Avm Capital Services Private Limited and Others

Decided On : Jul-12-2012

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the Companies Act, the Constitutional Bench, Section 391 – 394, the Companies Act, the Constitution Bench, the Constitution Bench, the Constitutional Bench, the Constitution Bench, Section 391-394, the Companies Act, Section 391-394, the Companies Act, Section 391-394, the Companies Act, Section 293(1)(a, the Companies Act, the Wealth Tax Act, the Wealth Tax Act, a Fairness Opinion of Fedex Securities Ltd, the Composite Scheme of Arrangement and Amalgamation

ORG: Court, Sections 80, Companies ‘AVM Capital Services Private Limited, ACPL, Chevy Capital Services Private Limited, PM Capital Services Private Limited, PCSPL, Pranit Trading Private Limited, Viramrut Trading Private Limited, VTPL, Unichem Laboratories Limited, the Transferee Company, Scheme, the Transferor Companies, the Transferee Company, the Transferor Companies, the Transferee Company, Scheme, the Transferee Company, Scheme, the Transferee Company, the Transferee Company, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, the Transferor Companies, Scheme, the Transferee Company, Scheme, the Transferee Company, the Honble Supreme Court, McDowell and Company Limited V/s. Commercial Tax, Judgment of Justice, the Gujarat High Court, Wood Polymer Limited, the Gujarat High Court, the Honble Supreme Court, Union of India, McDowells, the Authority for Advance Ruling, Groupe Industrial Marcel Dassault, AAR, the Supreme Court, McDowells, Court, the Transferee Company, the Transferor Companies, Petitioners, the Honble Supreme Court, VodaphoneInternational Holdings V/s. Union of India and Ors, the Honble Supreme Court, McDowells, the Judgment of Chinnappa Reddy, the Judgment of Justice, McDowells, the Honble Supreme Court, Vodaphone International Holdings (Supra, The Supreme Court, McDowells, McDowells, the Gujarat High Court, Wood Polymer Limited, the Honble Supreme Court, Vodaphone International Holdings (Supra, AAR, AAR, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, AAR, Court, Court, the Income Tax Authority, the Transferee Company, the Income Tax Authority, Court, JindalIron, Steel Company Limited, the Transferor Companies, the Transferee Company, Scheme, Transferor Companies, the Transferee Company, the Transferee Company, Scheme, the Transferee Company, the Transferee Company, the Transferee Company, Scheme, Petitioners, Scheme, the Transferee Company, Petitioners, the Transferor Companies, the Transferee Company, the Transferee Company, the Transferee Company, the Transferor Companies, the Transferee Company, the Transferee Company, Scheme, the Transferee Company, Petitioners, Scheme of Arrangement, Tata Services Limited and Tatanet services Limited (Company Petition No.758 of 2005, Company Application, the Scheme of Arrangement between BalkrishnaIndustries Limited, Balkrishna Paper Mills Limited, Balkrishna Synthetics Limited (Company Petition No.713 of 2007, Company Application No.771 of, Petitioners, Scheme, the Supreme Court, McDowells, McDowell, the Privy Council, IRC, the House of Lords, Craven, the Gujarat High Court, McDowell, Court, ITR, Court, Tribunal, McDowell, McDowell, the Honble Supreme Court, McDowells, Court, McDowell, CIT v. Raman and Co., AIR 1948 SC 49)based, “we, Shah, McDowells, McDowell, Court, McDowell, AC, The Hon'ble Supreme Court, McDowell, Duke of Westminster, AC 1, McDowell, CIT v/ A.Raman and Co., AIR 1968, AC 395, “We, the British Courts, Shah, Judges of, McDowell (SCC PP254-55, McDowell, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the State of Madhya Pradesh, Bank of Chettinad Ltd., CIT, the Supreme Court, The Honble Supreme Court, Vodaphone International Holdings, Mcdowells, McDowell and Co. Ltd., McDowell and Co. Ltd., J., McDowell and Co. Ltd., Mathuram Agarwal V State of Madhya Pradesh, The Honble Supreme Court, McDowell and Co. Ltd., McDowell and Co. Ltd., Mathuram Agarwal, McDowell and Co. Ltd., J., Reddy, Reddy, J., McDowell, McDowell, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Vodaphone, McDowell, McDowells, the Gujarat High Court, Wood Polymer Limited, the Supreme Court, Vodaphone International Holdings, Petitioners, the Transferor Company, Court, The Wood Polymer Limited, the Gujarat High Court, the Wood Polymer Limited, The Gujarat High Court, AAR, McDowell, Vodaphone International Holdings, Court, Court, Jindal Iron and Steel, The Judgment of the Division Bench, this High Court, Sterlite Industries, the Transferee Company, the Transferor Companies, Petitioners, the Transferee Company, Tata Services Limited and Tatanet services Limited, Tata Services Limited, Petitioners, Court, the Scheme of Arrangement, Balkrishna Industries Limited, the Transferee Company, Transferor Companies, the Transferor Companies, the Transferee Company, the Transferee Company, the Transferor Companies, Scheme, the Transferee Company, the Transferee Company, the Transferee Company, Scheme, Scheme, the Transferee Company, the Transferee Company, Scheme, the Transferee Company, Scheme, Scheme, Court, the Boards of the Transferor Companies, the Transferee Company, the Transferee Company, the Transferor Companies, the Transferee Company, Court, The Transferor Companies, the Transferee Company, Scheme, Court, Court, Scheme, Scheme, Exhibit N, the Company Scheme Petition No.675, the Transferee Company, Court, Scheme, the Transferee Company, Affidavit, the Transferee Company, the Transferee Company, Affidavit, Affidavit, Transferor Companies, the Transferee Company, Partner of N.A.Shah Associates, the Transferor Companies, the Transferee Company, the Transferor Companies, the Transferee Company, the Transferor Companies, the Transferee Company, the Transferee Company, the Transferee Company, the Transferee Company, the Transferee Company, Fairness Opinion, the Transferee Company, the Transferee Company, the Transferee Company, the Transferee Company, the Securities and Exchange Board of India, the Transferee Company, the Securities and Exchange Board of India, the National Stock Exchange, the Bombay Stock Exchange, Scheme, the Company Scheme Petition as Exhibit S1, the Transferor Companies, the Transferee Company, Scheme, the Transferee Company, Scheme, Auditors, Scheme, Affidavit, Scheme, Scheme, Company Scheme Petitions, Clauses, Registrar of Companies, Scheme

