Kamal Singh Vs. Nokia Care and Another

Decided On : May-21-2009

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

LAW: Consumer Protection Act

PERSON: S.P. Kapoor, U.T., Chandigarh, Kamal Singh v. Incharge, C-3, Bangalore, Alok Batara, Kamal Singh, Manish Joshi, Jaspal Singh, Kamal Singh, Anish Gautam

CARDINAL: 1, 344, 2, one, 10,800, 1, 2, 1,500, 112, 1, 1, one, 1, 1, 1, one, 1, 1, 3., 1, 1, 1, 4,500, 112, 4,388, 1, 4, 2, 2, 5., 1, 1, 15,000, 112, 1, 4,500, 1, 1,388, 112, 1,388, 1, 1,388, 6., 1 and Sh, 2, 8, 2, 1, 1, 1, 9, 10, 112, 1, 1, 4,388, 1, 1,500, 4,500, 1,500, 112, 10,800, 1,388, 11, 12, 5,000, 1,100, 5,000, 13

ORG: District Consumer, District Forum, Nokia Care, Nokia Mobile Set, Chandigarh vide Invoice (C-1, “On Off, District Forum, Annexure C-3, “non, District Forum, District Forum, District Forum, Annexure C-3, District Forum, District Forum, District Forum, District Forum, District Forum, District Forum, District Forum, District Forum, Bench, Counsel, District Forum, District Forum

DATE: 17.10.2008, 13.10.2006, a week, 26.10.2006, 4-5 days, 4.11.2006, a week, 26.10.2000, 1.11.2006, 1986, 1.11.2006, a period of, 30 days

WORK_OF_ART: Complaint Case No

PRODUCT: Suresh Chauhan

ORDINAL: first

GPE: Gautam