Jsw Ispat Steel Limited Vs. Jeumont Electric and Another

Decided On : Sep-14-2012

Court : Mumbai

LAW: section 8, section 45, section 45, section 16, section 5, section 5, the Companies Act, section 9, section 9, section 11(6, Section 2(h, Section 2(b, Section 7, Section 7, Section 7, the Companies Act, the Constitution Bench, the Constitution Bench, section 16, Section 16, Section 8 or 11, Section 16, Section 11(7, Section 16, Section 11, Section 16, Section 11(7, Section 11(6, Section 11(6, Section 11(7, Section 11(6, Article 136 of the Constitution of India, Article 136 of the Constitution, Article 32 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 16, Section 7 of the Act, Section 11(6, Section 11(6, section 16, section 16, Section 11(8, Section 37 of the Act, Section 34 of the Act, Section 11(6, Section 16 of the Act, section 37, section 16 of the Act

CARDINAL: No.1, No.1, No.1, 2, No.2, No.2, two, No.2, No.2, No.2, No.2, No.2, 005, 791, 8, 5, 531, 2, 6, 2, 3, 2, 681, 3, 450, 2, 5, 16, 127, 565, 4, two, two, 5., 6., one, 8, 7, 9, 615, 400 059, 1, 1, 2, 10, 11, No.2, 1.1, 71-75, 400, 1.2, 1.4, 1.7 “Parties”, 1.8 “Party”, 28.1, 15, 28.2.1, 28.2.2, 28.2.3 …, 3, three, two, two, 28.2.7, 12, No.2, three, two, 28.2.8, 13, No.2, No.2, No.2, 14, No.2, 110, No.2, No.1, No.2, No.2, No.2, 15, three, 2, three, 2, 3, 4, one, 11, two, 1, 372, 1098:2009, 261.”, two, two, two, one, 16, 11, 16, No.1, No.2, No.2, No.2, 17, 5, 16, 18, 24, one, 11, 19, 6, 9, 20, 21, 6, 7, 22, 23, No.2, 24, No.2

ORG: No.4600006177, the International Chamber of Commerce, Power Project, the Apex Court, IndowindEnergy Ltd., AIR 2010, Court, Nagpur High Court, Tarabaiv, AIR 1932 Nagpur 114, Division Bench, Court, HarshadRatilal, the Apex Court, DLF Universal Ltd., Court, the Apex Court, S.B.P, Company, National Insurance Co.Ltd., Boghara Polyfab Pvt.Ltd., AIR 2009 SC 170, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Court, Apex Court, AIR 2000, SukanyaHoldings, Court, Ivory Properties, Hotels Pvt.Ltd., Nusli Neville Wadia, Onyx Musicabsolute.com Pvt, Delhi High Court, Reminiscent India Television Ltd., ARBLR 361, the Apex Court, ModiEntertainment Network v., AIR 2003 SC, Court, Court, Shree Precoated Steels Ltd., Macsteel International Far East Ltd., the Apex Court, Delhi Development Authority v. Skiper Construction Company, AIR 1966, KvarenerCemevatation India Ltd., Bajrangalal Agarwal, SC, Co., AIR 2006 SC, Shree Subhlaxmi Fabrics Pvt, UC 807, SandipIndustries, L.J. 313, the International Arbitration, Court, Apex Court, Bulk Trading S.A., AIR 2002, Venture Global Engineering, Satyam Computer Service Ltd., AIR 2008, the Delhi High Court, AitreyaLtd, Dans Energy Pvt.Ltd., Court, the International Arbitrator, Court, Court, the Apex Court, DLF Universal Ltd., the Apex Court, Court, The Apex Court, RameshChand Ardawatiya, The Apex Court, SopanSukhdeo Sable, Asstt, Court, Court, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Jeumont Electric India Pvt. Ltd., 6th Floor, Bonanza, Andheri East, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, this Hon'ble Court, this Hon'ble Court, this Hon'ble Court, Defendant No.1, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, this Hon'ble Court, this Hon'ble Court, this Hon'ble Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, Court, Court, Contract, Ispat Energy Limited, Registered, “Contractor/Contractors”, Jeumont Industries, Owner, Owner, Contract, Owner, Owner, Party, Party, Dispute, Dispute, Owner, Dispute, Dispute, Dispute, Party, Party, Arbitration Rules, the Swiss Federal Court of Obligations, Appointing Authority, Agreement, Owner and Contractor, Owner, Dispute, the International Chamber of Commerce, MW Power Plant, arbitration”., the Apex Court, IndowindEnergy Ltd., Wind Electric Generators, Subuthi Finance Ltd., Indowinde Energy Ltd., Wescare, Subuthi, RCI Power, the “seller/Wescare”., Subuthi Finance Ltd, Indowind Energy, Wescare, Subuthi, Wescare, Wescare, Subuthi, Wescare, Subuthi, the Apex Court, The Apex Court, Inspiration Clothes, U and Ors, AIR 2009, SC, Apex Court, Subuthi, Board of Directors, Subuthi, Subuthi, Indowind a party, Subuthi, Subuthi, Board of Directors/, Wescare, Subuthi, the Board of Directors of Wescare, Subuthi, the Board of Directors, un, The Apex Court, Madras High Court, Subuthi, the Apex Court, The Apex Court, Apex Court, Subuthi, Subuthi, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, IndowindEnergy Ltd., Court, the Apex Court, Court, the Apex Court, KvarenerCemevatation India Ltd., Bajrangalal Agarwal, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Arbitrator, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, IndowindEnergy Ltd., the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Co., Tribunal, Sections, KonkanRailway, Act, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, Court, Court, the Chief Justice, Act, The Apex Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the Apex Court, Shree Subhlaxmi Fabrics Pvt, the Hindustan Chamber of Commerce, SandipIndustries, the Division Bench, the Apex Court, Bulk Trading S.A., the Apex Court, Venture Global Engineering, Satyam Computer Service Ltd., the Delhi High Court, AitreyaLtd, Dans Energy Pvt.Ltd., the Apex Court, IndowindEnergy Ltd.

ORDINAL: 7th, 24th, 6th, 14th, 14th, 7th, third, first, 7th, third, third, first, first, 24th

DATE: September 2006, 4th July 2007, May 2012, 3rd July 2012, August 2012, August 2012, August 2012, 6th November 2002, September 2006, clause-18, clause-28, 4th July 2007, 1793, 1986, 2005, 1996, 1886, 2003, 2011, 2008, 2006, 1177, 2008, 2001, 2005, 2008, 1432, 2012, 2003, 2004 3, para-15, June 28, 2012, September 2006, 18959573, “Contract”, clause-28, fifteen) days, fifteen 15, fifteen) days, 4th July 2007, clause-28, 22nd December 2012, 29th May 2012, para-16, 1966, 24th February 2006, 2009, 1956, 24.2.2006, 24.2.2006, 24.2.2006, 24.2.2006, February 2006, 8, paragraph-46

PRODUCT: No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1

PERSON: Shri Tulzapurkar, Anr, Anr, Shah, Ishardas Sudarshan Lal, L.J. 325, HarshadChiman Lal Modi v., Patel Engineering, v. V.G.Raju, Jayesh H. Pandya, Anr, Yash Raj Films Ltd., Shri Sancheti, W.S.G. Cricket Pte.Ltd., Chan Mal Baradia, Shri Sancheti, Anil Panjawani, Defendant no.1, Sahar Plaza, Andheri-Kurla Road, Mittal Tower, Nariman Point, rue de I'industrie, Jeumont Cedex, Contractor, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, Contractor, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, Subuthi, Sole Arbitrator, Indowind, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, Yogi Agrawal, Indowind, Indowind, Indowind, Indowind, Indowind, Sancheti, Kompetenz Kompetenz, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, Chan Mal Baradia

GPE: the State of Maharashtra, Mumbai, Mumbai, C.R., C.R., Delhi, France, France, India, C.R., Mumbai, France, Mumbai, India, Mumbai, India, India, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, France, Raigad, paragraphs-19, Bombay, Apex

FAC: Bhatia International, Jeumont India, Jeumont India, Bhatia International

WORK_OF_ART: Shri Sancheti, “Dispute”

LOC: Modiv, Indowind, Indowind, Indowind, Indowind, Indowind, Indowind, Indowind, Indowind, Indowind, Indowind, Indowind, Indowind, Indowind

PERCENT: more than 99%

MONEY: 27

TIME: minutes, 34 of the Act