Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Maharashtra State Handicapped Employees'/Officers' Association Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Decided On : Jan-18-2013

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 2(b, the Central Act, Section 2(b, Section 2(b

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 505, less than 3/60, one, 3, 6/60, 4, three, three, 5., 6/60, less than 3/60, 6., less than 3/60, one, 8, 3, 475, 9, 10

DATE: 17 June 2011, 4 June 2001, 1995, 4 June 2001, 12 September 2012, 2009, 1995, eight weeks, today

PERSON: Zilla Parishad, Karnik, Zilla Parishad, Nashik Zilla Parishad, Syed Abdul Qadir, Zilla, Zilla

ORG: Zilla Parishad, Nashik, the Orthopedic Department, the Ophthalmology Department, the Orthopedic Officer, Government Hospital, the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation, the State Government, Parliament, the State Government, the State Government, Parliament, The State Government, Parliament, the State Government, Parliament, Nashik, the Supreme Court, State of Bihar, Court, the Supreme Court, Zilla Parishad, the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation

PERCENT: 40%, more than 40%

QUANTITY: less than 10 degree, 20 degree, less than 10 degree, less than 10 degree

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //