Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Garware Marine Industries Limited Vs. Integrated Finance Co. Ltd.

Decided On : Aug-20-2013

Court : Mumbai

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: section 92, the Evidence Act, Section 28, the Indian Contract Act, Section 20(c, earlier Section 7 of Act 7 of 1888, Section 20(c, Section 20, the Arbitration Act, the Clause 13, the Arbitration Act, Section 41, the Arbitration Act, Section 28, the Contract Act, the Contract Act, Section 20(c, the Contract Act, Article 39, Article 43 of the Contract, Article 12 of the Contract, Article 12, ARTICLE 40, Article 39, Article 39, Article 39, Article 39, Article 39, the Explanation to Section 20 of the Code, Section 20 of the Code, Section 20, the Indian Companies Act, Section 28, the Contract Act, Section 20 of the Code, Section 20, the Explanation to Section 20 of the Code, the Explanation to Section 20 of the Code, Section 28, the Indian Contract Act, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 20, Section 20(a, the Indian Contract Act, Section 20, Section 20, Section 2(e, Section 9, Section 120 of Code of Civil Procedure 1908

ORG: Chennai, Plaintiff, Himson, Garware Nylons Limited, Chennai, Garware Nylon Ltd, Garware Nylon Limited, Company Petition No, Plaintiff, Garware Nylons Limited, Chamber, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, Plaintiff, Chennai, Chennai, CURRENCY, Finance Company Limited, Reliance, EXCLUSIONS, Reliance, the Equipment by Fire, Accident, Chamber, the Lease of the Equipment, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, M/s./ Garware Nylons Limited, Gareware Nylon Limited, Chennai Court, Chennai Court, the Supreme Court, ABC Laminart Pvt. Ltd., A.P. Agencies, Court, Tribunal, Court, Court, CPC, Court, Court, Co., Court, Court, Salem, CPC, Court, the Court at Salem, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Bombay, The Trial Court, The High Court, Bombay, Varanasi, Court, Court, Bombay, CPC, Court, CPC, CPC, Court, CPC, T.T. Elect, Supply Co., MANU/TN/0162/1975 :, Court, the Statute Mercantile Law, Court, the Courts of, Salem Chemical Industries, Bird, Calcutta, the Court at Calcutta, Court, CPC, Tamilnadu, the Special Leave Petition, Court, Court, Kaira, Salem, Court, the Supreme Court, RenusagarPower Co. Ltd., General Electric Company, Court, Union of India, Court, Union of India, Arbitration Clause, Court, Ruby General Insurance Co. Ltd., Contract, Contract, Contract, Monro v. Bognor Urban District Council, Shiva Jute Bailing Ltd., the Court of Appeal, Contract, Contract, the High Court, Contract, Contract, Pacific Refractories Ltd. Vs, Stein Heurtey India Projects Pvt Ltd., the Kerala High Court, The National Starch and Chemicals v. WeikfieldProducts Co., Poona, Poona, Poona, Poona, Poona, Poona, Poona, Court, Court, Court, Court, Vikalanga Sevaka Coop, Society Ltd., Sheth Brothers, Court, Court, Court, Trivandrum Sub Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Calcutta, Arbitration Clause, the Calcutta High Court, Calcutta High Court, Calcutta High Court, Indian Laws, Arbitration, The Calcutta High Court, the Calcutta High Court, the Calcutta High Court, the Calcutta High Court, Court, The Calcutta High Court, The Calcutta High Court, Courts, the Calcutta High Court, the Calcutta High Court, the Calcutta High Court, Clauses 5, Court, the Judgment of RenusagarPower Company Ltd., the Judgment of Calcutta High Court, GhewarchandRampuria Vs, Shiva Jute Bailing Ltd., Court, Pickford L.J. In, Bognor Urban District council, Court, Co., Ltd, C.W.N., Court, Reliance, Collis Removal Services, Court, the Court of Appeal, Collis Removal Service, the Judgment of court of, K.B. 167, request”., the Judgment of Queen's, Government of Gibraltar Vs, Darwins, Ltd., Court, Garware Nylons Ltd., the State Bank of Travancore Bombay, Garware Nylons Ltd., Court, Court, the Judgment of Supreme Court, M/s Patel Roadways Ltd., Bombay Vs, AIR 1992, Supreme Court, Court, Court, Bombay, the High Court, Court, Court, Bombay, Varanasi, the High Court, Court, Bombay, Explanation, Court, Globe Transport Corporation Triveni Engineering Works, Reliance, Bombay, Bombay, Explanation, Explanation, Explanation, Court, the Judgment of this Court, KotakMahindra Finance Ltd., Chennai, Court, Reliance, Court, the Judgment of Supreme, A.B.C. Laminart Pvt, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, “3, A.B.C. Laminart Pvt. Ltd., the Apex Court, Court, Court, Appeal, Appeal, Court, S.L.P., the Apex Court, The Apex Court, Laminart, The Apex Court, The Apex Court, Court, the Apex Court, Bench, the Apex Court, the C.P.C. The Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Bombay, The Apex Court, Court, Court, Appeal, the Madras High Court, the Apex Court, The Apex Court, Apex Court, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Explanation, the Apex Court, Corporation, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, Sections 23 and 28, Court, the High Court, Original Civil Jurisdiction, this High Court, Court, the Amended Letters Patent of this Court, Court, the Small Causes Court, the Bombay City Civil Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Court, Garware Nylons Ltd., the Judgment of Supreme Court, Patel Roadways, Supreme Court, Courts, the Judgment of Calcutta High Court, the Judgment of Queen's, Bench, Court of Appeal, Court, Kotak Mahindra Ltd., Judgment, Court, Court, Court, High Court, The Judgment of this Court, KotakMahindra Ltd., Chennai, Chennai, Garware Nylons, Chennai, Bank at Mumbai, Integrated Finance Company Limited, Chennai, Garware Nylons, Chennai, Chennai, Garware Nylons Ltd.