CARDINAL: 391, 394, 100, 103, five, 2, 750, 158, one, 157, 156, 46, 31, 3, 3, 154, 148, 47, 597, 4, 847, 5., 6., 341, 137, one, five, 8, 12, 9, one, 10, 149, 148, 149, 12, 259, 13, 14, 46, one, 395, 142, 19, 67, 11, 17, 142, 243, 17, 15, 8, 8, 522, 166, 57, 46, four, five, 18, 64, 64, 45, one, 18, 19, 147, 294, 20, 21, 113, 273, 22, one, 23, five, 24, 25, 21.1, 26, 535, one, 27, 4, 9, 28, four, five, 29, 30, 31, 595, 596, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37., 10,000/-, 671, 672, 673, 674, 10,000/-, 38, 39

DATE: 1956, November 3, 2011, 1977, 1977, 2004, 2009, 2012, 2004, 2004, 1956, 1975, 2005, 2007, 1935, 1926, 1936, 1968, 1926, 45, 1999, 1940, Para 154, the respondents”. 17, Para 46, 41-45, 1999, 45, 46, 7-10, 17, 1984, 1956, 1956, 1956, 1956, 1975, today, before 31st March, 2012, March 31, 2012, 01st May, 2012, May, 2012, May 31, 2012, 11th May, 2012, 12th May, 2012, May 31, 2012, 2011, 14th May, 2011, 26th March 2012, 1997, 2011, January 18, 2012, 17th February 2012, 60 days, 30 days, 2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, four weeks

PERSON: Shailesh Mehta, Prakash Modi, Mody, Chinnappa Reddy, J., Anr, Anr, Azadi Bachao Andolan, Azadi Bachao Andolan, Azadi Bachao Andolan, Ranganath Mishra, Chinnappa Reddy, J., Chinnappa Reddy, Bachao Andolan, Azadi Bachao Andolan, Chinnappa Reddy, Bachao Andolan, Prakash Modi, Prakash Modi, Prakash Modi, Azadi Bachao Andolan, Paragraphs 147, Challenge Corpn, Berry v. CIT, Grace, the Duke of Westminster, Chinnappa Reddy, J., J., J., Ranganath Mishra, Chinnappa Reddy, J., Azadi Bachao Andolan, Chinappa Reddy, J., Paragraphs 141, Chinnappa Reddy, J., J., J., Ranganath Mishra, Chinnappa Reddy, Chinnappa Reddy, J., Ranganath Mishra, Azadi Bachao, Russel, Killowen, Russell Vs, Bachao, Bachao Andolan, Bachao Andolan, Chinnappa Reddy, J., Westminster, Azadi Bachao Andolan, Chinnappa Reddy, J., Azadi Bachao Andolan, Azadi Bachao Andolan, methods”., Chinnappa Reddy, Reddy, J., liability”, Chinnappa Reddy, Reading McDowell, Azadi Bachao, Bachao Andolan, Azadi Bachao Andolan, Bachao Andolan, K.Subharaman, K.Subharaman, Jayendra Natwarlal Shah, Prakash Modi, Milan Modi, Jayendra Shah, Jayendra Shah, Shailesh Mehta

PERCENT: 0.001%, 98.74%, 99.99%, 0.63%, 0.001%, 99.99%, over 15%, 0.001%

ORDINAL: first, 9th, second

PRODUCT: Promoters, Comp, Promoters, Judgment, Judgment, Report, Promoters, Promoters, Report

LOC: Single, Affidavit

WORK_OF_ART: 10 SCC 1, Scheme, Mathuram Agarwal Vs, 8 SCC, Comp Cases, Scheme of Arrangement, Scheme, Scheme, Trademark or Patent, Scheme, Superintendent of Stamps

GPE: Aazadi, M.V.Valliappan, Banyan, J.C.Shah, Westminster, Westminster, Fisher, England, J.C.Shah, Westminster, Westminster, England, India, Misra, Westminster, Ambalal, Ld, Scheme, Rejoinder, O.S., Bombay, Bombay, O.S., Bombay

NORP: Promoter, Petitioners, British, Company, Company, Trademark

FAC: the Board Meeting

EVENT: the Listing Agreement, the Listing Agreement, Regulation 3(1)(i