Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Lt. Col. T.S. Bakshi Vs. Managing Director, Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation

Decided On : May-17-2001

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

LAW: the Consumer Protection Act, the C.P. Act, Section 2(1)(d, the C.P. Act, the C.P. Act, the Consumer Protection Act

PERSON: K.K. Srivastava, Chandigarh, T.S. Bakshi, Retd, Singh Bakshi, P.S.I.E.C., Chandigarh, Singh Bakshi, Receipt No, Singh, T.S. Bkshi, Retd, H.S. Khanna, Anr, T.S. Bakshi, Retd, Chandigarh, Anr, Daly Kumar, P-5, Mohan Singh, Mohan Singh, Baljinder Singh, Chandigarh, M.K. Gupta, Haryana, Sukhpal Singh Kang, Anr, Fora, Fora, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, U.T. Chandigarh

CARDINAL: 1, 22.12.2000, 885, 18, 2., 10,000/-, 5.8.1998, 24.5.1999, 7.8.1997, 7.8.2000, 20.12.2000, 3, 4., 5., 867, one, 40,10,000/-, 22.3.1993, 6, 2, 26,25,000/-, 8, 432, 1, 19, 7, 8, six, 51, 249, 45, 1, 6, 2,550/-, 51.00, 5, 51.00, 5.10, 5.10, 9, 7, 10, 8, two, 11, 12, 13

ORG: the District Consumer, Mohali, District Forum-II, The District Forum-II, The District Forum-II, the Honble National Consumer, the National Commission, Shiela Constructions Pvt. Ltd., Nainital Lake Development Authority and Ors, CPJ 11, the District Forum-II, Commission, Chandigarh Administration, Manimajra, this State Commission, The State Commission, The State Commission, the State Commission, Ors, Chandigarh Administration, CPJ 428, Commission, the State Commission, This State Commission, Lucknow Development Authority, the High Court of Punjab, the Honble National Commission, Shiela Constructions Pvt, Nainital Lake Development Authority, CPJ 11, SC, Shiela Constructions Pvt. Ltd., Nainital Lake Development Authority, Nainital, District Magistrate, the Hon'ble National Commission, Authority, Kripalu Construction Pvt, the Nainital Lake Development Authority's, Authority, the Hon'ble National Commission, the Nainital Lake Development Authority, Commission, Shiela Constructions Pvt. Ltd., Mohali, the District Forum-II, the Hon'ble National Commission, Shiela Constructions Pvt. Ltd., the District Forum-II, the District Forum-II

GPE: U.T., G.P.A., U.S.A., India, U.S.A., U.S.A., Counsel, New Delhi, NC, M.D., Singh, Singh, U.T., U.T., U.T.

FAC: the District Forum-II, the District Forum-II, Bhupinder Pal Singh, Bhupinder Pal Singh, the District Forum-II, the District Forum-II, the District Forum-II

WORK_OF_ART: Complaint Case No

DATE: July, 1997, 17.7.1997, 5/96/25460, 18.3.1998, 15.5.1998, the month of August, 1998, 8.8.1998, 13.8.1998, 7.8.1998, 24.3.1999, 12.8.1999, 18.10.1999, 16.11.1999, 1986, 1996, 1997, 58, 23.4.1990, 16.8.1990, 2000, 17.12.1997, annual, 1986, the year of 1992, 16.10.1998, 1996, 1986-99, 17.9.1991, 2000, 17.9.1991, 1993, 2000, 19.10.1991, 2000, 17.9.1991, one month, next three months, — years, 6 months, 17th September, 1991, 17.9.1991, 17.7.1997, 11.6.2001

PERCENT: the 90%, 18%, 10%, 90%, 25%, 10%, 10%, 20%, 80%

ORDINAL: firstly, Firstly, Secondly

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //