Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Maharashtra State Handicapped Employees'/Officers' Association Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Decided On : Jan-18-2013
Court : Mumbai
LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 2(b, the Central Act, Section 2(b, Section 2(b
CARDINAL: 1, 2, 505, less than 3/60, one, 3, 6/60, 4, three, three, 5., 6/60, less than 3/60, 6., less than 3/60, one, 8, 3, 475, 9, 10
DATE: 17 June 2011, 4 June 2001, 1995, 4 June 2001, 12 September 2012, 2009, 1995, eight weeks, today
PERSON: Zilla Parishad, Karnik, Zilla Parishad, Nashik Zilla Parishad, Syed Abdul Qadir, Zilla, Zilla
ORG: Zilla Parishad, Nashik, the Orthopedic Department, the Ophthalmology Department, the Orthopedic Officer, Government Hospital, the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation, the State Government, Parliament, the State Government, the State Government, Parliament, The State Government, Parliament, the State Government, Parliament, Nashik, the Supreme Court, State of Bihar, Court, the Supreme Court, Zilla Parishad, the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation
PERCENT: 40%, more than 40%
QUANTITY: less than 10 degree, 20 degree, less than 10 degree, less than 10 degree