Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Mohd. AmeeruddIn Vs. Station Manager, the Indian Airlines

Decided On : May-10-1999

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

LAW: Rule 22, Section 3, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6

PERSON: S. Parvatha Rao, 59,144,40 Ps, Madras

CARDINAL: 1, 7.8.1990, 1,59,144.40, 2, 24.7.1989, 59,144.40, 3, 2, “(2, 1, 22(4, 9, 2.7.1999, 29th/

ORG: Indian Airlines, the Indian Airlines, Pakistan International Airlines Corporation, Karachi, PIA, Indian Airlines, Hyderabad, the Indian Airlines Authorities, the Begumpet Airlines, the Missing Baggage Receipt, Indian Airlines, the Missing Baggage Receipt, the Indian Airlines, the Indian Airlines, the Indian Airlines, Indian Airlines, “We, Finance Department, Indian Rupees, the Indian Airlines, the Indian Airlines, Exs, Baggage Liability Limitations, the First Schedule of The Carriage by Air Act, the Indian Airlines

DATE: 28.7.1989, 27.7.1989, 27.7.1989, the same day, couple of days, 29th/31st January, 1990, 1972, the 12th day of October, Rule 22, 1972, 1972, eight weeks, today, January, 1990, 5th March, 1990

PERCENT: 24%

GPE: US, US, Dhahran, Bombay, Bombay, India, Bombay, Saudi Arabia, INR, US, US, US, US, India, Warsaw, C.D., US

QUANTITY: 9 kg, 9 kgs

MONEY: 180, USD 20/-, approximately US $ 9.07, 20.00, 400, 1,250, 250 francs, of250 francs, 2,250 francs, 20

ORDINAL: First

TIME: 22.00 hours

WORK_OF_ART: claim.” Along

PRODUCT: B-2

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //