Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Govind Ram Mittal Vs. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd.

Decided On : May-29-2003

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

LAW: Section 12, the Consumer Protection Act

PERSON: Rumnita Mittal, Shalimar Bagh, M.T.N.L.

CARDINAL: 1, 30.10.2001, 2, two, 10.7.2000, 10.10.2000, 16.7.2000 to 15.9.2000, 3., 16.8.2000, 2/3.9.2000, 16.7.2000 to 15.9.2000, 9.9.2000, 4., 13.7.2000 to 30.9.2000, 5., 2,000/-, 6., 16/17.8.2000 to 2/3.9.2000, 31.8.2000, 2.9.2000, 9.9.2000, 11.9.2000, 12.9.2000, 2/3.9.2000, 8., 2,000/-, 9

ORG: District Forum, District Forum, District Forum, District Forum, the District Forum, the District Forum, District Forum, Commission, District Forum, District Forum, the District Forum, Commission

GPE: Delhi

WORK_OF_ART: Complaint Case No

DATE: 3157/2001, 1986, 7270984, 7270984, two weeks, 270984, 7270984, two and half months, 7270984, next day, 7270984, about two and half months, 7270984, 45 days

ORDINAL: first

FAC: the District Forum

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //