Subhash Hiralal Bhosale Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Decided On : Sep-04-2013

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Indian Penal Code, Indian Penal Code, Indian Penal Code, Rule 4, Indian Penal Code, section 376(2)(g, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, the Indian Penal Code, Rule 4, The Prisons Act, the Prisons Act, the Prisons Act, Act 27 of 1953, the Prisons Act, the NDPS Act, the Prisons Act, Rule 4, Rule 3, Rule 19, Rule 17, Rule 17, the Furlough Rules, Rule 19, Circular, Rule 19, Rule 19, Rule 19, Rule 19, the Full Bench, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Prisons Act, Article 20(2, the Prisons Act, Section 59, the Prisons Act, Section 3 of the Act, Rule 19, Rule 17, Rule 6, the Indian Penal Code, Foreigners Act, the Foreigners Act, Official Secrets Act

ORG: Dharmadhikari, the Competent Authority, Hinjewadi Police Station, the Sessions Court, Pune, Court, the Competent Authority, Pune, Additional Commissioner of Police, Advocate General, Legislative, Advocate General, the Home Department, the District Magistrate, the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, the Union Government, the Union Government, Legislature, Parliament, Gujarat High Court, the All India Jail Manual Committee, the Statement of Objects, the Jail Reforms Committee, Govt, the Inspector General of Prisons, the State of Bombay, Legislature, CL, SA, Bombay Act XXVII, S.48A, S.46, Home Department, Maharashtra State, Hinjewadi Police Station, Authority, Court, Legislature, Court, PralhadDnyanoba Gajbhiye v/s, The State of Maharashtra, Rule-3 of the Furlough Rules, the Jail Authorities, the Division Bench, the Gujarat High Court, Society, Society, Court, the Home Department of the State Government, Government, Court, the Division Bench, Sharad Keshav Mehta, Court, L.J. 226, ManjulabaiKisna Gulabe v/s State of Maharashtra, the Competent Authority, Maharashtra vide Notification No, PAR, A.P.P., State, the Government of Gujarat, the Judgment of the Apex Court, the Gujarat High Court, the Competent Authority, the Competent Authority, Manjulabai, the Competent Authority, the Gujarat High Court, The Competent Authority, the Competent Authority, RamchandraRaghu Naik v/s State of, Court, Court, the Apex Court, Union of India, Sunil Kumar Sarkar, AIR 2001, the Furlough Rules, AIR 2006 SC 2471, State of Maharashtra v/s, the Honourable Supreme Court, the High Court, Clauses, the State of Maharashtra, All India Jail Manual Committee, the Commissioner of Police, the District Magistrate, inter alia, the Sanctioning Authority, the Sanctioning Authority, the District Magistrate, Superintendent of Police, Amravati, Sections, the Competent Authority, the High Court, The High Court, The High Court, District Magistrate and/or, the Supreme Court, State, the Supreme Court, TADA, Haryana High Court, The High Court, the State Government, The State of Punjab, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the State Government, Maru Ram, v. Union of India, Court, Parliament, Delhi Administration and Ors, AIR 1978SC 1675, Court, Court, IPC, the State Government, State, Sections 121, IPC, State, State, State, the Honourable Supreme Court, the Gujarat High Court

CARDINAL: 2, 3, 366, 342, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, ten, two, 9, two, 10, 11, 12, 13, 366, 342, 506, 4(4, 4(6, 13, 14, 15, 4, 1, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 16, 136, 101, 27, 15, 16, 28, 5A, 5B, 5, One, 2, 3, 4, 17, 18, 10, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 17, 19, 13, 24, 25, 2004(1, 453, four, 13, 4, 26, two, 19, 7, 17, 8, 1990(3, 681, 9, 27, 3, 19, 19, 21-11-1989, 31-12-1968, 15, three, 16, 28, 12, 13, two, two, 29, 4(4, 6, 5, 28, two, 4(4, 6, 20, 6, 8, 6, 2, 376and 354, 6, 30, 31, 32, 3, 394, 1, 13, 121, 130, 130, 33, 34, 21, 13, 35, 36

PERSON: Prisons, M.M.Najmi, Najmi, Najmi, Najmi, Najmi, Najmi, Najmi, Rule 4(1, Rule 4, Rickshaw Driver, Parole, Najmi, Bhikhabhai Devshi Vs, Model Prison Manual, Reasons, xx xx xx xx, Cls, Supdt, Najmi, Najmi, Najmi, B.C.R., Bhikhabhai Devshi v. State, Rule, Sharad Keshav Mehta v. State, L.J. 681, Sharad Bhiku Marchande v. State, Sharad Keshav Mehta v. State of, ¦, Prisoner, L.J. 933, Rule, Pandurang Darvakar, Model Prison Manual, ¦, Jai Singh, Haryana, Mohinder Singh, Anr, Art, Articles 14, Najmi

DATE: 1959, 2010, April 2010, 120(B, 21st October, 16th April 2012, 30th October 2012, 29th March 2012, 1959, 1959, 10 years, February 2012, 120B, 23rd February 2012, 2012, 1959, 1985, 61 of 1985, twelve months, 1987, 1953, 1894, 1894, 1894, 1953, 2010, 2007, February 2012, 16th April 2012, 61 of 1985, 12 months, 18, 1994, 1987, L.J. 1932, 1894, 1989, 1991, 1989, 1989, 1959, 2002, 14, 1959, a period of, 4 weeks, 2 weeks, 165/02, two weeks, four weeks, 2005(3, one year, 1092, 1959, 1894, 1971, 1860, seven years, 18.07.2005. 9, 2003, 1696, 14 years, 2000, 1981, 1196, 14, 14 years

PRODUCT: No.1, the Full Bench of, The Full Bench, the Full Bench, Parole, Cri LJ 681, Notifications, Parole, Parole, Parole, Rule 4(4

NORP: Sessions, Rules, Joint, Rules, Punjab

ORDINAL: 3rd, firstly, Thirdly, first, second, third, first, first

GPE: Pune City, Hinjewadi, Prisons, Gujarat, A.I.R., CL, C.R.No.87, Bombay, C.R., Gujarat, Cri, Cri, L.J., C.R., L.J., Bombay, Prisons, Bhikhabhai, Clause, Amravati, A.I.R., Art, Sunil Batra, India

LOC: Govt, Single, Greater Bombay, NDPS

WORK_OF_ART: S.48A: Punishment, SC, Open Prisons

FAC: Single Jude