Vaibhavi A. Khot Vs. Vithaldham C.H.S.Ltd Through Chairman/Secretary

Decided On : May-03-2012

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

LAW: the Consumer Protection Act

PERSON: Dhanraj Khamatkar, Complainant, 31/12/2007, Disputes Redressal Forum, Vaibhavi A. Khot Vs, Vithaldham Co-operative, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Bindu Jain, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Letter, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Disputes Redressal Forum, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant

CARDINAL: 1, 2]Â, 29/2/2000, 7/11/2000, 26/4/2001, 9/4/2000, 4]Â, 5]Â, 29/2/2000, 7/11/2000, 26/5/2001, two, 16/3/2000, 898.50, 7/11/2000, two, 16/3/2000, one, 7, one, 7/11/2000, 7/11/2000, 16/3/2000, 7/11/2000, 9]Â, ‘service, 10, 11, 7/11/2000, 26/5/2001, 31, 101, 898.50, 690

PRODUCT: Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Rs.41,164/-, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Rs.7,58,000/-, Appellant, Appellant, Rs.7,58,000/-, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant

ORG: the Mumbai Suburban District, Consumer Complaint No.440, Housing Society Ltd., Opponent Society, Society, Opponent Society, Opponent Society, Society, the District Collector, the District Collector, Appellant, Opponent Society, Opponent, Opponent Society, Opponent Society, Opponent Society, Societies, Opponent Society, Societies, Opponent Society, Appellant, Opponent Society, Opponent Society, Opponent Society, the District Forum the Respondent/original Opponent Society, Opponent Society, Appellant, Opponent Societys, Opponent Society, Opponent Society, Appellant, Opponent Societys, Opponent Society, Society, Opponent Society, Consumer Forum, Opponent Society, Opponent Society, Opponent Society, the District Forum, Appellant, Complainant and Adv, Opponent Society, Opponent Society, Appellant, Opponent Society, No.101, Appellant, Opponent Society, Society, Opponent Society, Society, Opponent Society, the District Collector, Appellant, Opponent Society, Opponent Society, Opponent Society, Opponent Society, No.101, Special General Body Meeting, Rs.4,00,000/-, Opponent Society, Opponent Society, Opponent Society, Allotment, Opponent Society, Special General Body, Opponent Society, Opponent Society, Opponent Society, Opponent Society, Opponent Society, Opponent Society, Opponent, Opponent Society, the Complainant/Appellant, Societies, the District Forum, Society, Opponent Society, Opponent Society, Opponent Society, Opponent Society, Opponent Society, the Mumbai Suburban District, Consumer Complaint No.440, Opponent Society, carpet area, Opponent Society, Opponent Society, Appellant

DATE: 2004, 10/8/1996, 21/12/1997, 1/6/2001, 29/7/2001, 1960, 1960, the month of May-2001, Rs.23,062/-, 1986, 24/12/2003, 1960, 10/8/1996, 21/12/1997, Rs.41,164/-, 1/6/2001, 21/12/1997, 21/12/1997, 21/12/1997, 21/12/1997, 21/12/1997, the year 2001, 2004, a period of, two months, Rs.25,000/-

LOC: Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent

FAC: Rs.7,58,000/-, Rs.7,58,000/-, Rs.7,58,000/-

GPE: Societies, Societies, Societies, Societies, p.a., Rs.1,00,000/-, Societies, I.C.D., Societies, p.a.

PERCENT: 18%, 12%