Pankaj Kumar Agarwal Vs. Omendra Kumar Chowdhury and Others

Decided On : Jul-24-2017

Court : Kolkata

LAW: Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 340, Section 341 of the Code of 1973, Section 340, section 340, section 195, section 340, section 340, Section 341, Section 341 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 341, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, section 6, section 6, section 341, section 5, section 5 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, section 4, the Constitution Bench, the Constitution Bench, Section 476, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Code of Civil Procedure or, Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 476, Section 439, Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Order IX Rule 9, Section 476, Section 476, Section 340, Section 476, Section 476, Section 476B, Section 476, Section 476, Section 195(6, a Division Bench, Section 476, Section 341, Section 476 or Section 476A, Section 341, Section 340, Section 340 of the Code, Section 340, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 107, a Division Bench, Section 482 CrPC, Section 341, Section 476B, Section 341, Section 340, Section 341, Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 195(3, Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 195(1)(b, the Penal Code, Section 195(1)(b)(i, Section 195(1)(b, the Penal Code, Section 476, Section 476B, Section 476, Section 341, Section 340, Section 476, Section 476, Section 476, Section 195, Section 476B, Section 476, Section 476B, Section 476B, Section 476B, Section 341, Section 340, Section 476B, Section 341, Section 340, Section 341, Section 340, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Constitution Bench, Section 341, Section 341, Section 340, Section 340, Section 340, Section 340, Section 340

DATE: 2017, 2016, July 18, 2017, July 24, 2017, March of this year, 1973, 1973, 1865, the first day of, 2006, 2004, 1908, 1898, 1961, 1923, 1977, 2006, 1965, S.C. 1442, 1443, 2012, 2017, 1988, 1966, 1978, 1961, 1898, 1898, 1898, 1973, 1973, 1898, 1898, 1973, 1898, November 27, 1916, 1865, March 11, 1911,, December 9, 1927, December 12, 1928, 2017, 2016, 2017

ORG: ACO, LIQN, High Courts, Central, Division Bench, Supreme Court, Division Bench, a High Court, this High Court, Court, a High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the High Court, Court, High Court, the Government of India Act, High Court, Division Court, sec, the Government of India Act, the High Court, High Court, Division Court, sec, the Government of India Act, Court, Division Court, Their Privy Council, Court, Pashupati Nath De Vs, the High Court, Letters Patent, Court, Division Bench, the Supreme Court, P.S. Sathappan, Andhra Bank Ltd., the Letters Patent, The Supreme Court, Bench, the Supreme Court, Pragna M Pai, the Original Side of the Bombay High Court, The Supreme Court, the Larger Bench, the Supreme Court, P.S Sathappan, Letters Patent, the Supreme Court, Court, Pashupati Nath De, Supreme Court, Andhra Bank Limited, Letters Patent, Letters Patent, the High Court, Section 104 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Division Bench, CWN647(Har, the High Court, a High Court, Narain Das, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, a High Court, the Allahabad High Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, Chattu Gope, the Small Causes Court, inter alia, the Small Causes Court, Single Bench, the Small Causes Court, Clause 15, the High Court, High Court, Pashupati Nath De, Court, the Supreme Court, the Letters Patent, Court, the Delhi High Court, a High Court, Letters Patent, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Punjab & Haryana High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, State, The Supreme Court, the Punjab & Haryana High Court, Lahore High Court, High Court, the Government of India Act, Lahore High Court, the Gujarat High Court, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the Supreme Court, Letters Patent, Supreme Court, the High Court, Court, Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Criminal Court, Tribunal, Court, Court, Court, Court, inter alia, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Narain Das, the Allahabad High Court, Court, Court, a High Court, a High Court, a High Court, the Letters Patent, Division Bench, the High Court, Supreme Court, Letters Patent, Letters Patent of, inter alia, Division Bench, APO, ACO, ACO, Siddhartha Chattopadhyay

CARDINAL: No.3, 2013, two, 1, 1, 2, 4, 2, 15, 107, one, one, 108, one, one, 108, 81, 8 to 10, five, two, 1998(1, two, 85, 17, 1, 850, one, 131, 5, 1, 8, 10, 56, 1, 19, 1, 2, 1, 15, 340, 3, 15, 29, only one, three, one, No.3

GPE: LAXMI NARAYAN, Adv., Jayanta Samanta, Adv., Adv., Adv., Delhi, Gujarat, Bengal, Us, Meghesh, Subir, A.I.R., Subir, Haryana, Cr, P.C., Cr, P.C., Cr, P.C., Subir, Subir, Subir, Subir, Subir

PERSON: CHOWDHURY, Ratnanko Banerji, Sr Adv, Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, Sarosij Dasgupta, Ms Sutapa Mitra, Adv, Mainak Bose, Anurag Bagaria, Aniruddha Poddar, Adv, Adv, Kumar Ghosh, Prasar Bharati Broad Casting Corporation, Nath De v. Murari Mohan De, Murari Mohan, Bench, Vinita M. Khanolkar, Vinita M Khanolkar, Bench, Murari Mohan, Basu, ”.9, SCC672(P. S. Sathappan, Kumar Sadhukhan, Narain Das, Lal v., Kumar Ghosh, Swarup Sing, Jaiswal v. Semjeet Singh Brar, Kumar Ghosh, Kishan Fauji v. State, Haryana, Lokayukta, jurisdiction).”.20, Ram Kishan Fauji:“56, T. V. Eachara Warrier, Narain Das, P. S. Sathappan, Kumar Ghosh, Pashupati Nath De, P. S. Sathappan, Kumar Ghosh, Kumar Ghosh, Kumar Ghosh, Ram Kishan Fauji, Kumar Ghosh, Budhu Lal, Budhu Lal, Budhu Lal, Ram Kishan, Sanjib Banerjee

PRODUCT: Bench, a Full Bench, a Full Bench

EVENT: Clause 15, Clause 15, Clause 15, Clause 10, Clause 15

FAC: Fort William, the Single Bench, the Single Bench, Pashupati Nath De, the Single Bench, Pashupati Nath De, Shambu Nath Sadhukhan

ORDINAL: first, first, first, second

QUANTITY: 3 CHN743(Subir

LOC: Single Judge