CARDINAL: 2., one, one, One, 5, 3, three, 31, 38, 30.11.1995, 39, two, 39, two, 163, 8, 13, 20, 22, 11, one, 9, 2, 11, 12, 13, 1, 2, 3, 14, 15, 16., one, 17, one, one, 1, two, 18, 12, 13, two, two, one, 23, 28, 20, 21, one, one, 2.10.1974, 12, two, 23, 28, 4, Four, 1, 2, 3., 4., 45, one, One, 1952]1SCR501, two, 231, 35 to 40, 6, 5, one, 6... 7, 37., 38, three, 40, 4, 16(1, 6, 4, 38, 38, 37, 568, 4, 7, 7, 4, 5, 6, 84, 52, 137, 179, one, 915, 3, 523, three, 524, 525, 526, one, one, 3, 26, 4, 1, 6 to 9, 5, two, two, two, 6., more than one, more than one, 7, two, 13, 1983)4SCC707. 8, two, two, two, two, 9, two, one, 5, 579, 3,4, 5, 3,4, 5, 11, 23, two, one, 3, two, 8, two, two, two, 4., 5, 20, 5, 17, 2,6, 16, two, one, two, one, two, 16, 7, 1, 2, 8, 31, three, 25

DATE: 30th June, 1992, the period of five years, the month of August, 1996, 1992, 19th June, 1997, 5th September, 1997, the month of October, 1997, 9th March, 1998, 9th March, 1998, 17th March, 1998, 18th December, 1998, 4th April, 1998, 29th April, 1998, 16th June, 1998, 30th June, 1998, 19th December, 1998, 6th January, 1999, 29th January 1999, 1st April, 1999, May, 1999, 31st January., 2001, 13.11.1995, 8th March, 2001, 30th April, 2001, quarterly, August, 2008, 28th January, 2009, 30th March, 1996, 30th November, 1995, 16, the year 2008, four months, more than 7 years, 1989, 9, 11, 12, 18, 1872, 1971]3SCR314, 1940, 22, 1984, 25, 45, 47, 1969]2SCR224, 46, this third, 47, 2006, 36, monthly, 39, 13, 1st April 1999, 1950, 29th October 1946, 1915, 1091, 36) 1949, 1948, 1948 1, 1956, 22, 1942, 1514, 2003, the year 1975, 1976, 16,, 17, 1996, 17, 1908, 30th June, 1992

GPE: Ahmednagar, Mumbai, p.a., Mumbai, Mumbai, India, Sri Rajendra Mills, WB/0064/1970, Salem, Salem, Salem, Salem, India, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Nanak Chand, Salem, Udyognagar, Gujarat, Udyognagar, Mohamadabad, Gujarat, Kaira, Salem, Salem, Salem, Kaira, Kaira, Ghewarehand, Rampuria, India, Trivandrum, Lowell, Bombay, Bombay, Bellary, Karnataka, A.I.R., Monrore, Bognor, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Counsel, India, India, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, India, B.C.R., Salem, Kaira, Great Britain, India, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, India, C.P.C., India, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Bombay, Bombay, Ahmednagar, Mumbai, Mumbai

PRODUCT: Rs.88,28,637/-, Rs.88,28,637/-, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, fromCalcutta, Judgment, Judgment, Judgment, Judgment, Para 24

ORDINAL: 5th, 7th, Thirdly, second, first, first, first, 1st, second, Secondly, second, first

PERCENT: 18%

NORP: Indian, Indian, Purchaser, Indian, Indian

PERSON: Lessee, Lessee, ¦, ¦.”, Lessee, Cheshire, Lee v. Showmen's, S. Manuel Raj, J. Manilal, Madras, HajiHassan MANU, Howrah, Hakam Singh v. Gammon, MANU, MANU, AIR1979Mad16, Mohmadabad, Kaira, Contract, Peary Lal, Kumar MANU, Renusagar, Kutty, Kutty, Poona, interalia, Kutty, Rajasthan, Kutty, Tulzapurkar, Cama, Cama, Cama, Cama, Cama, Cama, Cama, Cama, Paragraphs 4, A. I. R., Woolf, Asquith, Woolf, Cama, Cama, L.J. –, Cama, Kenny And Anr, ¦, Heyman, Cama, Cama, Cama, Cama, Paragraphs 5 to 9, Counsel, Madras, Hakam Singh v. Gammon, MANU, Anr, MANU, Counsel, Cama, Thoman Educational Tust, Cama, Lee v. Showmen's, Hakam Singh

WORK_OF_ART: “17, Guild Lord Denning, Salween Timber Construction (India, Applying Clause 12

LOC: Madras, Madras, Madras, Madras, Varanasi, Madras, Madras, Madras, Varanasi, Madras, Madras, Madras, Madras

FAC: Private International Law, Suramangalam Road Salem, Jourmull Parasram V. Louis Drefus, Madras, Madras

QUANTITY: 3 K. B. 167

EVENT: the C.P.C. Considering Section 120

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //