Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

M/S. Roman Tarmat Ltd. Vs. M/S. (indukuru Venku Reddy Constructions) Ivrcl)

Decided On : Oct-16-2012

Court : Mumbai

LAW: section 9, section 9, the Main Contract, the Main Contract, section 9, section 9, Section 20, Section 120, Section 20, Section 20, Article 226, Section 120, Section 120, Section 20, Section 20, Section 120, Section 9, Section 9, the Section 9 Petition, Section 9, Section 9, the Division Bench, Section 20, Section 20, Section 20, Section 2(e, Section 9, section 42, section 9, section 9, section 9, section 42, the Arbitration Act, section 42, the Arbitration Act, section 9, the Arbitration Act, section 9, section 9, section 9

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 26.1, 2, 27, 26.2, 25, 26.1, 27, 3, seven, One, seven, seven, 400 050, 400, 078, 400, 099, 4, 12, two, 5, 6., 12, 12, 8), 12, 82, 12, 1987]1SCR200, three, 20, 16, 20, 65, 2.3.2006, 17.2, 27, 66, 74, 17.2, several thousand, over 12, 82, 8, 32, 12, 507, 12, 17, 662, 18, 9, 5, 20, two, two, one, 11, 3, 107, 12, two, 12, 13, 14, 12, 15, 16, 18, 19, 12, 20, one, 21

ORG: the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Piece Rate Work Contract, Chennai, GARC, Chennai, NATRIP, Chennai, R.T. Vijay Nagar Colony, Hyderabad, Thiru Vika Industrial Estate, Chennai, the Main Contract, PRW, PRW, Contract, Arbitration, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, PRW Contract, Chennai, Vijaya Bank, Vile Parle, Court, Vijaya Bank, Chennai, Chennai, S.V. Road, Road No, MCGM Bhandup Complex, Registered, Dorr Oliver House, Hon'ble Court, Letters Patent, Vijaya Bank Vile Parle Branch, Bank Guarantees, Chennai, Chennai, Hyderabad, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, Hyderabad, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, the Letters Patent, suits.-, Court, the Small Cause Court, the Bombay City Civil, the Supreme Court, JindalVijayanagar Steel, JSW Steel Ltd., Jindal Praxair Oxygen Company Ltd., the Letters Patent, “39.Under Clause, the Bombay High Court, Arbitration Petition, CPC, the applicability of Section 20, CPC, Chartered High Courts, CPC, Court, Sarguja Transport, MANU/SC/0114/1986, CPC, CPC, The Letters Patent, Chartered High Courts, the Letters Patent, the Chartered High Court, CPC, the Chartered High Court, the Sarguja Transport Case, Court, CPC, CPC, CPC, CPC, Letters Patent, FCI, the Civil Court, CPC, the High Court, CPC, CPC, Chartered High Courts, CPC, the Letters Patent, CPC, CPC, the Bombay High Court, the Ordinary Original Jurisdiction, the Bombay High Court, the Bombay High Court, Arbitration, the Board of Directors, the Board of Directors, Board of Directors, Ors, Vessel M.V., Fortune Express, AIR 2006 SC, Court, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Directors, the Bombay High Court, Court, AIR 2006 SC351, the Bombay High Court, the Registered Office, The Bombay High Court, Fazlehusseinv, AIR 1955 Bom, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Bombay High Court, Court, Bellary, the Civil Court, the Bombay High Court, the Bombay High Court, the Bombay High Court, Court, PratapSingh Vs, The Bank of America, the High Court, Kessowji, this High Court, the Bombay High Court, Court, KotakMahindra Finance Ltd., the High Court, Original Civil Jurisdiction, this High Court, Court, the Amended Letters Patent of this Court, Court, the Small Causes Court, the Bombay City Civil Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Court, Hyderabad, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Chennai, Hyderabad, Chennai, Chennai, the Supreme Court, Rajasthan State Electricity Board Vs, Universal Petrol Chemicals Ltd, Chennai, Letters Patent, the Supreme Court, Jindal Steel, Bombay High Court, the Board of Directors, Directors, the Supreme Court, Letters Patent, Chennai, Hyderabad, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, Chennai, Jindal Steel, Chennai, the High Court, Court of Small Causes”., Supreme, State of Punjab, Bajaj Electricals Ltd., AIR 1968, SC, the Supreme Court, Chennai

DATE: 1996, 16th June, 2010, 1996, Para 26, 15th September, 2012, Para 23, 27, 2006, Para 39, 49, 52, 53, 65, 66, 74, 49, 17, 52, 17, 2.3.2006, 23.6.2003, 1828, the later date, 8 full days, 4 days, the 7th, 9th, 10th, 2006, 5 days, 16th to 20th October, 2006, 30th July, 1976, 1976, Para 32, 1888, 1893, 15 of 1882, 2003, 16,, 17, 1996, 10.On, 1996, 2009, 1996, 1996

GPE: New Delhi, South Phase, Chennai, India, India, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, India, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, India, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Bombay, Bombay, JT, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, P.S., Satthappan, Mumbai, Mumbai, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Bombay, Mumbai, Bombay, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Karnataka, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, India, India, C.R., Bombay, Bombay, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, India, Mumbai, Mumbai, Chennai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai

ORDINAL: 6th, first, first, 11th, first

PERSON: Guindy, Chennai, Manging, Invoking, Amar Son, Bandra, Bhandup, Chakala, Andheri, Bandra, Bhandup, Sections 16, Writ Jurisdiction, Mayur, Sudhir G. Angur, M. Sanjeev, Sundaram, Directors, Award, Kessowji Damodar Jairam, Khimji Jairam, I.L.R., Scott J., Girdhar Damodar, Kassigar Hiragar, I.L.R., Girdhar Damodar's, T. Thomas Educational Trust, Narula

NORP: IVRCL, British, British, non-British, British, British

LOC: Respondent, Single

WORK_OF_ART: The Pipeline Supply Agreement, Supply Agreement, The Settlement Agreement, Applying Clause 12

PRODUCT: Para 5

EVENT: the C.P.C. Considering Section 120

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //