Mahendergarh, the Trial Court, the Screening Committee, the Screening Committee, FIR, The Screening Committee, FIR, the Trial Court, the Screening Committee, the Screening Committee, FIR, “We, The High Court, FIR, the Trial Court, the Trial Court, FIR, FIR, The Screening Committee, the Screening Committee, Court, FIR, the Delhi Police, the Trial Court, FIR, the Screening Committee, FIR, Tribunal, FIR, FIR, Constable, FIR, Shani, the Screening Committee, FIR, Tribunal, IPC, Original Application, Tribunal, ASJ, Vikas, FIR, Central School, Vikas, Vikas, Ajay, Vikas, Vikas, CrPC, FIR, FIR, FIR, FIR, FIR, FIR, FIR, Ajay, Vikas, IPC, IPC, IPC, the Honble High Court, FIR, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Division Bench

WORK_OF_ART: Show Cause Notice, Show Cause Notice, 'Due Process of Law', the Orders of this Tribunal in Anoop Kumar v.

QUANTITY: 323/341/ 325 IPC

TIME: about 3:00 PM, about 3:00 PM, about 8:00 PM, 11.11.2010, the hour, 1.30 pm, 1.40 pm

NORP: Dist, Satish, R. Radhakrishnans, Punjab, British, British

EVENT: OA 245/2012 7, Victor Hugo's

FAC: Delhi Police-205, Manoj, the Delhi Police, an All India Seminar on, India Seminar, Deepak Kumar and Others

PRODUCT: Bahadur SinghJatav S/o, Dinesh Kumar, 605, FIR No.526/04, Brahm Prakash

ORDINAL: first, third, 24th, first, second, first, first, fourth, first, first, first, second

LANGUAGE: English, English, English

LOC: Executive, Spaceship Earth