Sub Post Master Vs. Ashok Kumar and Another. - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Dec-04-2009

Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

LAW: Section 6, the Consumer Protection Act

PERSON: Barkat Ali Zaidi, Rajiv Bansal, Pooja Bansal, R.P. Nos, Akhil Bhartiya, Grahak Panchayat, Anr, Imphal, Jamini Devi Sagolband, B.K. Agarwal, Sunil Sharma, Vishnu Mehra, Mehra

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 10,000, 2,000, 3., 4, 5, 1,000, 6, 18.9.2002, 230, 28, two, 25, 8., 50, 4,000, 9, 10, 11

ORG: IIT, The Post Office, the Post Office, District Forum, The District Forum, Post Office, Commission, The National Commission, Revision Petition No, Consumer Forum, the National Commission, the State Commission, Vijay Ratan Aggarwals and Ors, “We, Speed Post, District Forums, State Commission, Postal Department, the Central Government, Post Master, Post Office Act, Postal Authorities, Indian Post Office Rules, the Department of Posts, the District Forum, Bank Guarantee/FDR

FAC: the District Forum

DATE: 18th September, 2002, 15 of 1997, 1006 of 2001, 1035, 1995, 2000, 1933, three months, 1986, 50, one month

GPE: Revisions, Counsel

ORDINAL: first, second

NORP: Rules