Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Nandkishor S/O Damodhar Wadgaonkar and Another Vs. Gajanan S/O Uttamrao Pede

Decided On : Aug-14-2013

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

LAW: Order IX Rule 9, the Code of Civil Procedure, Order IX Rule 9, Section 115, Section 115, section 115, Order IX Rule 9, Section 141, section 5 of Limitation Act, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, the Limitation Act, Article 226, Section 5, the Limitation Act, section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure

CARDINAL: 1, 2., 664/2007, 3., 9, 1, 4., 1, 5., 28.01.2011, 25.02.2009, two, three, Ten, 1, 9, one, 9, 141, 151, 151, 151, 141, 6., 4, 8, 9, 9, 1, 2, 8, 1, 9, 664/2007, 9, nos.7 to 11, 8., 9, 10, 11, 10, 11, 9, 14, 11, 12, 2, 689, 13, 4, 26, 7, 556, 14, 15, 16., 17

GPE: Spl, C.S., Spl, Spl, M.A.R.J.I., M.A.R.J.I., 08.08.1994, Spl, M.A.R.J.I., M.A.R.J.I., Spl, C.S., M.A.R.J.I., Karnataka, Kunhi, Karnataka, C.P.C., M.A.R.J.I., C.P.C., C.P.C., C.P.C., C.P.C., C.P.C., M.A.R.J.I., M.A.R.J.I., Mumbai, Mumbai, Spl, S.C., Spl, P.K.Ramachandranvs, Kerala

DATE: 12.01.2006, about 5 years, about 2 years, 25.02.2009, more than 5 years, 1238/2011, the year 2009, 1238/2011, more than one year, the year 2009, the year 2011, more than 5 years, 2003, today, 12.01.2006, 08.10.2012, 02.05.2013, 12.07.2013, 1238/2011, 1976, 1999, 1st July 2002, 1238, 2011, 5 years 9 months, 18 days, 2012, more than one year, 5 years 9 months, 18 days, 1238/2011, 1-2 years, the year 2007, more than 500 days, the year 2009, 1238/2011, 5 years 9 months, 18 days, the year 2007, 500-600 days, the year 2011, 5 years 9 months, 18 days, 1238/2011, PW No.2, the year 2007, more than 5 years 9 months, 18 days, 1006, more than 5 years 9 months, 18 days, 2009, 2011, 1997, 5 years 9 months, 18 days, 2011

PERSON: C.S. no.34/2007, C.S. No.34/2007, Suresh Waman Karmarkar, Spl, Y. Moideen, Lrs, Raosaheb Lasure, Gajanan, Rukhmini, Gajanan, Gajanan, Exh, No.43, Vilas, Exh, Vilas, no.12, R.B.Bhvaneshwari, Lrs

ORG: this Hon'ble Court, Hon'ble Court, Order IX Rule, Order IX Rule, Court, DarachandHarakchand Oswal, the 4th Joint Civil Judge, Rs.3,41,000/-, Special Civil Suit, the District Court, Acynotic Heart, Court, State, AIR 2009 SC 2577, Sub sec.(2, Order IX Rule, U/O IX R. 9, u/sec, U/sec, U/sec.151, u/sec, U/sec, Sec.141, ParighabaiLaxman Turakane, the High Court, Court, Order IX Rules, Court, Court, Court, Court, M.A.R.J.I. No.1238/2011, Special Civil Suit No.74/97, M.A.R.J.I. No, M.A.R.J.I. No.1238/2011, M.A.R.J.I. No, no.1, 4th Joint Civil, Exh.no.21, Aurangabad, PW No.3, nos.8, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1964 SC, Legislature, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, The Hon'ble Supreme Court, Lanka Venkateswarlu, A.P., L.J. 104, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, The Hon'ble Supreme Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Miscellaneous First Appeal, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Lanka Venkateswarlu, Order IX, Civil Revision Application, Registry, State, Bombay High Court

ORDINAL: 4th, first, second, Second, first, first, second, second, first, second, 4th

TIME: 9 of Code of, 9 of Code of

FAC: Tilaknagar, Sillod, Tq., the Rozanama of Spl, Bhailal Bhai

NORP: Dist, Rs.3,51,000/-

LOC: the District Judge

WORK_OF_ART: Rukmini Pede, PW 3 Dr.

PRODUCT: Order IX Rule, Order IX Rule, Revision

EVENT: Limitation Act

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //