Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. and Another Vs. M/S Datar Switchgear Limited and Others

Decided On : Oct-19-2013

Court : Mumbai

LAW: section 37, section 34, section 37, section 34, section 34, Section 11, section 34(2, the Notice of Motion, the Indian Contract Act, the Notice of Motion, the Notice of Motion, the Notice of Motion, Section 34, section 53 and 73, the Indian Contract Act, section 55, the Contract Act, Section 73, the Indian Contract Act, Section 53, Section 34(2)(iv, section 55, section 53, section 34, No 87, section 34, section 37, section 34, section 34, section 34, Section 34, section 34, section 34, This Notice of Motion, the Notice of Motion, section 34, This Notice of Motion, Section 34, Section 34, the Indian Contract Act, Section 34(2, section 34, section 37, section 9, section 34, section 16, section 17, section 34, section 37, section 34, section 37, section 34, section 34, section 37, Section 34(2, Section 39(1)(vi, the Arbitration Act, Section 34.” 1940 Act, section 39, Section 34(2)(b)(ii, Section 34, Section 34, Section 34, Order 41, Rule 11, Order 41, Rule 11, Order 42, Rule 1, Order 43, Chapter V, Clause, Article 226 of the Constitution, Indian Railways Act, Order 41, Rule 11, Order 41, Rule 11, Chapter V itself.” “8, Order 41, Rule 11, Order 41 Rule 31, Section 28 of the Act, Section 55, the Contract Act, section 34, section 39, the Contract Act, section 34, section 34, section 34, section 34, section 37, B-II, the Contract Act

PERSON: V.M. Kanade, R.S. Dalvi, Award, Award, Mrs R.S. Dalvi, J., Benches, Bilal Nazki, Bilal Nazki, Award, Award, Summonses, Ghodaskar, Bapat, Inamdar, Buch, T. P. Vijay, Jadhav, Kulkarni, Lohar, T. K. Patil, – Dhule, Deshpande, Karunan, Jalgaon, Pathak, Jalgaon, Sonarikar, Jalgaon, Bhonsale, Kannawar, Mangulkar, – Nanded, Kaulwar, – Nanded, Pandilwar, – Nanded, Makkitoya, Kanjalkar, Karanjikar, Dixit, – Nanded, Shaikh Murtaza, Dhampalwar, Rasool, Kaveeshwar, Award, Rai, Award, Award, Mhase, J., Award, Award, Award, Vikas Singh, Award, Award, Award, Mhase, J., R.S. Dalvi, J., Shankar K. Mandal, JagvirSingh, Delhi Admn, Palitana Sugar Mill, Ramdas Shrinivas Nayak, Ramdas, Award, R.S. Dalvi, Rai, Rai, Award, McDermotvs, Burn Standard, Rai, Award, Dada, Counsels, D.K. Deshmukh, R.S. Dalvi, Bilal Nazki, Bilal Nazki, J., R.S. Dalvi, Bilal Nazki, J., R.S., D.K. Deshmukh, Bilal Nazki, Award, D.K. Deshmukh, Bilal Nazki, Mrs R.S. Dalvi, Mrs R.S. Dalvi, J., D.K. Deshmukh, J., D.K. Deshmukh, R.S. Dalvi, Jalgaon Circle, Mrs R.S. Dalvi, Bilal Nazki, Appellants, McDermotvs, Burn Standard, O.P. Malhotra, Award, Award, Award, Award, Award, Award, Award, Mohammed Mamdouh Matwally Ghali, Kerala, Anr, G. Mahanandi, Lrs, A. Ramalingam, Scoot Wilson, Madras, G. Ramcachndra Reddy, Satinderpal Singh Anand, Sharanpal Balmukund, McDermotvs, R.S. Sharma, Award, Award, Award, Scoot Wilson, G. Ramcachndra Reddy, Mohammed Mamdouh, Kerala, O.P. Malhotra, O.P. Malhotra, Anr, G. Mahanandi, ¦, Sabhyasachi Mukherjee, Lrs, A. Ramalingam, L.R., Award, Award, Mathew, Officers, Award, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, Claim, Award, “53, LTLMS, Work Order, ¦ Kolhapur Zone, ¦ Nasik Zone, ¦ Aurangabad Zone, Kolhapur Zone, Datar, Kolhapur Zone, Work Order, Ghodaskar, Lohar –, Kawlekar – Witness, Dixit – Witness, Bhonsale – Witness, P.K. Patil – Witness, Kolhapur, Nasik

CARDINAL: 1, 2, more than couple, one, 3, 4., 5, 34, 37, one, 34, 1996?11Submissions, 6, 9130, 23,760, 11,760, 12,555, 47,987, about 11,760, 12,555, 23,672, 11,760, 23,672, 27/3/1997, 47,987, 8, 9, 17,294, 10, 26, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8), 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 12, 185,97,86,399/-, 13, 14, 15, 87, 10, 91, 16, 10, 10, 91, 5, 705, 11, 34(2)(b)(i, 17, 10, 10, 91, 10, 10, 73, 1, 9, 2, 5, 3, 2, 4, 2, 4, 2, 18, two, 91, 11, 12, 53 and 73, 5, 11, 181, 5, 11, 91, 39, 90, 39, 91, 73, 90, two, 21, 22, 23, 24, two, 26, 27, 28, 461, 30, 34, 37, 34, 37, 5, 11, 61 to 65, 5, 705, 31, 62, 1174.]”, 55 and 73, 13, 21, four, 31, 34, 37, 1)An, 2.Appeal, 2, 3, 3, 39(1)(iv, 1, 3, 283, 2, 418, 3, 5, 6, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 30, 45 to 62, 7, 21, 1, 19, two, two, 7, 396, 3, 283, 26, 1194, 14, 7, 2, 17, 4, 20, 21, 13, 434, 30, 109, 4, 32, one, 33, 17,294, 34, 35, 36, 6.00, 6.2, 14/7/1997, 6.3, more than 120, 6.4 to 6.12, 7, 7.1, 7 to 20, 10.1, 10.4, 11.1, 12.1, 12.2, 37, 5, 6, 21, 38, 9, two, 1999”, seven, 17,294, 39, two, 13, as many as 14,206, 23, two, 9, 11, 5.2, 5.3, 16, 5.1, 22, 23, 41, 42., two, one, 43, 47,987, 5.2, 5.3, 12, one, 5.1, 5.2, three, 5.2, 5.2, 47, 5.3, as many as 120, 5.2, two, 27/3/1997, 48, three, one, two, 17,294, 50, 31/3/1999, 5.0, 27/3/1997, 5.1, four, 63, one, 2, two, 51, 19/2/199, 17, 14/6/1997, more than 10,000, one

ORG: The Appellant – Maharashtra State Electricity Board, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, “the, Single Judge, Coram, the Arbitral Tribunal, Datar Switchgear Ltd, the Apex Court, DSL, the Arbitral Tribunal, MSEB, Arbitration Petition, Coram, D.K. Deshmukh, the Arbitral Award, DSL, the Division Bench, DSL, DSL, Arbitration Petition, the Arbitral Award, the Apex Court, the Arbitration Petition, Board, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Apex Court, K.R. Shriram, Notices of Motion, DSL, Chamber Summonses, Apex Court, SLP, MSEB, the Division Bench, Court, Motion No.461, Court, Point No.(i, the Arbitral Tribunal, MSEB, DTC, Point, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Public Policy, the State Government, the Electricity (Supply) Act, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd, DSL, Electronic Load Management Systems, Tension Switched Capacitors (LTSC, Distribution Transformer Centres, DTC, Board, MSEB, LTSC, 3425 Capacitors, DSL, Load Management System, L.M. System, LTSC, this Letter of Intent, Tender No, DSL, the Letter of Intent, Board, DSL, a Letter of Credit, Letter of Credit, the Letter of Credit, DSL, Arbitration, DSL, Court, DSL, – Head Office, Superintending Engineer – Head Office, Sub-Engineer - Nanded, Superintending Engineer - Sangli.”, The Arbitral Tribunal, Court, Emphasis, MSEB, Bench, the Division Bench, Notice of Motion, MSEB, MSEB, the Arbitration Petition, Reliance, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., Saw Pipes, Burn Standard Co., the Apex Court, Arbitration Petition, Court, MSEB, Bench, Notice of Motion, Single Judge, Coram, Court, The Section of Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, Court, the Learned Tribunal, Court, No.1554, Notice of Motion, the Notice of Motion, Court, State of Bihar and Others, Bhavnagar University, Maharashtra, The Apex Court, Court, Court, Court, Tribunal, Single Judge, Coram, the Learned Arbitrators', Emphasis, the Learned Arbitrators, Delhi Development Authority Vs, R.S. Sharma, Scale 663 @ 672, Arbitral Awards, Dermott International INC, Burn Standard Co. Ltd., Emphasis, ONGC, Counsel for DSL, the Learned Arbitrators, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Reliance, DSL, the Arbitral Award, J., Division Bench, the Chamber Summonses and Notices of Motion, Apex Court, SLP, MSEB, the Division Bench, Court, Apex Court, the Arbitral Award, Single Judge, Coram, D.K. Deshmukh, Petition, DSL, Bench, D.K. Deshmukh, J., MSEB, SLP, DSL, the Apex Court, SLP, Arbitration Petition, SLP, the Apex Court, Apex Court, SLP, the Apex Court, Arbitration, the Appellate Court, Court, Division Bench, Arbitration Petition, the Apex Court, DSL, the Apex Court, SLP, the Apex Court, Bench, J., the Appeal Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, J., Bench, J., the Supreme Court, MSEB, The Apex Court, SLP, Heard Learned Senior Counsel, the High Court of Judicature, the High Court, the High Court, Arbitration Petition, the High Court, Appellate, SLP, the Apex Court, Court, the Apex Court, J., Apex Court, D.K. Deshmukh, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Appellate Court, MSEB, Arbitrators, Appellant, the Arbitral Tribunal, Arbitrators, Respondents, Arbitrators, Arbitrators, Arbitrators, DSL, Arbitrators, MSEB, DTC, DSL, DTC, DSL, DSL, the Petition and Appeal, MSEB, Arbitrators, DSL, The Arbitral Award, Petition, The Apex Court, Bench, J., the Apex Court, Plaintiff, the Arbitral Award, DSL, Notice of Motion No.3227, “public, Court, Court, the Arbitral Award, Court, the Arbitral Award, The Apex Court, ONGC Ltd., Saw Pipes Ltd., Court, the Apex Court, ONGC Ltd. Vs, Saw Pipes Ltd., Court, Court, ONGC, Bench, Court, ONGC, the Apex Court, Delhi Development Authority, R.S. Sharma and Co., the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, “public, India”, The Apex Court, Court, Court, Court, Supreme, the Arbitral Award, the Appellate Court, DSL, the High Court, Arbitrators, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Appeal Court, Court, Court, Tribunal, MSEB, Kerala Automobiles Ltd., Andhra Pradesh Co-, Wool Spinning Mills Limited, AIR 2003 AP, Anup Kumar Biswas, Babul Kumar Biswas, ONGC Limited, Garware Shipping Corporation, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Batliboy Environmental Engineers, DSL, BPDP, Engineering Constructions Corporation, Ravindra and Associates, Union of India4 (, Union of India, another5, Kalinga Construction Co., The Apex Court, the Appeal Court, Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Delhi Development Authority, Court, the Apex Court, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, BPDP, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Apex Court, Union of India, Court, Court, Court, U.P., Allied Constructions, Court, Kerala High Court, Kerala Automobiles Ltd., Kerala High Court, Arbitrators, ONGC, Andhra Pradesh High Court, Andhra Pradesh Co-, Wool Spinning Mills Limited, AIR 2003 AP, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, State, Calcutta High Court, AnupKumar Biswas, Babul Kumar Biswas, the Calcutta High Court, CPC, CPC, CPC, the Appellate Side Rules, Workmens' Compensation act, CPC, CPC, CPC, the Apex Court, H. Siddiqui (Dead, the Apex Court, ONGC Limited, Garware Shipping Corporation Limited, Division, Reliance, the Judgment of this Court, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Batliboy Environmental Engineers Ltd, Arbitral Tribunal, the Apex Court, High Courts, the Arbitral Tribunal, MSEB, the Arbitral Tribunal:-, the Arbitral Tribunal, MSEB, DTC, Claimants, Point, the Arbitral Tribunal, MSEB, DTC, Tribunal, DTC Lists, DSL, DSL, DSL, DTC Lists, Tribunal, Letter of Credit, DSL, DSL, MSEB, DTC, Zones, DTC Lists, DTC Lists, Claimants, the Arbitral Tribunal, DTC Lists, Court, Respondents, DTC, Respondents, DSL, DSL, MSEB, Zonal Office, Claimants, DTC, DTC, DTC, DTC, DSL, Respondents, DTC Lists, DTC, DSL, the Written Statement, DSL, Respondents, the Written Statement, Claimants, DTC, DTC, Claimants, Claimants, DTC, the Written Statement, DTC, Head Office, Claimants, DTC Lists, Schedules B-I and B-II, Claimants, DTC Lists, the Written Statement, DTC Lists, DTC Lists, the Arbitral Tribunal, The Arbitral Tribunal, Claimants, DTC, Claimants, Emphasis, Tribunal, Claimants, Respondents, Claimants, Respondents, Respondents, counts.(E), Claimants, Tribunal, Datar, Claimants, Claimants, DSL, Rs.163,08,02,950/-, Claimants, Tribunal, Claimants, Respondents, DTC, Claimants, Claimants, Claimants, Claimants, Datar, Claimants, Tribunal, DTC Lists, Tribunal, DTC, Claimants, Claimants, Respondents, the Superintending Engineers, the Head Office, Head Office, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Written Statement, DTC, Tribunal, the Arbitration Petition, Arbitration Petition, Arbitration Petition, DTC, Court, Learned, Clauses 5.1, DTC, Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Learned Arbitrators, the Learned Arbitrators, Tribunal, Single Judge, Coram, MSEB, DTC, The Arbitral Tribunal, Claimants/DSL, DTC, Tribunal, Lists, DTC, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, MSEB, DSL, Clauses 5.1, L.M., Letter of Credit, DTC, “5.2, L.M. Systems, L.M, The Superintending Engineer, Distribution Transformer Centres, L.M. Systems, Superintending Engineer of O and M Circle, the L.M. Systems, the Superintending Engineer of the circle Office, Superintending Engineer Circle Office, Superintending Engineer, Superintending Engineer, the L.M. Systems, L.M., Letter of Credit, 21/4/1997.The Letter of Credit, DTC, LTLMS, Circle Offices, Letter of Credit, DTC, DSL, Arbitral Tribunal, DSL, Zones, Aurangabad, DTC, DSL, Circle Engineer, Board, the Chief Engineer's, Zones, Zones, Court, Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, DTC, Respondents/Claimants, Tribunal, Claimants, Respondents, Claimants, Claimants, Respondents, Claimants, Claimants, Tribunal, DTC Lists, Tribunal, DSL, Letter of Credit, Reliance, Tribunal, the Letter of Credit, Tribunal, DSL, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, DSL, Letter of Credit, MSEB, DTC, Zones, DSL, Mathew of DSL, Reliance, DSL, Datar, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Mathew, Tribunal, the Work Order, the Head Office of the Respondents/MSEB, Tribunal, Schedules, Zones, DTC Lists, the Work Order, MSEB, DTC, DSL, DTC, Certificate, DSL, the Tribunal in the Award, DTC Lists, DSL, DTC, Nasik, Kolhapur and Aurangabad, DSL, DSL, Superintending Engineers, DTC, Claimants

DATE: 1996, 18/3/2009, 18/06/2004, 18/06/2004, 18/3/2009, April, May, 2013, daily, 24/6/2013, 8/8/2013., 2010.6Scope, 1996, 1948, 1994, 1948, 30/9/1993, 30/9/1994, six years, June, 1996, a period of, 10 years, 15/7/1996, 15/1/1997, the year 1993 and, 1994, 24/1/1997, 18/2/1997, 15/1/1997, 1993, 1994, June, 1996, 18/2/1997, each financial year, every year, the end of financial year, 19/2/1999, December, 1998, 10 years, 13/4/1999, 21/4/1999, 1273,70,26,669/-. 11, 21, 1,00,00,0000/-, 2009, 90, 90, 91, 90, 2003, 2006, 90, 91, 30/4/2009, 90, 18.03.2009, 90, 2009, 30/4/2009, 2003, 9 to 12, 2007, 2003, 61, 1982, 1982, 89, 2008, 2003, 2006, 2003, 2006, Para 65, 1996.” 19, J. 20, 25/8/2009, 2009, 18/3/2009, 18/3/2009, 22nd of October, 2008, 2005, August, 2005, 2004, 1996, the 1st, 2010 25, 24/6/1998, the very next day, 2004, 2009, 2010 29, 2010, 2003, 31, 2006, Para 65, 2003, 2008, 1996, under:- 37, 1940, 2011, 2004(1)ARBLR 183(Cal, under 1996 Act, 21, 1996, 1940, 1940, 2003, 2011, 27, Section 34(2)(a, 2004(1)ARBLR 183(Cal)in, Rule 17, 1996, 2011, 33, 2007, para 9, 1996, July, 1998, December, 1998, 8/5/1997, 11.2, 10092, 149926, May, 1998, May, 1998, April 30, two years, 18/3/2009, 2004, 46, 46, 53, 27th March, 1997, 10 years, four months, twenty months, a period of, one month, 44, four months, 20 months, 24 months, 2/5/1997, 14/7/1997, 45, 20 months, 27/3/1997, 2/5/1997, 14/07/1997, 14/7/1997, the last date, two years, 14/7/1999, 46, December, 1998, 14/7/1997, 14/7/1997, 21/12/1998, 19/02/1999, 11/3/1999, 11/3/1999, 4/11/1997, 25/5/1998, 17/6/1998, 21/12/1998, 49, 19/2/1999, 19/2/1999, seven days, 7 days, 19/2/1999, four months, twenty months, 14/5/1997, 4/11/1997, 25/5/1998, 17/6/1998, 21/12/1998, 27/3/1997, 55, 11/3/1999, May 19, 1998, May 30, 1998, December 19, 1998, November, 1998, September 14, 1998, May 1998, September, 1998, April 1998, 20 months, 52, 21/12/1998

