Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Punjab State Electricity Board, Ludhiana Through Its Senior Xen Vs. Pankaj Kumar
Decided On : Oct-08-2013
Court : Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chandigarh
LAW: Section 126, the Electricity Act, Section 126, the Electricity Act, Section 126, the Electricity Act, the Electricity Act, the Consumer Protection Act, Section 2(1)(d, the Consumer Protection Act, the Electricity Act, the Consumer Protection Act, the Electricity Act, the Consumer Protection Act, Section 2(1)(o, Section 2(1)(c, the Consumer Protection Act, Section 126, the Electricity Act, the Consumer Protection Act, the Electricity Act
ORG: Baldev Singh Sekhon, the District Consumer, Forumâ, NRS, AEE Technical, Textile Engineer, the District Forum, the Honble Supreme Court, U.P. POWER CORPORATION LTD, ORS, the Central Government, the State Government, lawâ., the Honble Supreme Court, Consumer Protection Act, Consumer Forum, the Honble Supreme Court, the District Forum, the District Forum, the District Forum, Commission
CARDINAL: 1, 2., two, 6.4.2008, 3., 4., 5., 6., 7, 8., 2013(13, 226, 135 to 140, 9, 10, 11
DATE: 10.2.2009, Rs.69,540/-, the last week of January, 2008, Rs.69,540/-, 21.1.2008, Rs.69,540/-, 2003, 2003, 21.1.2008, 2003, 2003, 1986, 1986, 2003, 1986, 2003, 1986, 1986, 2003, 1986, 2003
PERSON: Disputes Redressal Forum, Ludhiana, meter, Sandeep, âif
WORK_OF_ART: ME Lab
PRODUCT: No.1