Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Punjab State Electricity Board, Ludhiana Through Its Senior Xen Vs. Pankaj Kumar

Decided On : Oct-08-2013

Court : Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chandigarh

LAW: Section 126, the Electricity Act, Section 126, the Electricity Act, Section 126, the Electricity Act, the Electricity Act, the Consumer Protection Act, Section 2(1)(d, the Consumer Protection Act, the Electricity Act, the Consumer Protection Act, the Electricity Act, the Consumer Protection Act, Section 2(1)(o, Section 2(1)(c, the Consumer Protection Act, Section 126, the Electricity Act, the Consumer Protection Act, the Electricity Act

ORG: Baldev Singh Sekhon, the District Consumer, Forum”, NRS, AEE Technical, Textile Engineer, the District Forum, the Honble Supreme Court, U.P. POWER CORPORATION LTD, ORS, the Central Government, the State Government, law”., the Honble Supreme Court, Consumer Protection Act, Consumer Forum, the Honble Supreme Court, the District Forum, the District Forum, the District Forum, Commission

CARDINAL: 1, 2., two, 6.4.2008, 3., 4., 5., 6., 7, 8., 2013(13, 226, 135 to 140, 9, 10, 11

DATE: 10.2.2009, Rs.69,540/-, the last week of January, 2008, Rs.69,540/-, 21.1.2008, Rs.69,540/-, 2003, 2003, 21.1.2008, 2003, 2003, 1986, 1986, 2003, 1986, 2003, 1986, 1986, 2003, 1986, 2003

PERSON: Disputes Redressal Forum, Ludhiana, meter, Sandeep, “if

WORK_OF_ART: ME Lab

PRODUCT: No.1

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //