Pil Industries Limited Vs. Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd. and Others

Decided On : Feb-04-2013

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the Companies Act, the Companies Act, the Depositories Act, the Companies Act, the Facility Agreement, the Facility Agreement, the Facility Agreement, the Loan Agreement, the Facility Agreement, the Loan Agreement, the Facility Agreement, Cal 97, the Full Bench, the Civil Procedure Code, the Full Bench

ORG: Taken on Board, Plaintiff, Court, Chamber, Plaintiff, Registered Office, Plaintiff, a Listed Company, Registered Office at Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh, Defendant No.7 - Future Capital Holdings Ltd., Personal Guarantors, Private Limited Company, Defendant No.1, Defendant No.1, Defendant No.7, Defendant No.7, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Court, Plaintiff, the Loan Facility Agreement, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Hon'ble Court, Plaintiff, this Hon'ble Court, Exhibit Q-1, Defendant Nos.1, Plaintiff, Defendant No.5, Plaintiff, Exhibit Q-1, Plaintiff, the Defendant Nos.1, this Hon'ble Court, Plaintiff, Hon'ble Court, the Defendant Nos.1, Plaintiff, Rs.300,00,00,000/-, Plaintiff, the Defendant Nos.1, this Hon'ble Court, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the Defendant Nos.1, the Court Receiver of this Hon'ble Court, Exhibit WW, CPC, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Exhibit WW, Plaintiff, Court, Plaintiff, Defendants, Court, Plaintiff, Court, Letters Patent, Court, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Facility, Facility, Defendant No.7, HDFC Bank, Plaintiff, Facility Agreement, Hon'ble Court, the Letters Patent, this Hon'ble Court, Defendant Nos.1, Court, Court, Chamber Summons, Court, Plaintiff, Court, Court, Plaintiff, Court Receiver, Court, Court Receiver, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Defendant Nos.1, Court, Defendant Nos.1, Court, Plaintiff, Defendant No.7, Loan Agreement, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Court, Plaintiff, Court, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Defendant No.7, HDFC Bank, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Court, Plaintiff, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Adcon Electronics Pvt, Daulat, Court, Wimco Ltd., Matoshree Shelters Pvt. Ltd., the Division Bench, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Adcon Electronics Pvt. Ltd., Plaintiff, the Learned Senior Advocate, Plaintiff, Court, Plaintiff, Court, Tribunal of Hyderabad, Plaintiff, Court, the Bombay High Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, A.B.C. Laminart Pvt. Ltd., A.P. Agencies, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the Calcutta High Court, A.K. Raha (Engineers) Ltd., State of Punjab AIR 1961, Court, Plaintiff, Court, the Chamber Summons, Plaintiff, Defendant No.1, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the Plaintiff - Future Corporate Resources Ltd., the Defendant No.1 Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited, Plaintiff, Courts, Defendant No.7, Facility, Plaintiff, Defendant No.7, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, A.B.C. Laminart Pvt. Ltd., A.P. Agencies, the Term Loan Agreement, Hyderabad, Plaintiff, The Learned Advocate, Plaintiff, the Calcutta High Court, A.K. Raha (Engineers) Ltd., State of Punjab AIR 1961, AIR 1940 Cal, Court, Smt, the Bombay High Court, ILR, ILR, the Rangoon High Court, Plaintiff, Court, the Letters Patent, the Letters Patent, the Calcutta High Court, Court, Court, the Learned Senior Counsel, Plaintiff, Defendant No.1, Court, Suit, the High Court, the Bombay High Court, the Letters Patent, Court, India Spinning, Weaving Co. Ltd., Climax Industrial Syndicate, Court, the High Court of Calcutta, Court, The South Indian Bank of Tinnevelly, Parliament, pp.1, Shivrao v. Pundlik, the Letters Patent, Court, the Privy Council, Anundo Moyee Dossee, the Letters Patent, the Letters Patent, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Court, Defendants, Court, Court, Plaintiff, Court, Plaintiff, Defendants, Plaintiff, Court, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Court, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Adcon Electronics Pvt. Ltd., Wimco Ltd., Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, A.B.C. Laminart Pvt. Ltd., Court, Plaintiff, Letters Patent, Court, Plaintiff

CARDINAL: 2, 3., 4., 3, 4, 4, 4, 5., 6, One hundred and twenty five, 5, 5, One hundred and twenty five, 2, 2, 2, 5, 2, 5, 2, 5, 5, 5, 4, 7, 12, 5, 5, 5, 12, 8, 12, 9, 10, 25(1)(e, 12, 12, 11, 7, 5, 615, 12, 13, 25, 2, 163, 14, 15, 5, 5.1, 25, 25, 16, 2, 163, 25, 12, 17, 7, 443, 40, 392, 11, 656, 30, 695, 251, 12, 12, 18, Seven, five, two, 75, 12, some fifty-four, 12, 12, one, 12, 1, 2, 124, two, 305, 18, 15, 134, 805, 51, 12, 26, 3, 14, 96, 26, 437, 441, 58, 21, 663, 12, 14, 101, 109, 109, 12, two, 14, 353, 12, 12, 3, 19, One hundred and twenty five, 5, 20, 12

DATE: 23rd August 2012, 1866, 23rd August 2012, 1956, 1956, 1996, 1956, August 2012, 11th July 2012, 25.1, 17th January 2012, 17th January 2012, 17th January 2012, 17th January 2012, 23rd August 2012, 23rd August 2012, 11th July 2012, August 2012, 17th January 2012, 23rd August 2012, 1927, 11th July 2012, 1989, 11th July 2012, 25.1, 17th January 2012, 1989, 1927, 46, 54, 1893, 1893, 1911, 46, 1887, 89, 1902, 1907, 34, 1919, 1871, 1890, 23rd August 2013

PERSON: R.S. Dalvi, interalia, Defendant No.7, Defendant No.7, Defendant No.7, Exhibit Q-1, Exhibit Q-1, Defendant No.7, Sawant, Plaint, Virag Tulzapurkar, Framroz Dinshaw, Defendant No.7, Defendant No.1, Schedule, Schedule, Deb, Williams, J., Tulsimani Bibi, Abdul Latif, Dhunji Shah v. A.B. Forde, Ramlinga Iyer, Jayalakshmi, Annamalai Chettyar v. Daw Hnin U, Common Law, Common Law, Tulzapurkar, Framroz Dinshaw, Bench, Charles Sargent, Charles Farran, Basil Scott, Lancelot Sanderson, Lawrence Jenkins, Victor Coutts-Trotter, Order XXI, Order XXI, Tarvadia Bholanath v. Bai, L.R., Kasinath Das, Sadasiv Patnaik, I.L.R., Nataraja Iyer, Order XXI, Mahomedan, Hindu Law, Rajsanji, Shekh Masludin, L.R. 90, Kripa Sindhu, Mukherjee v., Annada Sundari Debi, I.L.R., Rukmini Pattamahadevi, L.R. 655, Chunder Mookerjee, Holkar, I.L.R., Nos.2

GPE: Mumbai, mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Worli, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, the City of Hyderabad, Mumbai, Worli, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, L.J., Hatimbhai, Salem, Mumbai, Mumbai, Hyderabad, India, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Salem, Mumbai, Srilal Singhania v. Anantlal, India, Motilal, Mumbai, Hatimbhai, Halsbury, Karim, Phul Chand, L.R., I.L.R, F.B., Maharaja, P.C., Dadabhai, Mumbai, Hatimbhai, Mumbai

ORDINAL: 3rd, first, third, third, third, 3rd, first, second, third, first, first, first, first

PERCENT: 20%, 20%

FAC: Exhibits Q-1, Exhibits Q-1, Exhibit KKK, Defendant No.7, Defendant No.7, Defendant No.7

LOC: Plaintiff, Single, Single

WORK_OF_ART: Deed of Assignment, Deed of Assignment, 1941 Mad, Per Marten C.J., 7th Edition, The Chamber Summons

NORP: Maharashtra

PRODUCT: the Full Bench, BLR XXIX 498, Calcutta 166, Calcutta 166, Calcutta, BLR XXIX 498, No.1, Plaint

EVENT: the Loan Agreement

LANGUAGE: English, English, English