GPE: Act”, Kumbhakoni, 19/6/2013, MSEB, MSEB, Counsel, Counsel, MSEB, MSEB, Apex, the State of Maharashtra, New Delhi, MSEB, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single, Bombay, Appeal, Bombay, Single, Single, Single, MSEB, MSEB, MSEB, India, India, India, Renusagarcase, India, India, India, India, MSEB, Mumbai, Ranchi, India, Orissa, India, Ranchi, India, Act”, India, Clause, Apex, Mumbai, India, India, India, MSEB, Nasik Zone, Ground, Ground, Circles, MSEB, Kolhapur Zone, Nasik, MSEB, MSEB, MSEB, Nasik Zone, Nasik Zone, Kolhapur Zone, Nasik Zone, Kolhapur Zone, Nasik, MSEB, MSEB, Kolhapur Zone, Kolhapur Zone, Nasik Zone, Nasik Zone, Kolhapur Zone, Aurangabad, Kolhapur Zone, Nasik Zone, Nasik Zone, Nanded Circle, MSEB, MSEB

LOC: Single, Single, Petition, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single Judge, Respondent, Single Judge, Respondent, Single, Single, Single Judge, Single, Single Judge, Single Judge, Nanded Circle, Satara Circle

PRODUCT: Appellant, B-II, Mcdermotetc, judgments:-, Respondent, Appellant, Para 5, Lists, Lists, Lists, B-II, Award, Award, Lists, the Arbitrator's Award, B-II Lists, B-II, B-II Lists, B-II, B-II

ORDINAL: first, second, second, first, Firstly, second, Secondly, third, Secondly, 3rd, 2nd, first, Secondly, Thirdly, second, Thirdly, 4th, firstly, firstly, secondly, first, first, firstly, Secondly, second, firstly, first, first, 2nd, 3rd, first, Secondly, third, fourth, Firstly, secondly, second, first, Firstly, firstly, first, third, firstly, first

FAC: the Appellant – MSEB, Ground-II

WORK_OF_ART: Bench, 25/8/2009, Electricity (Supply) Act, Letter of Intent, 25/8/2009, The Law and Practice of Arbitration and Conciliation, 'The Law and Practice of Arbitration and Conciliation' (Second Edition

TIME: afternoon, 33 of 1940 Act, 17 of the minutes, the minutes, the minutes, minutes

NORP: Tender, Tender, Tender, Tender, Maharashtra, Tender, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Lists, Lists, Lists, Lists, Lists, Nasik, Lists, Lists, L.T, L.T, L.T, Lists, Lists, Lists, Lists, Rs.163, Lists

PERCENT: 10%, 90%

EVENT: 8/4/2009, the Notice of Motion, the Notice of Motion, Officers