Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and Another Vs. Narinder Singh

Decided On : Jan-28-2009

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

LAW: Section 2(21, Motor Vehicles Act, Section 2(16, Motor Vehicles Act, Section 2(47

PERSON: K.C. Gupta, Disputes Redressal Forum Panipat, Singh, Singh, Mark Mahindra, Singh, R.T.O. Sonitpur, Assam, Surveyor, Pushpinder Singh, Surveyor, Counsel, R.K. Bashamboo, Varun Katyal, Singh, Pushipinder Singh, Singh

CARDINAL: 1, 1,50,000, 15.2.2000, 2., 2, 23.7.1999, 3, 65, 21.3.1999, 2, 2,95,330.90, 1,78,000, 4., 5., 2,95,330.90, 1,78,000, 1,50,000, 4,000. 6, 29.1.2002, 8., 9, 10, 2, 24.7.98, 23.7.1999, 21.3.1999, 11, more than six, more than twelve, 12, 6.11.2000, 29.9.2000, 21.3.1999, 13, 224, 30.7.2001, 14., 5,000, 15

WORK_OF_ART: 29.1.2002

ORG: District Consumer Forum, Mahindra, FIR, District Consumer Forum, Mahindra, Mahindra, Maxi, United India Insurance Company, Motor Vehicles Act,1988 defines “Maxi, Heavy Passenger Motor, District Transport Officer, Sonitpur, Tejpur, Assam, goods(transport, the District Consumer Forum, the Motor Vehicles Act, Haryana State Consumer Commission, Mandip Bus Service, United India Insurance Company Ltd.

PERCENT: 9%

GPE: p.a., Vehicle”

DATE: 1997, 1997, 30.9.1997, 1998

QUANTITY: 7500 kilograms, 12,000 kilograms, 12,000 kilograms

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //