Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Hari S/O Shankar Patil and Others Vs. the State of MaharashtrA. Through the Secretary to the Government, Co-operation Department and Others

Decided On : Mar-08-2013

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

LAW: Section 13B(1, section 13A, Section 13A, Section 13B, section 13B, Section 18, Section 43, Section 13A, Section 10 of the Act, the Companies Act, Section 29, section 25.” 10, Section 10, Section 29, Section 13A, Section 32B and 33(1

CARDINAL: 1, 34/2006, 28.12.2006, 476, 477, 479, 2, No.3, 11.10.2006, three, 33(1, 3, 4, 13B(1, 5, 6, 8), 5, 9, 11, 12, 32B and 33(1, one thousand and five hundred, five thousand, 33(1, 13, 14

DATE: 20th June, 2007, 17.6.2004, Nos.475, 1946, 13.10.2006, 28.12.2006, 16.12.2006, Section 13A, 13B, 1975, 1909, 1920, 1956, one year, less than two years, three months, 13th October, 2006

GPE: F.I.R., Cr, Nandurbar, Societies, Nasik, F.I.R., F.I.R.

PERSON: Taluka, Registrar, Registrar, Registrar, Explanation –

ORG: Shri Ratan Sajan Patil, Respondent no.5, The Bombay Money-Lenders Act, Respondent no.5, Respondent no.3, Respondent no.3, Respondent no.3, Divisional Joint Registrar, Respondent no.3, Respondent no.3, Respondent no.2, Departmental Enquiry against Respondent no.3, Learned Counsel, Respondent no.3, “[13A Power, Registrar, Registrar, State, Registrar, Respondent no.3, Act, FIR, Respondent no.3, the Bombay Money-Lenders, Court, –, a Court of Wards, the Provincial Insolvency Act, “29, Court, Court, –, Court, Court, Court, Respondent no.3, The First Information Reports

LOC: Respondent no.3, Respondent no.2, Respondent no.3

FAC: an Official Assignee

WORK_OF_ART: 32B Whoever, The Criminal Applications

ORDINAL: first, second

TIME: 32B or Section 33(1

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //