Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ashok Bansilal Mutha and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Decided On : Jul-31-2012

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

LAW: Section 32A, Rule 4

ORG: B.P., GP, Learned Counsel, the Bombay Stamp, Determination of True Market Value of Property) Rules, Writ Petition, Court, Learned Government Pleader, Court, Division Bench, Court, Prasadnagar Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., Court, Collector, Hon, Apex Court, Adilabad, A.P.

PERSON: Heard Adv, Mantri, Kurundkar, Nagpur Vs, L.J. 310, Mantri, Jawajee Nagnatham Vs

CARDINAL: 2., 3, 4., 5, 6., 2, 4, 595, 8, 9

FAC: Bombay Stamp Act

DATE: 1958, 1995, annual, 1990, 2005, 1994, annual

NORP: Maharashtra

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //